Will Democrats cave before SNAP/EBT/Section 8 funds run out?

Will Democrats cave before SNAP/EBT/Section 8 run out?

  • Total voters
    4
Trump lied. From mexiquinn.com/did-mexico-pay-for-the-wall-the-truth-revealed/

No, Mexico did not directly pay for the U.S.-Mexico border wall. Despite campaign promises, the wall was funded by American taxpayers through federal allocations and reprogrammed military funds.

🧱 What Was Promised vs. What Happened​

  • Trump’s 2016 Promise: Mexico would pay for a “big, beautiful wall.”
  • Reality: No direct payment from Mexico ever occurred. The U.S. government funded construction through:
    • Congressional appropriations
    • Reallocated Pentagon funds
    • Emergency declarations

📊 Wall Construction Stats​

  • Total built: ~450 miles of barriers during Trump’s term
  • New wall (not replacement): Only ~47 miles were built where no barrier previously existed.
Mexico did not write a check, and Trump’s administration falsely claimed indirect forms of “payment” through cooperation and policy shifts.
 
Jake Starkey said:
Telling the truthful facts, which I did, is not ad hom, podjo.
Click to expand...
Examples of Ad Hominem Circumstantial:

  1. Of course you think that, you work for that company.
  2. Your argument is biased because you are a member of that political party.
  3. Your argument is invalid because you stand to benefit from it financially.
  4. We can’t take your argument seriously because you have a personal grudge against the other party.
englishleaflet.com

What is Ad Hominem? Types, Examples & Functions - EnglishLeaflet

Ad hominem is a Latin phrase that means "to the person." In logic and rhetoric, ad hominem refers to a fallacy that is committed when someone attacks the
englishleaflet.com englishleaflet.com

That's what you did. You attacked the sources I used based on their perceived political leanings and affiliations. That is ad hominem and it isn't "facts," it's bullshit disguised as an argument.

You refuted NOTHING! Your argument was and is invalid. You have given no rebuttal whatsoever.
 
"I live in one of the most expensive states in the country and I have been on SNAP before. We followed every law, filled out everything correctly. We were only on it for 6-9 months. If you are mad it is getting shut down you should probably place that anger towards the Democrats who are keeping the Government shut down. Maybe you should be mad at the Democrats who are holding money hostage while they continue to pay themselves."



https://twitter.com/x/status/1982927787578339537
View: https://x.com/AmericaPapaBear/status/1982927787578339537
 
G4TYPZVW0AAjPW_
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Examples of Ad Hominem Circumstantial:

  1. Of course you think that, you work for that company.
  2. Your argument is biased because you are a member of that political party.
  3. Your argument is invalid because you stand to benefit from it financially.
  4. We can’t take your argument seriously because you have a personal grudge against the other party.
englishleaflet.com

What is Ad Hominem? Types, Examples & Functions - EnglishLeaflet

Ad hominem is a Latin phrase that means "to the person." In logic and rhetoric, ad hominem refers to a fallacy that is committed when someone attacks the
englishleaflet.com englishleaflet.com

That's what you did. You attacked the sources I used based on their perceived political leanings and affiliations. That is ad hominem and it isn't "facts," it's bullshit disguised as an argument.

You refuted NOTHING! Your argument was and is invalid. You have given no rebuttal whatsoever.
Click to expand...

I don't have to rebut non-factual arguments based on philosophy and political leanings. My comments were factual. This is your problem. That is you gaslighting, bud.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Examples of Ad Hominem Circumstantial:

  1. Of course you think that, you work for that company.
  2. Your argument is biased because you are a member of that political party.
  3. Your argument is invalid because you stand to benefit from it financially.
  4. We can’t take your argument seriously because you have a personal grudge against the other party.
englishleaflet.com

What is Ad Hominem? Types, Examples & Functions - EnglishLeaflet

Ad hominem is a Latin phrase that means "to the person." In logic and rhetoric, ad hominem refers to a fallacy that is committed when someone attacks the
englishleaflet.com englishleaflet.com

That's what you did. You attacked the sources I used based on their perceived political leanings and affiliations. That is ad hominem and it isn't "facts," it's bullshit disguised as an argument.

You refuted NOTHING! Your argument was and is invalid. You have given no rebuttal whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Your 'rebuttal' was based on your political philosophy, not facts. You tried to gaslight and failed.
 
Jake Starkey said:
I don't have to rebut non-factual arguments based on philosophy and political leanings. My comments were factual. This is your problem. That is you gaslighting, bud.
Click to expand...
Another term you don't know how to use.

gaslighting
[ˈɡaslʌɪtɪŋ]
noun
gaslighting (noun)
  1. the practice of psychologically manipulating someone into questioning their own sanity, memory, or powers of reasoning

what-is-gaslighting-infographic-1024x583.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top