WHY THE LEFT IN AMERICA DESPISE SYDNEY SWEENEY

That's funny, Phantasmal ? Because what made this Jeans ad such a hit was not the fact that it featured Sidney Sweeney.


It cold have used any young American girl who was : (1) WHITE; (2) BLUE-EYED; (3) had LONG, BLONDE (OR FAIR) COLOURED HAIR (4) HAD A NICE PAIR OF BIGGISH, PERKY TITTIES ( (y) (y) (y) (y) (y)) (5) A FIT-LOOKING, SLENDER FIGURE and STANDARD, NORDIC FACIAL FEATURES.


There are no doubt millions of young women in America who would meet these conventional criteria for American beauty standards.



Why the ad was successful is that it dares to break a TABOO. Women who have the features I listed in the second paragraph of this post ARE beautiful. I mean they are OBJECTIVELY beautiful, and men who meet them and then say later that they did find them beautiful (or very attractive) are lying, or they have some kind of problem; usually a psychological and/ or psychiatric disorder . In any case, such men are very much a minority of the overall, male population.



The "American Eagle" dared to point out the "CONNECTION that exists between FEMALE PHYSICAL BEAUTY and GENETICS. When Sidney Sweeney says she's "GOT GREAT GENES", and talks about how a person's genetic material is passed down from generation to generation. She's right. She correct when she says that she has inherited "GOOD GENES;" If she ever decided to use one of those DNA testing kits (like "23 and Me") there's no doubt the results would show she has distinctive Nordic (Scandinavian or North German) ancestry. For example, Viking girls who were based in Sweden and Denmark (and Norway, if I remember) between 800 and 1100 AD, were generally: quite tall, had very long Blonde or fair shaded hair, blue (or pale green) eyes, fair skin, a relatively slender, though fit/athletic build and good teeth. We know this from archaelogical/genetic studies that have been performed on the remains of many Vikings' bodies that have been exhumed from their burial sites, etc; in Scandinavia.So we would probably say that many of the young, Viking women were very pretty/beautiful, if we could travel back in time and meet them. They would look very similar, I think, to many of the Swedish, Danish and Norwegian girls today, in 2025. I should STRESS that NOT ALL of these SCANDINAVIAN girls - but a high proportion - would be Fait-skinned/Blonde/Blue-eyed chix (with Nordic noses and cheekbones and jaw-lines etc, etc.)



So what's clever about the Ad is that the JEANS/GENES play on words tacitly confirms what everyone in America knows; namely that Sydney Sweeney IS a beautiful young woman AND that the BLONDE hair, BLUE-EYES and FAIR SKIN and NORDIC FACIAL FEATURES were predominantly a result of her GENETIC inheritance.



The LEFT in America hates traditional American Beauty standards, which are pretty much exemplified by Sydney Sweeney (or, for example Barie Dolls or women who look like Paris Hilton. So when Sydney Sweeney suggests - (none to subtly) - in the jeans ad, that she is beautiful (correct) and being Beautiful is a good thing - correct (because the more beautiful girls there are cruising around in society, the better life is for everyone - especially men). So, one of the reasons that America's White, Western culture is objectively superior to ALL other racial/ethnic cultures (which is true, and has been for the past 6000 years) is because , if you want to find the most BEAUTIFUL women in the world, you will find lots of them in America (and, of course Scandinavia, which is another White, Western civilisation).



If beauty in woman is largely determined by genetic facts, it mean if you are a female who has not inherited SYDNEY SWEENEY type genes, but instread you are born Black and have inherited Negro genes, which generally do not code for attractive features in women, then you are fucked. (1) You are ugly and (2) with the exception of bleaching your skin, and artificially straightening your hair, undergoing a lot of cosmetic surgery, there is very little you can do to beautify yourself.



