Into the Night
Verified User
of course they are.
they're an investment in the certainty of tyranny.
Bonds are not fascism, dumbass. They are not an investment in a certainty of tyranny either.
of course they are.
they're an investment in the certainty of tyranny.
Bonds are not fascism, dumbass. They are not an investment in a certainty of tyranny either.
Bullshit.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/opi...ity-medicare-medicaid-believe-him/4978568002/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ty-and-medicare-if-he-s-reelected/ar-BB17JIZa
https://www.forbes.com/sites/teresa...ocial-security-starve-the-beast/#404d0de43794
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/26/privatization-is-really-a-plan-to-dismantle-social-security.html
https://www.fedsmith.com/2013/10/11/ronald-reagan-and-the-great-social-security-heist/
It's an FDR thing. Republicans have been against it forever.
Social Security, in more ways than one the mother of all U.S. entitlement programs, has been the dragon that conservatives have succeeded in slashing, but never slaying, over its 80-year history. Their opposition has morphed from outright ideological grounds as the program was being debated during the New Deal era to a campaign masked in careful rhetoric once Social Security became virtually untouchable as a political animal.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/conservative-war-on-social-security-history
Rationalize 80 years of attacks![]()
FWIW I don't collect any for more than a decade, and that is if and only if they don't move goalposts. I contributed since I was 14 years old,
I'd say I'm entitled to it.
anonymoose
#SaveAuntJemima
This message is hidden because anonymoose is on your ignore list.
I don't object to the debate, I object to you denying the ideological battle your party has waged and failed to succeed with like...forever.
Just because you aren't making progress up the river doesn't mean I don't see the direction you are rowing.
Hello Micawber,
Part of the Republican party depends on people believing in things that just are not true.
Many Republicans have chosen to overlook the racism of the Republican party, thinking of it as 'the less desirable aberration of the party,' but the reality is that it has actually been a hushed feature.
There was a time when the stock market was a indicator of the future economy. The idea was that insiders and rich people knew things that we did not. However, now the market is decoupled from the economy. It is a casino where the wealthy are building even bigger fortunes with almost no risk. The market goes up and down with little or no connection to the economy.
There was a time when the stock market was a indicator of the future economy. The idea was that insiders and rich people knew things that we did not. However, now the market is decoupled from the economy. It is a casino where the wealthy are building even bigger fortunes with almost no risk. The market goes up and down with little or no connection to the economy.
There's almost no risk in the stock market? Wow, can't say I've heard that argument made often. Is this because you're a big baller and have it all figured out? Or just have a very short memory of market crashes past?
(now there is a definite argument to be made about the Fed and their actions back dropping the market in an unhealthy manner but I'm guess that's not where you were going with this)
There was a time when the stock market was a indicator of the future economy. The idea was that insiders and rich people knew things that we did not. However, now the market is decoupled from the economy. It is a casino where the wealthy are building even bigger fortunes with almost no risk. The market goes up and down with little or no connection to the economy.
of course they are.
Yes. While there is unavoidable broad brush at play when we have divided the country in 2, they are uniquely adept at pointing out the fact that their
failure to achieve ends is somehow proof they don't intend them.
There was a time when the stock market was a indicator of the future economy. The idea was that insiders and rich people knew things that we did not. However, now the market is decoupled from the economy. It is a casino where the wealthy are building even bigger fortunes with almost no risk. The market goes up and down with little or no connection to the economy.
Cue word, past. The so-called crashes since daffy has been crapping on a vibrant economy are settled by waiting. It comes back with no economic changes. It comes back when the economy sinks or climbs. https://spendmenot.com/blog/average-stock-market-return/
Bonds are not fascism, dumbass. They are not an investment in a certainty of tyranny either.
You’re saying there’s no risk in the stock market then link to an article talking about market crashes of the past? How does that work?
I know investors used to talk about the Greenspan put, is that why you are referencing no risk? It seems to have been carried on in a various degrees by his predecessors.