Why the right can't tell the truth

T. A. Gardner said:
Could you entertain us with some examples of this...?
Click to expand...

What do you think of the last election? Was it filled with fraud or was it fair?

Did Biden win in a fair election?

If a 306-232 electoral college victory is a landslide win then what is a 306-232 electoral college victory? Wouldn't that also be a landslide?
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
What do you think of the last election? Was it filled with fraud or was it fair?

Did Biden win in a fair election?

If a 306-232 electoral college victory is a landslide win then what is a 306-232 electoral college victory? Wouldn't that also be a landslide?
Click to expand...

Let's see...

Biden won. It wasn't a "landslide." There was fraud involved, but it wasn't significant enough to change the outcome. I also know if Trump won the Democrats would be saying massive fraud was involved, just as they did in 2016...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Let's see...

Biden won. It wasn't a "landslide." There was fraud involved, but it wasn't significant enough to change the outcome. I also know if Trump won the Democrats would be saying massive fraud was involved, just as they did in 2016...
Click to expand...

When did Democrats claim massive fraud? Please provide a single story of any Democrat of note claiming massive fraud in 2016. Democrats were upset but I know of none that claimed "massive fraud."
 
There is no fraud till someone is found guilty of fraud, so show us who was found guilty of fraud in the presidential election. Doesn't exist otherwise/
 
jbander said:
The right is forced to lie because the truth is always against them. They can't take a position supportive of the hate party without lying, they can't defend a position that puts the hate party in the right on anything without lying. They couldn't even exist as a party without lying. The truth will always bury their opinions and the truth never supports their words. NO other places support my words better then these forums.
Click to expand...

Are you tired of winning yet? Winning=lying. yeah, I'm tired of it.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
When did Democrats claim massive fraud? Please provide a single story of any Democrat of note claiming massive fraud in 2016. Democrats were upset but I know of none that claimed "massive fraud."
Click to expand...

https://massivevoterfraud.com/

Nearly Half Of Democrats Think The 2016 Election Was ‘Rigged’
Click to expand...
https://thefederalist.com/2016/11/18/nearly-half-democrats-think-election-rigged/

Here’s what we know so far about voter fraud and the 2016 elections
Click to expand...
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-voting-irregularities-snap-story.html

Hillary Clinton Maintains 2016 Election ‘Was Not On the Level’: ‘We Still Don’t Know What Really Happened’
Click to expand...
https://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-maintains-2016-election-160716779.html

Yep, the Democrats top to bottom claimed there was massive voter fraud in 2016...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
https://massivevoterfraud.com/
Click to expand...
We are a small group of United States citizens that seek the truth. We are not affiliated with any political party, not Democrat,
Click to expand...
I asked for evidence of a Democrat of note claiming fraud.

https://thefederalist.com/2016/11/18/nearly-half-democrats-think-election-rigged/
Click to expand...
I asked for an actual Democrat of note claiming there was massive fraud.. A biased poll with rigged questions taken a week after the election doesn't really provide evidence of a Democrat claiming massive fraud.

https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-voting-irregularities-snap-story.html
Click to expand...
Cases of proven voter fraud in 2016, particularly those related to the presidential election, are few.
Click to expand...
:thinking: The only reports in the story are about how few cases there are and a quote from Trump about millions illegally registered to vote. Trump is not a Democrat.
https://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-maintains-2016-election-160716779.html
Click to expand...
Not a single mention of massive vote fraud there. An election not being on the level is not the same thing as massive voter fraud. In fact Clinton points out she got the majority of the popular vote.

Yep, the Democrats top to bottom claimed there was massive voter fraud in 2016...
Click to expand...
Then perhaps you can find me evidence of a single Democrat making the claim of massive voter fraud.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
I asked for evidence of a Democrat of note claiming fraud.


I asked for an actual Democrat of note claiming there was massive fraud.. A biased poll with rigged questions taken a week after the election doesn't really provide evidence of a Democrat claiming massive fraud.


:thinking: The only reports in the story are about how few cases there are and a quote from Trump about millions illegally registered to vote. Trump is not a Democrat.

Not a single mention of massive vote fraud there. An election not being on the level is not the same thing as massive voter fraud. In fact Clinton points out she got the majority of the popular vote.

Then perhaps you can find me evidence of a single Democrat making the claim of massive voter fraud.
Click to expand...

Which part of Nearly Half Of Democrats Think The 2016 Election Was ‘Rigged’ didn't you get? You never mentioned "Democrat of note," until your original premise was demolished. Then you moved the goal posts because your argument was defeated.
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
The whole premise, political platform, direction, and agenda of the TRUMP Republican Party is that of hatred and division since Donald Trump became their leader.
Click to expand...

no it's not.

intentional division is the m.o. of the frankfurt school marxists, the creators of critical race theory divide and conquer horseshit.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Which part of Nearly Half Of Democrats Think The 2016 Election Was ‘Rigged’ didn't you get? You never mentioned "Democrat of note," until your original premise was demolished. Then you moved the goal posts because your argument was defeated.
Click to expand...

I am curious how I moved the goal posts when my first unedited post here very specifically mentions "Democrat of note". But leave it to you to have to lie about it since you have been unable to meet my original request.
 
AssHatZombie said:
no it's not.

intentional division is the m.o. of the frankfurt school marxists, the creators of critical race theory divide and conquer horseshit.
Click to expand...

My suggestion- Move on from Donald Trump- DIVIDER IN CHIEF

Conquer and divide- Modus Operandi of Donald Trump!

And please go read the history of Harvard's- CRT!

That way you won't be confused by what it is, why it was created there, and how it was used there!
 
Last edited:
Geeko Sportivo said:
My suggestion- Move on from Donald Trump- CHIEF OF DIVISIONS! And please go read the history of Harvard's- CRT!

That way you won't be confused by what it is and how it was used there!
Click to expand...

all critical theory horseshit comes from the frankfurt school in germany. we can go over the idiocy of any or all of them, marcuse, adorno, some other dumbfuck.


harvard uses it for racism, as intended.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top