The LEFT in AMERICA hate the fact that girls who look like Sydney Sweeney are BEAUTIFUL and they utterly crazy when anyone mentions that that BEAUTY is (to a large extent ) NOT A "SOCIAL CONSTRUCT", but rather BIOLOGICAL - hard-wired into a person's inherited DNA The White Germanic race/s (or White, Western races, if you like) have the most BEAUTIFUL women, because it is the most highly evolved race, it is the race that has developed the most refined, sophisticated and advanced culture in human history. If you rub the LEFT'S nose in this fact, they will squeel like stuck pigs and hurl every kind of disgusting slur and insult they can imagine at you NAZI, FASCIST, WHITE-SUPREMACIST HITLER; this is because they know what you are saying is correct, but they do not have the moral courage to face the truth and deal with it. After the Sydney Sweent Jeans ad went viral - another US Jean's company made a jeans ad (I think it was "Levis)" that was intended as a "riposte to the Sydney Sweeney ad. So they paid this ugly, fat, Black, slob of a woman ("Lizzo") to LOLLOP (!!) about on the set in a black bra and a pair of "Levis" jeans trying to look sexy. I though to myself, "Why would anyone think it was a clever idea to respond to the Sydney Sweeney jeans ad with this fat bitch - I thought to myself, for God's sake, I've seen better heads in the piss through at my football club during a weekend happy hour. But according to the AMERICAN LEFT and it's "BODY POSITIVE MOVEMENT" its PERFECTLY NORMAL and OK for morbidly- obese black slags, dressed in skin-tight Lycra out -fits (with Camel-toes that look the Grand Canyon) to parade themselves on camera: gyrating in a sexual manner, running their tongues over their lips in a suggestive fashion (and sucking their fingers -YUK) and running their hands all over their bodies, blowing kisses and beckoning the viewer with their index fingers. (YUCKOO !!!!) (NB: If you were a male who was crazy or desperate enough to have sex with ome of these giant, fat, BLOBS, you'd have to roll it in flower to find the CRACK !!!:p:p:p:p:p





Ordinarily, I would never have expected an ad like "American Eagle's "Jeans add (with a hottie, like Sydney Sweeney) to have been aired all over America. The JEANS/GENES hook, the ad relies on is clever, because it is TRUE that "SYDNEY SWEENEY HAS GREAT GENES". You have to have GOOD GEENS (merely) to be as PRETTY/ BEAUTIFUL a young woman as she obviously is. BADS GENES don't create BEAUTIFUL people, or any other desirable human quality or attribute or value. So, was this ad a tacit endorsement of Eugenics? Eugenics , means: "good genes", so I guess the answer to that is "Yes".




This was one reason the American LEFT immediately went "bananas." They equate anything to do with human genetics with the the Nazis Holocaust, because the Holocaust was a perverted and horrific example of Eugenics. What people forget, though, is that Hitler and the Nazis race scientists learned all of their Eugenics from American theorists. The largest, organised, eugenics movement in human history actually took place in America, mainly during the first three decades of the 20th-century. (And) it was still going strong in some states up to the late 1950s. I don't have time to discuss it here; but if do, its interesting to Google up some reading material on it.




The Sidney Sweeney Jeans add was a success because it totally triggered the American Left, who instantly screamed "blue murder", and by doing this they alerted the mainstream public, and made them curious to check out what all the fuss was about. Which they did; and because it was a well made ad, and the "American Eagle" company had pulled a pretty risky stunt (with the "JEANS/GENES" wordplay, the brand was suddenly cool and lots of kid's bought a pair of "American Eagle" jeans. I'm not 100% sure if the "American Eagle Jean Company" could have pulled off this very clever advert were it not for the fact that that at present American politics is clearly re-aligning itself with a more red-blooded Conservative region on the ideological spectrum. The way I see it , the Democrats spun out WAY, WAY to far to the crazy left, and upset a lot of people. Plus,Trump is good Leader, I think he's a "safe pair of hands", and that he's more popular than the polls suggest.




Dachshund the Wonder Hound

DLM....DACHSHUND LIVES MATTER !!
Word salad
 
Yeah, no doubt the nasty, spiteful cretins of the American Left are throwing all sorts of shit at her.

But I don't think that she came up with the "JEAN/GENES" word play the Ads were based on - which I thought was a very clever angle.

Sydney S was paid to act in the ads, the Woke/"Progressive" mob should leave her alone.

If they want to attack these ads maybe they should try putting together a rational critique of the concept/s that the ad-makers used.
 
“Sure, some TikTokers made videos calling it fascist propaganda. A Columbia University lecturer analyzed it for eugenic messaging. But when you dig into the actual numbers, when you look for the hordes of furious liberals supposedly melting down over a jeans ad... they're surprisingly hard to find.

What you can find, in abundance, is the backlash to the backlash. Vice President JD Vance gleefully telling podcast hosts that Democrats attacking Sydney Sweeney for being beautiful is “how you're going to win the midterm.” The White House communications director calling critics“warped” and “moronic.” Ted Cruz rushing to defend... a jeans commercial. Countless right-wing accounts sharing the same handful of critical TikToks as evidence of widespread liberal hysteria.

