Why No one trusts Republicans

TuTu Monroe said:
..and during that time of peace and prosperity, our enemies were waiting patiently and planning their attack on us, knowing full well the Democrats weren't paying any attention, as usual.
Click to expand...
Then how comes they attacked during a Republican administration? Was it because they thought W could fuck up a wet dream? Ya know you didn't exactly have to be Nostradamus to see that coming.
 
cawacko said:
You still haven't answered my question from earlier today why big cities and then I specifically mentioned Oakland and San Francisco where there are only Democrats in charge have such corruption and poor governship from people who supposedly care so much about government?
Click to expand...
Hey, who's defending Democrats? Did I mention Democrats? There not exactly trust worthy either. Are they the fuck ups that the right wing of the Republican party is? Hell no. Does that mean I want Richard Daily running my town? Hell no.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
No. I don't trust anyone farther than I can throw them. That's just human nature. Besides, it's an irrelevant question. Government has an important and very much needed function. As a society we absolutely need sound, affective, competent and wise governance. I've despaired of seeing that come out of a right wing dominated Republican party. That's why I left the party and became a Democrat. For all the Democrats flaws (and they abound) at least they can govern with out pissing on their own feet.
Click to expand...

Let me know when the gov't fits that description. I haven't seen it in my lifetime.
 
Adam Weinberg said:
No one could trust the GOP the last few go-rounds.

Conservatives were not satisfied and liberals were certainly appalled, though they may have been regardless.

I had certainly heard from more conservatives (not just libertarians) the accusation that Bush is a leftist, among other things, than from liberals that Obama is not genuine in many of their concerns.

Ultimately the GOP incompetence and lack of focus on their core principles that got them elected came front and center in a time in which even the politically disinterested people of the country were suffering enough to do something about it.

What credible argument did the GOP have that it offered better proposals than Obama? They initiated very similar ones and were therefore beaten on territory that should naturally belong to the left. It will be a lesson for some time that the GOP is directly responsible for the expansion of government that has occured under President Obama.

They set most of the dangerous precedents that make this kind of unlimited government a bipartisan idea in Washington.

You reap what you sow. If you set up a government big enough to give you everything you want (which is not just a statement about economic affairs), it is big enough to take everything you have. Big government is convenient when you wish to benefit from state power, but a terrible thing when you are on the outside of it.

If George W. Bush had been able to keep Republicans united on what they said they actually believed, and what they were expected to do when they were elected in 2000, we might still have a Republican government today.

Their traditions are not controversial with most Americans, it is their performance and the ulterior motives of their leadership and figureheads.

It is all the better that we do not have that kind of government until the proper lessons are learned about what should be expected of the right of center party in this country.
Click to expand...

Now that is the best explanation of what happened!

If the conservative republicans had kept their promises they would have made the changes the country needed. But they didn't.

And Bush was more leftist than conservative.
 
cawacko said:
I think Mott has been spending time up in Michigan. His brain is temporariy f'd up.
Click to expand...

no kidding....how about, "why no one trusts Democrats".....
Detroit, Flint, Saginaw, Benton Harbor, Lansing.......why is it that every failed city government is historically controlled by Democrats.....
 
Superfreak said:
Well, if he was in Michigan, then we have to cut him some slack. Especially if he was anywhere near Ann Arbor.... which is about as big of a crap pile as the shoe.
Click to expand...

Hey...The downtown area is full of decent places, as much as the city is super liberal and college towny.
 
Adam Weinberg said:
Hey...The downtown area is full of decent places, as much as the city is super liberal and college towny.
Click to expand...

LOL... not a fan of the little Ten... thus I mock them, regardless of reality. I mean really... if you can't even accurately count the number of schools in your conference... you should be mocked.

:cool:
 
Superfreak said:
LOL... not a fan of the little Ten... thus I mock them, regardless of reality. I mean really... if you can't even accurately count the number of schools in your conference... you should be mocked.

:cool:
Click to expand...

slave to modernism.....ten can be eleven or twelve if you choose.....
 
Superfreak said:
Well, if he was in Michigan, then we have to cut him some slack. Especially if he was anywhere near Ann Arbor.... which is about as big of a crap pile as the shoe.
Click to expand...

Once again you have crossed the line! This is one time where Desh like identification is true. Ohio = Good Michigan = Bad
 
SmarterThanYou said:
that's because they are too busy pissing on your own.
Click to expand...
Well that's my point! At least they are competent enough to know where to aim!

Look, to sum it up concisely. Why Democrats are superior to Republicans.

When it comes to politics Republicans give you the shaft.

Democrats, on the other hand, put vaseline on the shaft!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top