Will Obama act like a man?

signalmankenneth

Verified User
Will Obama act like a man?
Justice Stevens to retire this summer

Already, the snarling dogs are DEMANDING that Obama appoint somebody THEY like. In the past, Obama has bent over for them every time and I'm so tired of the surrenders. His premier goal seems to be to get the snarling dogs to like him, which will never happen. The sooner he understands that, the sooner he can become a great president.

Bush appointed the two most radical (and young) handjobs he could find.
When he did, the Dems ALL said, "He should get whoever he wants."

Now the shoe is on the oither foot and I expect Obama to dive in to their demands. No matter who he appoints, the snarling dogs will say, "He's the most radical Stalinist in America," so why should Obama even try to make the sons of bitches happy?

Of course, the proper answer to their demands is, "Go fuck yourself, I won the elecion and, just like Bush, I'll appoint whoever I f-ing want," but Obama's primary goal is to be liked by the snarling dogs.

How do you get into politics if your primary goal is to placate the snarling dogs? Obama has shown no hesitation to piss off his base so expect to be disappointed.

These are the bastards Obama's trying to win over:

drudge-attacks-410.jpg



Why does Obama try to make the snarling dogs happy? At our expense?
BartCop

My problem with Mr. Obama is he is to accommodating for my tatse! signalmankenneth
 
what is truly sad is that you are the embodiment of the perpetuation of dividing the country for the sole purpose of expanding the governments power. An act that has been continuing since 1802. Until you can open your ears and your eyes to your willfully ignorant submission to federal power, you are nothing more than part of the problem.
 
Will Obama act like a man?
Justice Stevens to retire this summer

Already, the snarling dogs are DEMANDING that Obama appoint somebody THEY like. In the past, Obama has bent over for them every time and I'm so tired of the surrenders. His premier goal seems to be to get the snarling dogs to like him, which will never happen. The sooner he understands that, the sooner he can become a great president.

Bush appointed the two most radical (and young) handjobs he could find.
When he did, the Dems ALL said, "He should get whoever he wants."

Now the shoe is on the oither foot and I expect Obama to dive in to their demands. No matter who he appoints, the snarling dogs will say, "He's the most radical Stalinist in America," so why should Obama even try to make the sons of bitches happy?

Of course, the proper answer to their demands is, "Go fuck yourself, I won the elecion and, just like Bush, I'll appoint whoever I f-ing want," but Obama's primary goal is to be liked by the snarling dogs.

How do you get into politics if your primary goal is to placate the snarling dogs? Obama has shown no hesitation to piss off his base so expect to be disappointed.

These are the bastards Obama's trying to win over:

drudge-attacks-410.jpg



Why does Obama try to make the snarling dogs happy? At our expense?
BartCop

My problem with Mr. Obama is he is to accommodating for my tatse! signalmankenneth


Unfortunately I agree with you 100%....Obama just doesn't get it....he's under worse assault than Slick Willy...and Clinton did MORE for the conservative/corporate cause than they like to admit!

The bastards the Shrub fronted for stuffed the Attorney Generals offices around the country with little Bob Jones trained acolytes, and we know what Alito, Thomas and the other SOB's are about. Obama better have an apithany about his "centrist" attitude and realize wtf is going on and do what he can to equalize the odds in the favor of democracy.
 
The bastards the Shrub fronted for stuffed the Attorney Generals offices around the country with little Bob Jones trained acolytes, and we know what Alito, Thomas and the other SOB's are about. Obama better have an apithany about his "centrist" attitude and realize wtf is going on and do what he can to equalize the odds in the favor of democracy.

the bolded portion.....you're so fricking wrong it's absolutely disgusting.
 
what is truly sad is that you are the embodiment of the perpetuation of dividing the country for the sole purpose of expanding the governments power. An act that has been continuing since 1802. Until you can open your ears and your eyes to your willfully ignorant submission to federal power, you are nothing more than part of the problem.

I think you mean 1801, since that's when the Jeffersonians took over wrunning the country.
 
its pretty stupid for the gop to talk about fighting anyone yet...it just looks divisive and whiny when there is nothing to be divisive about yet...

lets see who he picks first
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
The bastards the Shrub fronted for stuffed the Attorney Generals offices around the country with little Bob Jones trained acolytes, and we know what Alito, Thomas and the other SOB's are about. Obama better have an apithany about his "centrist" attitude and realize wtf is going on and do what he can to equalize the odds in the favor of democracy.

the bolded portion.....you're so fricking wrong it's absolutely disgusting.

Yes, yes.....and I'm sure we're all waiting with baited breath as you muster up a brilliant, fact laden explanation of your expressed opinion. :rolleyes:
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Yes, yes.....and I'm sure we're all waiting with baited breath as you muster up a brilliant, fact laden explanation of your expressed opinion.

all one needs to do is read his dissent in gonzales v. raich to know where he stands on congressional and constitutional limits.

All YOU need to do is stop stalling and make a clear, declarative statement instead of generalizations. If you're going to waste time and space repeating teabagger rhetoric about Obama destroying the Constitution, then you've got nothing of worth to discuss.
 
Back
Top