Why not release the report?

Earl said:
Quit being a dishonest moron, if that is even possible.

Status of the Department's Review

"The relevant regulations contemplate that the Special Counsel's report will be a "confidential report" to the Attorney General. See Office of Special Counsel, 64 Fed. Reg. 37,038, 37,040-41 (July 9, 1999). As I have previously stated, however, I am mindful of the public interest in this matter. For that reason, my goal and intent is to release as much of the Special Counsel's report as I can consistent with applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies.

Based on my discussions with the Special Counsel and my initial review, it is apparent that the report contains material that is or could be subject to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6( e ), which imposes restrictions on the use and disclosure of information relating to "matter[ s] occurring before [a] grand jury." Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(2)(B). Rule 6(e) generally limits disclosure of certain grand jury information in a criminal investigation and prosecution. Id. Disclosure of 6( e) material beyond the strict limits set forth in the rule is a crime in certain circumstances. See, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 401(3). This restriction protects the integrity of grand jury proceedings and ensures that the unique and invaluable investigative powers of a grand jury are used strictly for their intended criminal justice function.

Given these restrictions, the schedule for processing the report depends in part on how quickly the Department can identify the 6( e) material that by law cannot be made public. I have requested the assistance of the Special Counsel in identifying all 6( e) information contained in the report as quickly as possible. Separately, I also must identify any information that could impact other ongoing matters, including those that the Special Counsel has referred to other offices. As soon as that process is complete, I will be in a position to move forward expeditiously in determining what can be released in light of applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies.

As I observed in my initial notification, the Special Counsel regulations provide that "the Attorney General may determine that public release of' notifications to your respective Committees "would be in the public interest." 28 C.F.R. § 600.9(c). I have so determined, and I will disclose this letter to the public after delivering it to you.

Sincerely,
William P. Barr Attorney General"

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/de...Committees.pdf
Click to expand...

Once again, here are the laws.

Now STFU you lying democrats.
 
Teflon Don said:
You are the one acting scared.
Click to expand...

You are stalling by vaguely referring to "the law" because you have no good reason for why Barr is continuing to obstruct a report he got 4 days ago and had all weekend + Monday and today to review.

It's obvious he's covering it up.

That's why he didn't release the report, and why he never will unless compelled to do so by a court order, which he will fight.
 
Teflon Don said:
The information in the report is the information in the report. Nothing or nobody is going to change it
Click to expand...

Except that is what Barr is trying to do by preemptively getting in front of it by issuing his own subjective, personal summary to muddy the waters before the actual report is released.
 
LV426 said:
You are stalling by vaguely referring to "the law" because you have no good reason for why Barr is continuing to obstruct a report he got 4 days ago and had all weekend + Monday and today to review.

It's obvious he's covering it up.

That's why he didn't release the report, and why he never will unless compelled to do so by a court order, which he will fight.
Click to expand...

Cite the law that says he has to release it and when he has to release it.
 
Teflon Don said:
Look. I understand. Your entire world view was upended this weekend. You believed there was collusion. There wasn’t. You have been lied to and that is hard to process. I am here for you
Click to expand...

You believe what Barr tells you.

That makes you a sucker.

But we already knew you were a sucker because you got conned into voting for Trump.
 
Declare victory and suppress the reality... The Rump way. The ReTrumplican way. Not a recipe for a win in 2020.
 
katzgar said:
Since trump started his Mueller is the enemy of the people s*** again this morning it's pretty clear that there's something in the report that is pretty damning
Click to expand...

It does seem Unethical for Mueller to have failed to reach a conclusion on whether President Donald Trump obstructed justice. He could have gone deeper if he had probable cause from his 2 year investigation. Just a terrible way to word it in the summary.
 
“Fairness of procedure is “due process in the primary sense.” Brinkerhoff-Faris Co. v. Hill, 281 U. S. 673, 281 U. S. 681.

In a long line of cases, the United States Supreme Court has held that impingements of constitutional rights are, without variation, subject to the strictures of “due process” or notice and opportunity to be heard prior to their enactments"
.

The people mentioned in the Mueller Report must be protected.

Stick that up your culo and smoke it.
 
Teflon Don said:
You have proof of nothing. Just your silly conjecture and conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...

All you have is a biased summary written by the same guy who covered up Iran/Contra.

That's all you have.

That's the sum total of everything for you.

Trump's hand-picked AG's summary.

That's all you got.
 
Teflon Don said:
Remember when you believed Michael Cohen was in Prague?
Click to expand...

Search my posts.

I've never said anything about Cohen and Prague.

Nice try with the deflection, though.

Here's one for you; why isn't Barr releasing the report? Why are you demanding we accommodate his summary?
 
and Barrs "take" wont stand folks


you can NOT cover up the report

witnesses can tell everyone what they were asked and what they answered
 
Yurt said:
Prove he is covering it.
Click to expand...

By not releasing the report and demanding everyone accommodate his slapdash summary.

Don't you want to see the full report for yourself?

Why are you content to just accept what Barr said and move on?
 
Yurt said:
It has already been explained that it will be released once it is reviewed according to law.
Click to expand...

Which law?

You keep saying this, but cannot cite what law to which you're referring.

That means you're just making shit up.
 
Earl said:
“Fairness of procedure is “due process in the primary sense.” Brinkerhoff-Faris Co. v. Hill, 281 U. S. 673, 281 U. S. 681.

In a long line of cases, the United States Supreme Court has held that impingements of constitutional rights are, without variation, subject to the strictures of “due process” or notice and opportunity to be heard prior to their enactments"
.

The people mentioned in the Mueller Report must be protected.

Stick that up your culo and smoke it.
Click to expand...

dear fucking idiot


that doesn't stand in a case where the defendant is the only person on the earth who the DOJ says cant be indicted


A SITTING PRESIDENT



so in that case the congress makes the call



fuck you very much
 
Earl said:
“Fairness of procedure is “due process in the primary sense.” Brinkerhoff-Faris Co. v. Hill, 281 U. S. 673, 281 U. S. 681.
Click to expand...

That's not a law you're citing.

Furthermore, this has nothing to do with holding back a report they've had 4 days to review.


The rights of those mentioned in the Mueller Report MUST be protected.
Click to expand...

I thought you said the Mueller report cleared Trump. So what are you talking about? Whose rights? What rights?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top