Why Working Women Are Worse Off Under Kamala Harris

Libhater

Libhater

Verified User
One of the many biggest whoppers by Democrats is that they say a Harris presidency would usher in a golden era of economic
prosperity for working women.

Under Harris and Biden, women have faced unprecedented pay cuts, inflation, tax hikes, and an economic disaster that's setting
records for all the wrong reasons. Meanwhile, President Trump provided the most robust economic boost for women that we've
seen in modern times.

During Trump's presidency, medium income for women surged every year, peaking at an all time high in 2020. Real average weekly
earnings climbed by 8.2% under Trump, whereas they dropped by 3.9% once Harris and Biden took over.

Unemployment rates for women and Black women (isn't kamala a black woman?) hit record lows during Trump's tenure, and the
gender workforce participation gap shrank to its narrowest ever, and that happened without him (Trump) using leftist DEI madness.
Trump's economy broke records with the highest number of women in the workforce.


ps: I wonder if the endangered leftist species of OWL WOMAN and OWL WOMEN would be the least bit upset, worried or concerned
that their potus preference (kamala) is and has been a complete disaster for working women.

e4wgrox5nlxivfiggbkg_800.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
Libhater said:
One of the many biggest whoppers by Democrats is that they say a Harris presidency would usher in a golden era of economic
prosperity for working women.

Under Harris and Biden, women have faced unprecedented pay cuts, inflation, tax hikes, and an economic disaster that's setting
records for all the wrong reasons. Meanwhile, President Trump provided the most robust economic boost for women that we've
seen in modern times.

During Trump's presidency, medium income for women surged every year, peaking at an all time high in 2020. Real average weekly
earnings climbed by 8.2% under Trump, whereas they dropped by 3.9% once Harris and Biden took over.

Unemployment rates for women and Black women (isn't kamala a black woman?) hit record lows during Trump's tenure, and the
gender workforce participation gap shrank to its narrowest ever, and that happened without him (Trump) using leftist DEI madness.
Trump's economy broke records with the highest number of women in the workforce.


ps: I wonder if the endangered leftist species of OWL WOMAN and OWL WOMEN would be the least bit upset, worried or concerned
that their potus preference (kamala) is and has been a complete disaster for working women.

View attachment 31183
Click to expand...
83.567% of your post is false.
 
Hume said:
You post stats with no reference. Useless.
Click to expand...
Perhaps the only thing at this forum that is totally useless is having you respond to most every post by me or by
any other common sense Conservative with a diversionary or avoidance tactic that shows just how ignorant you
are concerning any kind of political conversation or debate. Take a hike fella.
 
Libhater said:
Perhaps the only thing at this forum that is totally useless is having you respond to most every post by me or by
any other common sense Conservative with a diversionary or avoidance tactic that shows just how ignorant you
are concerning any kind of political conversation or debate. Take a hike fella.
Click to expand...
65.34667% of your post is false.
 
Libhater said:
One of the many biggest whoppers by Democrats is that they say a Harris presidency would usher in a golden era of economic
prosperity for working women.

Under Harris and Biden, women have faced unprecedented pay cuts, inflation, tax hikes, and an economic disaster that's setting
records for all the wrong reasons. Meanwhile, President Trump provided the most robust economic boost for women that we've
seen in modern times.

During Trump's presidency, medium income for women surged every year, peaking at an all time high in 2020. Real average weekly
earnings climbed by 8.2% under Trump, whereas they dropped by 3.9% once Harris and Biden took over.

Unemployment rates for women and Black women (isn't kamala a black woman?) hit record lows during Trump's tenure, and the
gender workforce participation gap shrank to its narrowest ever, and that happened without him (Trump) using leftist DEI madness.
Trump's economy broke records with the highest number of women in the workforce.


ps: I wonder if the endangered leftist species of OWL WOMAN and OWL WOMEN would be the least bit upset, worried or concerned
that their potus preference (kamala) is and has been a complete disaster for working women.
Click to expand...
No link? I think I know why..
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Everyone but the rich and big corporations are worse off under Biden - Harris...
Click to expand...
Sure that was because of the huge tax cuts and regulation slashing she did. Oh wait, that was daffy who did that and he is promising to do it again bigger and better if he can cheat his way into office.
 
Nordberg said:
Sure that was because of the huge tax cuts and regulation slashing she did. Oh wait, that was daffy who did that and he is promising to do it again bigger and better if he can cheat his way into office.
Click to expand...
Got news for you... More regulation in the market favors big corporations and raises the bar to entry for startups and small corporations. More taxes in a byzantine labyrinth of government regulations favors the rich who can navigate them and avoid paying compared to those with fewer choices, means, and ability to fully navigate the rules.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Got news for you... More regulation in the market favors big corporations and raises the bar to entry for startups and small corporations. More taxes in a byzantine labyrinth of government regulations favors the rich who can navigate them and avoid paying compared to those with fewer choices, means, and ability to fully navigate the rules.
Click to expand...
but you're for some corporate regulation right?

like anti-child labor laws?
 
Libhater said:
One of the many biggest whoppers by Democrats is that they say a Harris presidency would usher in a golden era of economic
prosperity for working women.

Under Harris and Biden, women have faced unprecedented pay cuts, inflation, tax hikes, and an economic disaster that's setting
records for all the wrong reasons. Meanwhile, President Trump provided the most robust economic boost for women that we've
seen in modern times.

During Trump's presidency, medium income for women surged every year, peaking at an all time high in 2020. Real average weekly
earnings climbed by 8.2% under Trump, whereas they dropped by 3.9% once Harris and Biden took over.

Unemployment rates for women and Black women (isn't kamala a black woman?) hit record lows during Trump's tenure, and the
gender workforce participation gap shrank to its narrowest ever, and that happened without him (Trump) using leftist DEI madness.
Trump's economy broke records with the highest number of women in the workforce.


ps: I wonder if the endangered leftist species of OWL WOMAN and OWL WOMEN would be the least bit upset, worried or concerned
that their potus preference (kamala) is and has been a complete disaster for working women.

View attachment 31183
Click to expand...

One thing we know for certain about Trump is that he is more than happy to make women like E. Jean Carrol wealthier.
 
Libhater said:
See if you can link up with all the working women here in the U.S. so you could get a chance to ask them directly
how their financial lives of today are sizing up to their financial lives during Trump's presidency.
Click to expand...

I think what American women MOST want these days is to see the GOP go hammer and tongs after a strong woman and automatically assume that if she succeeded in life as a woman it was because she was a whore.

There's nothing that says "care about women" more than screaming "WHORE" whenever a woman shows up on the national stage.

Especially after the same party just got done eliminating most women's bodily autonomy.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Got news for you... More regulation in the market favors big corporations and raises the bar to entry for startups and small corporations. More taxes in a byzantine labyrinth of government regulations favors the rich who can navigate them and avoid paying compared to those with fewer choices, means, and ability to fully navigate the rules.
Click to expand...
That is not news. it is wrong. Corporations make greater profits if they gut regulation. The corporate credo is to maximize profits as quickly as possible. The huge corporations buy up successful startups. Competition is not wanted. One of the reasons our corps moved to China was because they had no regulations especially environmental ones.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top