Why liberals like censoring

T

tinfoil

Banned
I tried to imagine not knowing how to question my own understanding and it allowed me to finally understand liberals. If I wasn't sure I'd find my way back to sanity after questioning myself, I'd be willing to advocate for censoring anything I was afraid might do such a thing.

LOL
Liberals: It's how they work!
 
tinfoil said:
I tried to imagine not knowing how to question my own understanding and it allowed me to finally understand liberals. If I wasn't sure I'd find my way back to sanity after questioning myself, I'd be willing to advocate for censoring anything I was afraid might do such a thing.

LOL
Liberals: It's how they work!
Click to expand...

Which mainstream Liberals want to censor things?
 
tinfoil said:
The CEO at google
The CEO at facebook
I'm not talking about politicians. I'm talking about the individuals of your party
Click to expand...

That's not censorship. That's private companies deciding who they want to give a platform to. I thought you Capitalists liked that.
And don't blame me. I'm not a Democrat or a Capitalist.
 
tinfoil said:
I tried to imagine not knowing how to question my own understanding and it allowed me to finally understand liberals. If I wasn't sure I'd find my way back to sanity after questioning myself, I'd be willing to advocate for censoring anything I was afraid might do such a thing.

LOL
Liberals: It's how they work!
Click to expand...

Zowie! That’s some powerful shit that you’re smoking! :rofl2:
 
Censor? Liberals don't want to censor. If some trilobite wants to say racist things they can. They just have to know it will be used against them. Social media is essentially completely public displays. Also, certain displays aren't OK for certain places. You start going off on a rant at a restaurant you will likely be rightfully kicked out.
 
tinfoil said:
I tried to imagine not knowing how to question my own understanding and it allowed me to finally understand liberals. If I wasn't sure I'd find my way back to sanity after questioning myself, I'd be willing to advocate for censoring anything I was afraid might do such a thing.

LOL
Liberals: It's how they work!
Click to expand...

CORRECT! :clap:
 
Jade Dragon said:
Censor? Liberals don't want to censor. If some trilobite wants to say racist things they can. They just have to know it will be used against them. Social media is essentially completely public displays. Also, certain displays aren't OK for certain places. You start going off on a rant at a restaurant you will likely be rightfully kicked out.
Click to expand...

Calling everyone who disagrees with you a racist so that you can diminish everything they say is a form of censure and dishonest hackery.
 
StoneByStone said:
That's not censorship. That's private companies deciding who they want to give a platform to. I thought you Capitalists liked that.
And don't blame me. I'm not a Democrat or a Capitalist.
Click to expand...

Censorship doesn't require government, dumbfuck. Consult a dictionary
 
StoneByStone said:
That's not censorship. That's private companies deciding who they want to give a platform to. I thought you Capitalists liked that.
And don't blame me. I'm not a Democrat or a Capitalist.
Click to expand...

Can we assume that you expect others to respect and accept their decision?
 
Truth Detector said:
Calling everyone who disagrees with you a racist so that you can diminish everything they say is a form of censure and dishonest hackery.
Click to expand...

It's weak and worn out. In fact, it actually works against their goal, unless their goal is really to divide. In which case, it's working great.
Visit NateHiggers.com for more info. LOL
 
Truth Detector said:
Calling everyone who disagrees with you a racist so that you can diminish everything they say is a form of censure and dishonest hackery.
Click to expand...

Dgno7OwVQAA1dEJ.jpg
 
CFM said:
The definition makes no mention as to who does it.
Click to expand...

Really? The definition clearly includes anyone with the power to prevent a message from being conveyed. Government, media, school, business, any controlling authority. Am I misunderstanding the point of your post?
 
tinfoil said:
It's weak and worn out. In fact, it actually works against their goal, unless their goal is really to divide. In which case, it's working great.
Visit NateHiggers.com for more info. LOL
Click to expand...

Their goal is to LIE and DIVIDE. They have tried every lie to separate Trump from his core supporters. Now, with the help of a dishonest media that no longer feigns to be objective, they hope to separate the rest of America from Trump.

I don't think the American people are as stupid and ignorant as core Democratic Party of the Jackass constituents and they will prove that again in 2020.

I predict that Biden will become their nominee; and he will perform much like Mondale did in 1984. ;)
 
tinfoil said:
Really? The definition clearly includes anyone with the power to prevent a message from being conveyed. Government, media, school, business, any controlling authority. Am I misunderstanding the point of your post?
Click to expand...

That's why I agreed with you. I can't remember which left wing dickhead said it wasn't censoring but private businesses choosing who to give a platform to. Nothing in the definition supports his claim that if it's a private business it's not censoring.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top