Why Reichtards Figuratively Fellate the Founders

[NiftyNiblick]

Many Americans, when considering the Constitution of the United States of America, think first of the Bill of Rights [1st ten amendments].

The heart of our constitution, however, are the original articles which define the configuration of our national government.

And the way our national government is configured, rural arch conservatives are RADICALLY over-represented relative to their percentage of the overall population.
This is simple, irrefutable fact.

IT GAVE US A FORM OF GOVERNMENT VASTLY INFERIOR TO THOSE OF MORE MODERN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLICS.

This failure to open their eyes is the reason why I get angrier with Democrats like Nomad and PoliTalker than I do with the Reichtards themselves.
The Reichtards are devolved mutants. They are incapable of cogent thought at the human level.

The so-called "moderate Democrats," on the other hand, are humans, albeit obviously deficient ones.

They don't recognize the culture war.
They love the Constitution as much as the mutants do, even though it works against them.
Worst of all, they're hopeless Pollyannas who,
believing that radical problems can be addressed with moderate solutions,
are joining the trumpanzee mutants as an impediment to progress.

 

[Cypress]

James Madison hated the idea of equal state representation in the Senate. His original vision was proportional representation in the legislature based on state population.

Madison did not see any sense that states with tiny populations would have equal say with the states with larger populations.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

James Madison hated the idea of equal state representation in the Senate. His original vision was proportional representation in the legislature based on state population.
Madison did not see any sense that states with tiny populations would have equal say with the states with larger populations.

Jimmy was right. Neither do I.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

Also, "figuratively fellate the founders" was unintended but pretty good alliteration, it turns out.

 

[christiefan915]

Also, "figuratively fellate the founders" was unintended but pretty good alliteration, it turns out.

I was just going to write that!

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Many Americans, when considering the Constitution of the United States of America, think first of the Bill of Rights [1st ten amendments].

The heart of our constitution, however, are the original articles which define the configuration of our national government.

And the way our national government is configured, rural arch conservatives are RADICALLY over-represented relative to their percentage of the overall population.
This is simple, irrefutable fact.

IT GAVE US A FORM OF GOVERNMENT VASTLY INFERIOR TO THOSE OF MORE MODERN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLICS.

This failure to open their eyes is the reason why I get angrier with Democrats like Nomad and PoliTalker than I do with the Reichtards themselves.
The Reichtards are devolved mutants. They are incapable of cogent thought at the human level.

The so-called "moderate Democrats," on the other hand, are humans, albeit obviously deficient ones.

They don't recognize the culture war.
They love the Constitution as much as the mutants do, even though it works against them.
Worst of all, they're hopeless Pollyannas who,
believing that radical problems can be addressed with moderate solutions,
are joining the trumpanzee mutants as an impediment to progress.

there's nothing special about people forming a government.
the bill of rights is the most important part of the constitution, that's what makes it special.

your antifreedom agenda is failing to control the narrative. that's what happens when you lie all the time.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

IT GAVE US A FORM OF GOVERNMENT VASTLY INFERIOR TO THOSE OF MORE MODERN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLICS.

What makes it "vastly inferior?"

How is it vastly inferior to say the European parliamentary system?

 

[BidenPresident]

Also, "figuratively fellate the founders" was unintended but pretty good alliteration, it turns out.

Yes it was, congratulations.

 

[BidenPresident]

What makes it "vastly inferior?"

How is it vastly inferior to say the European parliamentary system?

Parliaments allow for minority parties to actually have power in legislature. Our two party system makes it easier to consolidate power.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

there's nothing special about people forming a government.
the bill of rights is the most important part of the constitution, that's what makes it special.

your antifreedom agenda is failing to control the narrative. that's what happens when you lie all the time.

The Bill of Rights was merely added to the Constitution.

The original articles formed the government, and did it, as we now see, very badly.

There can be no reasonable argument that it resulted in rural conservatives being radically over-represented as a percentage of the population.
Nobody is even trying to dispute that.

Those that hold such regressive, unenlightened views are protected by our now obviously inadequate constitution from marginalization,
when their severe marginalization is essential to our developing into a modern progressive nation.

