Hello Robo,
How wrong could you be?
Wrong. It was not impeachment hearings.
Wrong The Mueller Report is quite real.
Wrong. Robert Mueller attests to it's accuracy.
Wrong. He is not suspicious at all. He is a well respected public servant.
Wrong.
"Weissmann has a bachelor's degree from Princeton University (1980). Following a Fulbright scholarship to the University of Geneva, he attended and graduated from Columbia Law School (1984). He then clerked for Judge Eugene Nickerson in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.[2]
From 1991 to 2002, Weissmann worked in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York. While there he tried more than 25 cases involving members of the Genovese, Colombo and Gambino crime families.[1] He led the prosecution team in the Vincent Gigante case, in which Gigante was convicted.[3]
From 2002 to 2005, Weissmann was deputy director and then director of the task force investigating the Enron scandal.[1] His work resulted in the prosecution of more than 30 people for crimes including perjury, fraud, and obstruction including three of Enron's top executives, Andrew Fastow, Kenneth Lay. and Jeffrey Skilling. In a follow-up case in U.S. District Court, Weissmann also was successful at arguing that auditing firm Arthur Andersen LLP had covered up for Enron. In that case, which resulted in the destruction of Andersen, he convinced the district judge to instruct the jury that they could convict the firm regardless of whether its employees knew they were violating the law.[3] That ruling was later unanimously overturned by the Supreme Court in Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, in which the court held that "the jury instructions failed to convey the requisite consciousness of wrongdoing."[3]
In 2005 Weissmann worked as special counsel under Mueller at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, then went into private practice at Jenner & Block in New York. In 2011 he returned to the FBI, serving as General Counsel under Mueller.[4] Since 2015 he has headed the criminal fraud section at DOJ. Weissmann has taught at NYU School of Law, Fordham Law School, and Brooklyn Law School.[2]
On June 19, 2017, Weissmann joined Special Counsel Mueller's team in investigating Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.[5][6] He was said to be "the architect of the case against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort." A news report in March 2019 said he would soon leave the Justice Department and become a faculty member at New York University and to work on public service projects.[7] " -wiki
Wrong. He was guided by
DOJ order 3915-2017 Appointment of the Special Counsel To Investigate Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential Election
Wrong. See the DOJ order to investigate Russian interference.
Correct. Digging into the Clinton campaign and looking for wrongdoing is not part of Russian interference into the election. It was clear the Russians were not trying to help the Clinton campaign.
Wrong. That's a made-up opinion which is not based in verifiable fact.
Wrong. Bias evident.
Wrong. Fabricated and unsupported. Fake news.
Wrong. That was only a small part of the agenda.
Wrong. When Mueller was chosen, he was praised by both sides as being fair and impartial. And that is how he carried out is mission, which was evident in his testimony.
Wrong. This is purely conjecture and not supported by fact. WE learned no such thing. YOU have attempted to establish it, but failed.
Wrong. You are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts.
Wrong 14 out of 15 times. Your version of things bears little resemblance to reality. But I get it. That is Trump's world. The only way to remain supportive of President Trump is to buy in to his alternate version of reality, which is not based in fact, but innuendo. This is evident by the way the story keeps changing, such as Trump's praise for Wikleaks during the campaign, and his later criticism of Wikileaks. Trump's version of events is constantly altered to fit the current narrative. Another example would be when President Trump claimed 'total and complete exoneration' upon the release of the Mueller Report, but then later walked that back and claimed that a prosecutor cannot actually exonerate anybody.
Good old Gym, shuts his eyes to corruption the same way he did to sexual assault.
