Why The Right Feels Dispossessed

quote-whoa-lady-i-only-speak-two-languages-english-and-bad-english-bruce-willis-135-88-44.jpg

www.whofuckincares.com
 
So its clear leftists have no problem with intellectual tripe.

That's all the Left has. They have nothing of substance to offer. Their ideas are morally vapid, their thinking emotionally riddled and puerile. When confronted with having to explain their positions you get greeted with ad hominem, insults, and even physical violence. They are intellectually bullies and children.
 
That's all the Left has. They have nothing of substance to offer. Their ideas are morally vapid, their thinking emotionally riddled and puerile. When confronted with having to explain their positions you get greeted with ad hominem, insults, and even physical violence. They are intellectually bullies and children.

Dude, you are a dope. You are no intellectual match for me. You claim to have an MA in history, but you talk like a teenager.
 
The article you dismissed is not nonsense. You don't have to agree with it, but you do not have the intellectual capacity to understand it.

You try to dismiss my position with an irrelevant appeal to authority. Show where the article has proven correct. For example, at one point, the writer brings up Alger Hiss as a boogeyman of the Right, a person persecuted rather than prosecuted on suspicion rather than fact. We now have nearly 60 years beyond that article of information that shows the author wrong--entirely wrong-- about Hiss who was actually a spy and communist collaborator with the now defunct Soviet Union.

The article is rife with such wrong examples that can now be looked back on and proven correct rather than affirmed in the author's defense.

You have nothing as rebuttal so far other than the usual insults and ad hominem. I expect nothing more from you but that.
 
You try to dismiss my position with an irrelevant appeal to authority. Show where the article has proven correct. For example, at one point, the writer brings up Alger Hiss as a boogeyman of the Right, a person persecuted rather than prosecuted on suspicion rather than fact. We now have nearly 60 years beyond that article of information that shows the author wrong--entirely wrong-- about Hiss who was actually a spy and communist collaborator with the now defunct Soviet Union.

The article is rife with such wrong examples that can now be looked back on and proven correct rather than affirmed in the author's defense.

You have nothing as rebuttal so far other than the usual insults and ad hominem. I expect nothing more from you but that.

Yes, goodnight.
 
Back
Top