countryboy
Verified User
Ralph but you are looking good too.
You agreed with Ralph, and then called him a retard.
Ralph but you are looking good too.
And I can link to several where a "good guy" killed like 50+ from the 32nd. story of a Las Vegas hotel. Or where another "good guy" killed 20 plus high school students. How about the "good guy" that killed a shop lifter.
and we're all laughed out at your idiotic stances on everything. there is no logic in you at all. worthless.


if i'm walking down the street carrying my gun, i'm safer. if my wife is walking down the street with me and she's carrying her gun, now i'm even safer and so is she.
i just proved your theory wrong.
Theyre not.Question is do you, and if you do then why are so many on the right using the Second as a defense for killing others?
Can you tell us exactly how the incident in you OP would've been prevented by mandatory background checks? Please be specific, and detailed. Tell us exactly what, in the shop owner's background would've prevented him from having a firearm, and using it in such an irresponsible manner.
Also, could you please link us to the NRA website which has bump stocks for sale.
Oh and yeah, banning bump stocks will solve the problem.
I think what we really need are restrictions on left wing loons.
^More simplistic, binary thinking from a barrel-stroking simpleton.
You agreed with Ralph, and then called him a retard.
There is such thing as left wing fascism you fucking retard.
No, I have never agreed with Ralph.
Read much?
Yes, all the time. You, evidently not so much.
If you cannot answer just say so.
Find where I ever stated that you ignorant fuck.
That’s one of the problems with you cretinous shitwads. You live in a binary world. Black and white. Everything or nothing.
Barrel stroking morons.
It's hard to find gun legislation that works equally well in Butte and Manhattan.
I've never been a big 10th Amendment / States Rights guy as few progressive liberals are.
Certain things like civil liberties must be enforced by strong central national authority.
But universal firearms legislation might be culturally a step too far.
Guns are inanimate objects that many Americans like to have,
some for sane and some for insane reasons.
At a time of horses and swords, we were the first major nation founded with guns.
Discussion on the subject is appropriate if realistic expectations are applied.
Theyre not.
The right to keep and bare arms simply expands ones ability to defend ones life and property. Law sets the parameters for deadly force.
Rights and behaviors as i said.
Sorry, but where did the law allow others to use the "Stand your ground" law to the extent that this shop owner thought he had the right to kill the shoplifter? Where do cops get the idea that they can shoot unarmed citizens in the back while they are running away, and then claim they feared for their olives? Or a 12 year old with a pellet gun?
Like all rights, if not restricted you can bet your ass that someone is going to abuse them.
Go play with your smartphone operated BBQ. Everyone here thinks you're a dickhead.
The right remains the same. The behaviors are specified.
I get that you disagree with specifications. So see to getting them changed.
But cease and desist on what you like to call rights.
The thief was wielding a hatchet.
The right wing will never admit it since common sense is not their forte, however, this is a good example of why we do need more restrictions. And please, for the useful idiot toadies, don't try to make this into gun confiscation like you NRA masters have told you:
https://abcnews.go.com/US/killed-sh...o-shows-florida-store-owner/story?id=58506648
Can you tell us exactly how the incident in you OP would've been prevented by mandatory background checks? Please be specific, and detailed. Tell us exactly what, in the shop owner's background would've prevented him from having a firearm, and using it in such an irresponsible manner.
Also, could you please link us to the NRA website which has bump stocks for sale.
Oh and yeah, banning bump stocks will solve the problem.
I think what we really need are restrictions on left wing loons.