Why is a Constitutional Republic more proper than a democracy?

Rand is an illuminati cunt.
What illuminati? Do you even know what an illuminati is?
that stupid Shrug book is meant to convince simpletons that oligarchs are the "real victims",
Go read the book. You obviously haven't read it.
and supply side corporate worship internationalist fascism is the answer,
Go read the book. You obviously haven't read it.
and governments are socialist if they do anything but help corporations dominate people.
Redefinition fallacies. Corporations are not fascism. Fascism is a form of socialism.

Now that I think about it, I don't think "Atlas Shrugged" was ever translated into your language. I guess you can't read that book after all!
 
Redefinition fallacy. A democracy is not a negative.

It is government by popular vote. It has no constitution. It has no representatives.
Easily debunked by the sole fact that no such thing exists or has ever existed. People don't use words to describe something that doesn't exist except in ... children's stories, I guess.
 
Gee, well... let me see. There is not a SINGLE correct number in what you wrote. That's gotta be a record.

ROFL

You're going to have to do a lot better than that - or crawl back to FaceBook. You're not able to cut it here. We rely on facts. You have only abject ignorance to offer. Learn the terminology and the fundamental concepts.
 
There is only one election that affects beyond the boundaries of a state. States send representatives to serve their state, and only their state to the federal legislature. Likewise - originally the state government sent two Senators to represent the interests of the state on national issue. Now the Senate is no more meaningful than the house.

So the ONLY office one can vote on that extends beyond the state they live in is the presidency. In the presidency - currently all states do get a say - though democrats are trying to change that and disenfranchise all but the most populous states.

Look up who makes up the electoral college. And, the most populous states already have the most electors.
 
If roughly 50% of the population is under 18 and we have 330 million people, that would mean there are 165 million people of voting age. 15% of those are not citizens - dropping to 142 million possible voters.

So out of 142 million possible voters - assuming everyone eligible registered and voted, we had a 111% turnout.

Pretty impressive, and explains how Joe Biden became pResident.

There are some 238 million eligible. The 2020 was the largest turnout ever, at 158 million. Even if 50 million illegals voted it still wouldn't hit 111%, but yes, there were a lot of illegal votes, no question at all. But, the popular vote doesn't decide the President, the electoral college does.
 
Easily debunked by the sole fact that no such thing exists or has ever existed.
Yes it has. Athens was once a democracy. It dissolved into a dictatorship. The most recent attempt at democracy was CHAZ in Seattle, which dissolved into an oligarchy (before finally being dismantled by the City of Seattle).

People don't use words to describe something that doesn't exist except in ... children's stories, I guess.
There are many pieces of fiction that appeals to adults, and they make up words for the tableau of that piece of fiction all the time. Science fiction stories are a particularly good example.
 
Nope. A democracy is government by popular vote. There is no constitution and there are no representatives. There are currently no democracies in the world today.
According to your definition, there have never been. Or you would have named one.

In fact, what you say is nonsense. Language evolves. If it doesn't evolve it's a dead language. What was considered a democracy in ancient times (which is NOT nor has it EVER been what you describe) is not what is described today in political science.

The rest of your post is just you blurting out unsubstantiated nonsense. As if "words" had some sort of "magical" property to create reality. Words DESCRIBE things that exist. Language is a useful tool to communicate. What politicans, political scientists, English speakers UNDERSTAND by a word is what it means. And the consensus of what the word "democracy" means is clear: a government in which the people elect, in one way or another, who governs them. In other words, the opposite of a dictatorship. Plain and simple.

I don't want to give you links to THOUSANDS of pages in which not a SINGLE supports your claim. Just use google, if you still have any doubts.
 
Easily debunked by the sole fact that no such thing exists or has ever existed. People don't use words to describe something that doesn't exist except in ... children's stories, I guess.

You lack the intellect to debate and will again run and hide.

You ignored that I posted Athens already. It indeed existed, and a majority actually voted to put Socrates to death because they didn't like his ideas. Democracy in action.

You also ducked the fact that the Dictatorship of the Proletarians, part of the foundation of your party, is highly democratic.

In fact when Lenin instituted proletarian control in St. Petersburg he let the people vote on whether the Bourgeoisie would be fed or allowed shelter in the arctic winter. It was a classical example of democracy - resulting with the death of 60% of the population - some 2 million people. That was true democracy - voting on what jobs people would do, where they would live, what they would eat - with the Cheka always ready to gun down anyone not complying.

You seem unwilling to discuss democracy.
 
Look up who makes up the electoral college. And, the most populous states already have the most electors.

Yes, but not to the point that they can swamp the election. Remove the EC and California and New York will decide every president from that point on - disenfranchising the rest of the nation.
 
Yes, but not to the point that they can swamp the election. Remove the EC and California and New York will decide every president from that point on - disenfranchising the rest of the nation.

That's because only two Parties control all the elections and it's winner take all.. There is also Texas, Florida, and the Midwest, so Cali and NY are easily beaten, and it would be easier if it weren't for the electoral college.

Also requiring literacy and civics tests would eliminate 95% of California's votes, probably half of NYC's.
 
There are some 238 million eligible.

What is your source for this claim?

The 2020 was the largest turnout ever, at 158 million. Even if 50 million illegals voted it still wouldn't hit 111%, but yes, there were a lot of illegal votes, no question at all. But, the popular vote doesn't decide the President, the electoral college does.

Again - you appear to be grossly inflating the number of registered voters.

1724179312699.png

I can and do back my numbers up.

 
ROFL

You're going to have to do a lot better than that - or crawl back to FaceBook. You're not able to cut it here. We rely on facts. You have only abject ignorance to offer. Learn the terminology and the fundamental concepts.
You presented a few facts, but made a rather gross assumption, which was 50% of the population being younger than 18.
That's a randU, a number that is made up in someone's mind. It is a type of random number. You cannot use random numbers as "data".

I didn't call you on it since you generally are correct. Yes...that means I'm biased! :D
 
What is your source for this claim?



Again - you appear to be grossly inflating the number of registered voters.

View attachment 29932

I can and do back my numbers up.


238 million are of eligible age, and like I said, only 158 million voted in 2020. I didn't use Pwe as my source for election data but this link opped up at the top of google. It's close enough.


Voter turnout in the 2020 U.S. general election soared to levels not seen in decades, fueled by the bitter campaign between Joe Biden and Donald Trump and facilitated by pandemic-related changes to state election rules. More than 158.4 million people voted in that election, according to a Pew Research Center tabulation of official state returns, amounting to 62.8% of people of voting age, using Census Bureau estimates of the 2020 voting-age population.


The 2020 voting surge followed unusually high turnout in the 2018 midterm elections, when about 47.5% of the voting-age population – and 51.8% of voting-age citizens – went to the polls.


The site I use has huge tables and doesn't cut and paste well.
 
Yes it has. Athens was once a democracy. It dissolved into a dictatorship.
Of course it was! But not by YOUR definition.

Athens had a complex government with many levels, some elected, some selected at random. They HAD a constitution (which you claimed doesn't exist). The Constitution was written by Aristotle (maybe you want to claim Aristote didn't exist?)

This is what the Athenian Government lookd like according to its CONSTITUTION.

1724179419370.png
 
Back
Top