The AssHats of the world are naturally in favor it. Sub-humans mutants are afforded far more status than a modern, civilized nation would afford them.
But when allegedly human Democrats like PoliTalker and Nomad don't raise objection,
they effectively diminish themselves to sub-human mutant status as well.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

The Bill of Rights was merely added to the Constitution.

The original articles formed the government, and did it, as we now see, very badly.

There can be no reasonable argument that it resulted in rural conservatives being radically over-represented as a percentage of the population.
Nobody is even trying to dispute that.

Those that hold such regressive, unenlightened views are protected by our now obviously inadequate constitution from marginalization,
when their severe marginalization is essential to our developing into a modern progressive nation.

The AssHats of the world are naturally in favor it. Sub-humans mutants are afforded far more status than a modern, civilized nation would afford them.
But when allegedly human Democrats like PoliTalker and Nomad don't raise objection,
they effectively diminish themselves to sub-human mutant status as well.

it's still what makes it great, your idiot points aside.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

What makes it "vastly inferior?"

How is it vastly inferior to say the European parliamentary system?

The European parliamentary system provides a government far more representative of the governed.
Our government radically over-represents rural conservatives to the serious detriment of the nation.
These are people who know how to grow wheat and corn and soy, bless them, but who really don't need to be telling sophisticated people how to live.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

it's still what makes it great, your idiot points aside.

Your believing that proves my points pretty convincingly.
You're comparing the opinions of a devolved mutant, yourself, to those of an educated human, myself.
In a conflict of wits, it's not a very equitable pairing.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

The European parliamentary system provides a government far more representative of the governed.
Our government radically over-represents rural conservatives to the serious detriment of the nation.
These are people who know how to grow wheat and corn and soy, bless them, but who really don't need to be telling sophisticated people how to live.

our states are important as semi-sovereign entities.

feds --> states --> people. they allow the amazing quilt of our diverse nation.

what makes a person sophisticated, being a snob who believes globalist lies?

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Your believing that proves my points pretty convincingly.
You're comparing the opinions of a devolved mutant, yourself, to those of an educated human, myself.
In a conflict of wits, it's not a very equitable pairing.

your narcissism isn't a compelling argument.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

feds --> states --> people. they allow the amazing quilt of our diverse nation.

You have here defined the very paradigm that has made the American Experiment a perpetual, never-ending culture war.

Diverse nation? How about incompatible, irreconcilable nation?

Destructive lunacy is, for all intents and purposes, your insane religion

 

[PostmodernProphet]

James Madison hated the idea of equal state representation in the Senate. His original vision was proportional representation in the legislature based on state population.

Madison did not see any sense that states with tiny populations would have equal say with the states with larger populations.

didn't the rest of the founders reject his ideas?......

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

You have here defined the very paradigm that has made the American Experiment a perpetual, never-ending culture war.

Diverse nation? How about incompatible, irreconcilable nation?

Destructive lunacy is, for all intents and purposes, your insane religion

that's you. you're projecting again.

just admit you don't believe in diversity and are actually a totalitarian addicted to lies.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

What makes it "vastly inferior?"

it prevents him from imposing his will on everyone......

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Parliaments allow for minority parties to actually have power in legislature. Our two party system makes it easier to consolidate power.

Not true. Minority parties have to form coalitions with larger ones with similar political values resulting in a de facto two-party system of governance. While the US system does, indeed, make it easier for the parties to consolidate power, it also results in far less government by shaky coalition, and little chance that an extremist party can take power or have substantial influence in governance.

The European system has often resulted in radically Leftist government that has brought ruin to the nations it got control of. The Fascists of the 30's would be a excellent example. Hitler, for example, came to power on a distinctly minority vote and used coalition building to gain it. Communists in nations like Greece or pre-WW 2 France got enough power to completely screw the economy and flummox government. Labor in England in the 50's and 60's nearly bankrupted England and destroyed much of that nation's industry from coal, to aircraft, to automobiles.

Almost every country from Mexico to Argentina in the Americas has wallowed in economic mediocrity and social unrest due to adoption of the Parliamentary System. It works, but it doesn't work well.