The “controversy” even spawned a completely fake apology that went viral — one that joked about American Eagle not realizing “how big her boobs would be.” People shared it as if it were real, further proof of woke insanity. But it was just some content creator having a laugh.”


The influencers I watch didn’t even mention it!
Another MAGA fake
 
They especially hate young foreign women who make older men they discarded happy.
old women become Nazis.

Reproductive suppression by older women can occur in social species where they may inhibit the reproduction of younger females, often to enhance their own offspring's survival chances. This behavior is linked to competition for resources and can be seen in various animal species, including some mammals and birds. Wikipedia BioMed Central

Understanding Reproductive Suppression by Older Women​

What is Reproductive Suppression?​

Reproductive suppression refers to the inhibition of reproduction in otherwise healthy individuals. This phenomenon can occur in various species, including humans, and is often influenced by social dynamics and environmental factors. In social groups, older women may suppress the reproductive capabilities of younger women, particularly in competitive environments.

Mechanisms of Reproductive Suppression​

  • Behavioral Mechanisms: Aggression and social hierarchies can lead to older women exerting control over younger women's reproductive choices. This can manifest as social pressure or direct competition for resources.
  • Physiological Mechanisms: Factors such as pheromone signaling can influence reproductive cycles. In some species, the presence of dominant females can disrupt the reproductive cycles of subordinates.

Evolutionary Perspective​

From an evolutionary standpoint, reproductive suppression can be beneficial. It allows older women to optimize their own reproductive success by ensuring that resources are available for their offspring. This is particularly relevant in environments where competition for resources is high.

Examples in Nature​

  • Eusocial Insects: In species like honeybees and termites, older females often suppress the reproduction of younger females to maintain social order and resource allocation.
  • Mammals: In wolf packs, older females may prevent younger females from breeding to ensure the survival of their own offspring.
In summary, reproductive suppression by older women can be understood through a combination of social dynamics and evolutionary strategies aimed at maximizing reproductive success in competitive environments.
Wikipedia
 
this is why the totalitarians created the boomer generation and then flipped the women into power, at least temporarily, to achieve their depopulation agenda.

:truestory:
 
EXACTLY. BEAUTY is an OBJECTIVE QUALITY in things. That include young women. If a young woman is truly beautiful, you "know" it the instant you set eyes on her. Experiencing BEAUTY in a woman is like feeling cold when someone presses a lump of ice against your shin. It happens instantaneously and there is nothing you can do to stop it. Same with women who are physically beautiful; when you see them or meet them you immediately feel sensations of delight, joy, wonder and other feelings that are all pleasurable/good.

The American Left has always has a beef with objective BEAUTY. It seems to be on a mission to UGLIFY America - from encouraging the spread of obesity among fat, Black women, to filling Modern Art galleries (like the TATE MODERN in London) with exhibits like: 20- foot tall , fibreglass human turds and giant, detailed, models of females' external genitalia. I MEAN, WTF IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE ??
 
“Sure, some TikTokers made videos calling it fascist propaganda. A Columbia University lecturer analyzed it for eugenic messaging. But when you dig into the actual numbers, when you look for the hordes of furious liberals supposedly melting down over a jeans ad... they're surprisingly hard to find.

What you can find, in abundance, is the backlash to the backlash. Vice President JD Vance gleefully telling podcast hosts that Democrats attacking Sydney Sweeney for being beautiful is “how you're going to win the midterm.” The White House communications director calling critics“warped” and “moronic.” Ted Cruz rushing to defend... a jeans commercial. Countless right-wing accounts sharing the same handful of critical TikToks as evidence of widespread liberal hysteria.

The “controversy” even spawned a completely fake apology that went viral — one that joked about American Eagle not realizing “how big her boobs would be.” People shared it as if it were real, further proof of woke insanity. But it was just some content creator having a laugh.”


The influencers I watch didn’t even mention it!
Another MAGA fake
cherry picking.

your ignorance is not compellilng.
 
Fourth Wave Feminism was created to give ugly women a way to destroy attractive women.

But! Still, Nobody wants the over-weight, blue-haired, ugly freaks with an nose ring and a very bad attitude. Those women are very unhappy, so they lash out at everyone around them.

Like the Trans who got their sex-bits chopped up, the Blue-Haired Freaks got Snookered by the Chicom's Destabilization Psy-Ops. Now they are miserable.

For the Normies; life, marriage, Babies, BBQs, Camping Trips, TT gaming, and grand kids... goes on.

-
 
Back
Top