Why won't Trump enforce the law?

Dear dunce; he is pointing out the stupidity of the thread premise that after 50 years of Democratic intransigence, to suddenly bitch about Trump enforcing laws on the books 40 days into the Presidency are hypocritical and ..... well.....moronic.

So, for 4 years you're going to A) defend every single thing Trump does and B) gush shamelessly over every speech he makes?

Yeah; that's a good use of time...
 
Because Republicans are the idiot party and have been since the Tea Party movement.

Irony; and idiot claiming others are idiots. You really are too stupid for words dumbfuck. But as always, you NEVER debate the topic, but engage in your predictable juvenile insults and accusations.

Moron.
 
Quite frankly, I think most of the Democrats and Republicans are idiots. Blind loyalty to party without regard to our nation.

Quite frankly, I think that pretending there can be no partisanship in politics is lame lazy and stupid.
 
So, for 4 years you're going to A) defend every single thing Trump does and B) gush shamelessly over every speech he makes?

Yeah; that's a good use of time...

lol.....you've already wasted several months with your obsession......are you one to talk?......
 
So, for 4 years you're going to A) defend every single thing Trump does and B) gush shamelessly over every speech he makes?

Still getting EVERYTHING wrong I see.

First; I don't defend every single thing Trump does; I defend the TRUTH and the FACTS from whiney leftist dullards who fabricate their own versions of reality and engage in sociopathic lying. In addition, I point out the glaring hypocrisy liberals engage in when they whine about "executive orders", talking to the Russians, and budget deficits.

Secondly; please show me where I am "gushing" over every speech trump makes. Once again you are engaging in lies and dishonest strawman claims removing any doubt what a rabid partisan lying leftist on steroids you really are.

Yeah; that's a good use of time...

You're not clever or intelligent enough to comprehend the IRONY of this comment are you?

:rofl2:
 
"There's a big difference between that and recreational marijuana. When you see something like the opioid addiction crisis blossoming around so many states around this country, the last thing we should be doing is encouraging people ... there's still a federal law that we need to abide by when it comes to recreational marijuana." - Sean Spicer

Marijuana is a schedule 1 drug meaning federal law makes no distinction between medical and recreational use. I wonder how much power Trump has to enforce a law in what is clearly a politically biased way. Sure, the President can set enforcement priorities but to ignore the law and only go after marijuana in those states with recreational (which just so happens to be states he did not do well in) should not be constitutional.

I would love to see a system in which pot dealers and users are fine equivalent to their total net worth.

Say you are a rich boy with 100 million - Poof gone, no jail time.

Say you are a useless stoner with a worthless 1982 chevy vega and 20 bucks in your pocket - poof gone.

They get to keep the clothes on their backs - everything else confiscated and either auctioned off to help pay for welfare to support pot heads or in the case of the '82 chevy, junked.
 
Because Republicans are the idiot party and have been since the Tea Party movement.

And now that honour belongs completely and irrefutably to the Democrats. The difference is, you guys really underscore d-e-s-p-e-r-a-t-i-o-n in bold.

Hahahaaaaa! Looks good on you, Miccy!
 
I would love to see a system in which pot dealers and users are fine equivalent to their total net worth.

Say you are a rich boy with 100 million - Poof gone, no jail time.

Say you are a useless stoner with a worthless 1982 chevy vega and 20 bucks in your pocket - poof gone.

They get to keep the clothes on their backs - everything else confiscated and either auctioned off to help pay for welfare to support pot heads or in the case of the '82 chevy, junked.

They kind of do that (confiscation of assets) already, though many believe it to be unconstitutional.
 
Dear dunce; he is pointing out the stupidity of the thread premise that after 50 years of Democratic intransigence, to suddenly bitch about Trump enforcing laws on the books 40 days into the Presidency are hypocritical and ..... well.....moronic.

And which they are profoundly, completely, and decidedly, again, LOSERS.
 
Back
Top