DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
The House just voted 245-189 for repeal.
Yes, they are, at least by standard measures of population density (people/area). And 80+% of the US population is in urban areas.
If you're looking for better results check http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds...xpectancy#met=sp_dyn_le00_in&idim=country:USA
Life expectancy is longer in Australia, France, Canada, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom....I can continue if you wish.
You can believe that this was about "facts", if you wish; but then, you are use to being in a round room.
Yeah that's why they voted the Democrats out last November.
That too. Plus the deficit.It had to do with more that just health care. Maybe jobs? What do you think?
Have you seen the polls lately? Less people are against HCR than when it was first passed. The truth is slowly getting out.
The public option that will come at a later date will solve these problems.
Now they can explain that one all by its self without alot death panel lies and government takeover lies to fight against.
It's interesting that the republicans are letting the press call it only 'repeal' when it mandates replacement as a requisite. Basically they are letting others control the "message" and losing therefore.
Of what?Cite?
Of what?
Have you read the text of the bill and the concurrently passed H.Res 9?Whatever you base your claim that "'it' mandates replacement."
Have you read the text of the bill and the concurrently passed H.Res 9?
It's interesting that the republicans are letting the press call it only 'repeal' when it mandates replacement as a requisite. Basically they are letting others control the "message" and losing therefore.
Wouldn't it have made sense to have the replacement ready when they introduced the bill if this is what it mandated?
It would prove to the "people" that they do, indeed a have a better replacement.
Why are they wasting time on this.
They threaten to defund it, why not take that route?