Why Working Women Are Worse Off Under Kamala Harris

That is not news. it is wrong. Corporations make greater profits if they gut regulation. The corporate credo is to maximize profits as quickly as possible. The huge corporations buy up successful startups. Competition is not wanted. One of the reasons our corps moved to China was because they had no regulations especially environmental ones.
You are dead flat wrong. More regulation favors bigger corporations and companies already well entrenched in the market. This is because they have the means to navigate and work with those regulations at a lower cost. Start ups and small businesses are hurt by regulations because they have to use a larger portion of their profits to manage those things.






It's called Economy of Scale. Larger corporations can spread the cost of regulations out over more areas of productivity than a small corporation or business.

It's really no different with income taxes. The rich have more options being able to invest their money in more ways and itemize their tax returns. Persons of lower income have fewer options and often don't make enough to itemize so they end up paying a flat rate tax.
 
You are dead flat wrong. More regulation favors bigger corporations and companies already well entrenched in the market. This is because they have the means to navigate and work with those regulations at a lower cost. Start ups and small businesses are hurt by regulations because they have to use a larger portion of their profits to manage those things.






It's called Economy of Scale. Larger corporations can spread the cost of regulations out over more areas of productivity than a small corporation or business.

It's really no different with income taxes. The rich have more options being able to invest their money in more ways and itemize their tax returns. Persons of lower income have fewer options and often don't make enough to itemize so they end up paying a flat rate tax.
The economy of scale was what was taught in economics classes generations ago. The corporations used their power over the markets and the politicians to warp it into "they win, completion and the consumer lose".
 
The economy of scale was what was taught in economics classes generations ago. The corporations used their power over the markets and the politicians to warp it into "they win, completion and the consumer lose".
Seems to me it's still being taught in universities today, because it is valid and accurate.


Big corporations collude with government to prevent or reduce competition. Even certain markets will collude with government to prevent new competition. They do this with regulations, licensing, and other government actions that cost money and take time to comply with. Bigger companies have an advantage. They can reduce their profit margin and still make big globs of money even if they're only making pennies on the dollar. A small company can't do that.
 
That is not news. it is wrong. Corporations make greater profits if they gut regulation. The corporate credo is to maximize profits as quickly as possible. The huge corporations buy up successful startups. Competition is not wanted. One of the reasons our corps moved to China was because they had no regulations especially environmental ones.

Yup. Without the regulations corporate America would have almost no motivation to care about the environment or the health of the worker or consumer.

I'm sure SOME companies would still try to be decent on their own but enough wouldn't that we'd wind up with more Love Canals and the cycle starts again. The demand for more regulations.

That's why we have all these regulations: PEOPLE WANTED THEM.
 
Back
Top