Why homosexuality should be banned

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
just cause you a gay toe fu eating cali pussy doesn't mean everyone on the board is.:fu:
the same reason you suck cock
fucking eh, don't suck the ghestapo's cock because thier criminally provided info was bad and the warrant wasn't as valueable as toilet paper. Suck away Nazi:321:
and stop thinking about my dick you fag.
I fucked your daughter twice.
I don't own and British fag stocks. Just cause your poor and uneducated doesn't mean the rest of us are. Are you a rent a cop security guard, I know your shitty education doesn't qualify you for much.
hold on after I finish fucking your mom:good4u:
suck my dick moron, you bet I get cranky when my stocks are down. You know what the fuck I was talking about. Now your changing to very strong.
If it had come in at 50,000 I might have bought my first pair of depends today.:clink:
.
 
..no one does it as often, it seems to me, as you do. USF posted an example. You do it to the point of obsession
.

Like this?

He'll fall to his knees and offer to suck the Judges cock, if they at least don't send him to jail.
And he made it possible for some guy to shove his cock in your mouth, while you're sitting at a bus stop.
The real reason is because you have your head shoved so far up your ass, that your eyes and ears are squeezed shut.
Do you like the taste of your fellow militias cocks, or do you prefer those that control you?
AND
You've done a real good job wiping the jizz off of your face, before your eyes are glued shut.
Wouldn't your militia buddy give you the web site, until after you were done sucking his cock?
The moron is anyone that has tried to spin this incident in an attempt to promote their asinine agenda, like you, and I've told you that I'm not a cop, so why would you want to blow me when it's obvious you have enough cock to suck with just the militia members you know.
And yet you still have a problem knowing the difference between a cock and a lollipop.
.
 
Wow, its like you knew where to find every post talking about gay sex acts.

Hmmm, now why would you remember that?? Oh yeah, now I remember.

:good4u:
 
you enable them!!!!

same way your logic is that if one supports gay marriage, their "queer enablers"....as if not having marriage has really stopped them

Calling it normal moral natural and healthy enables he queers. It is none of those. Yet normal marriage is all of those.

Your logic escapes me.
 
Calling it normal moral natural and healthy enables he queers. It is none of those. Yet normal marriage is all of those.

Your logic escapes me.

Not that "Its not normal, moral, natural or healthy" nonsense again. :palm:

Ok, so a marriage that ends in divorce, is it normal, moral, natural or healthy?
 
Its been naturally occuring in humans for all of recorded history.... Just because an act does not produce children does not make that act unnatural.

Masterbation is natural, it does not produce children....

Using your defination, monogamy is unnatural also....
 
I'm talking about marriage, and you are talking about divorce. Idiot.

Whats wrong, SM? I am not talking about divorce. I am talking about a marriage that ends in divorce. If the marriage ends in divorce, was the marriage normal, moral, natural or healthy?

I am not talking about the end, but about the marriage itself.
 
Its been naturally occuring in humans for all of recorded history.... Just because an act does not produce children does not make that act unnatural.

Masterbation is natural, it does not produce children....

Using your defination, monogamy is unnatural also....

None of the terms he used actually describe homosexuality.

Normal: This is the vaguest of all. It is not what the majority feel, but does that alone make it abnormal? For those who are born gay, it is completely normal. I guess if you want everyone behaving in exactly the same way, like robots, it might not be normal. But it is normal for a portion of the population.

Moral: If you follow the judeo-christian traditions, it might be seen as immoral. But even those focus solely on the sex act and ignore the emotional side. If someone can call deep emotional love immoral, then your standards for moral are very different. But we have to remember, any sex except for the purposes of creating a baby can be called immoral by the same yardstick.

Natural: This one is the funniest to me. Apparently "natural" is used by social conservatives like it is used in cereal ads, it can mean whatever they want. Air conditioning is not "natural". Shaving is not "natural". Makeup and dyed hair is not "natural". Birth control is not "natural".

But oddly, in order to make the "its not natural" complaint work, you have to ignore many studies showing same-sex pairings and sexual acts in nature. There are species of primates that have a great deal of same-gender sexual contact. Many species have it. And before you say it, SM, I am not talking about showing dominance. The National Geographic studies showed numerous species having same-gender sexual relationships that had nothing to do with dominance.


Healthy: And lastly we have the one that ties its entire existence into the anal sex part. If we base our information on the rates of disease transmission, lesbian have the healthiest sex of all. But this entire premise shows how the social conservative focus solely on the sex acts and ignore the emotional/romantic aspects of these relationships. It is not just sex, it is love and life-long commitments. It is people finding someone to love. That sounds healthy to me. If they take a little extra time for precautions, it isn't an issue.
 
Its been naturally occuring in humans for all of recorded history.... Just because an act does not produce children does not make that act unnatural.

Masterbation is natural, it does not produce children....

Using your defination, monogamy is unnatural also....

Neil Patrick Harris and his partner just had twins, what do you mean it doesn't produce children...

I know hetro of couples who use a surrogate...is their marriage not moral or legal or any of those other words because they can't produce children? What about those couples who have to use fertility drugs?

Every time you have sex it doesn't produce a child, thank goodness!
 
Back
Top