Why Isn't Facebook Banning Anitfa?

AProudLefty

Adorable how loser is screeching for attention. :)
Question... Why does Facebook let radical, violent, extremist groups on the Left like Antifa keep their pages then? :thinking:

https://www.facebook.com/sometimesantisocialalwaysantifascist/

As but one example...

Yes, we do... But it would be nice to see some of the Lefties here try and defend that...

Defend what? The alleged threat and violence?

What can they say?

I'd really like to know how Facebook is deciding who might know potential extremists, and I’d definitely like to know how Facebook defines “extremism,” given their interesting definition of “fact checking.”

Show examples of said "extremism".
 
:rofl2: They won't stop. :rofl2:

CEi2xfU.jpg
 
FB won't do anything unless the page in question has posts that violate its terms of service. There are literal craptons of alt-right pages that are on Facebook; they won't be banned either unless they continually allow posts that violate the TOS -- despite how many LWers report them.
 
rzPvw3a.gif
jKlxa82.gif
rzPvw3a.gif
jKlxa82.gif
rzPvw3a.gif
jKlxa82.gif
rzPvw3a.gif
jKlxa82.gif
rzPvw3a.gif
jKlxa82.gif
rzPvw3a.gif
jKlxa82.gif
rzPvw3a.gif
jKlxa82.gif


[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.[Just the beginning of rounding up the free thinkers.
 
Once again Legion refuses to answer my question. We all know why.

Now, what do you consider to be a "potential extremism" from a Leftist?
 
The TRUMPTARDS require a scapegoat for everything they do- TO BLAME THEIR SHIT ON!

The TRUMPTARDED IDIOTS HAVE TO HAVE A BOOGIE-MAN TO SCARE THEIR PARANOID SCHITZOIDS WITH- TO GET THEIR TRUMP PANTIES ALL IN A WAD ABOUT!

29ce0764-f00e-485e-91cd-ae8febd745ba_1.2ff9f2985af69d3ecc4b02fa2d46506b.jpeg
 
Being anti-Antifa is being pro-fascist, plain and simple, and the JPP righties actually line up to proclaim their pro-fascist beliefs,
even as they bitch for more anarchistic freedoms. There isn't a sane trumpanzee in the entire JPP gaggle.
 
Being anti-Antifa is being pro-fascist, plain and simple, and the JPP righties actually line up to proclaim their pro-fascist beliefs,
even as they bitch for more anarchistic freedoms. There isn't a sane trumpanzee in the entire JPP gaggle.

What? Are you really that... Never mind, you are.

One can clearly be anti-Antifa and be against fascists at the same time. The two are not mutually inclusive. What you propose is a propositional fallacy known as denying the antecedent. To expand this a bit, one might say

Antifa are violent thugs and I don't support them and am against their actions. Then one could say I don't support Fascism in any form. Those are both correct statements of logic and a proof that your proposition is invalid and wrong.

As for the rest of your nonsense, I'd need examples to work off of since your blanket generalizations without them are invalid too.
 
Back
Top