WILL TRUMP DEPORT ILHAN OMAR ??

What will say when it's proven? Will you say you're a dumbass?
Better pucker your ass, because that's coming.
Smith-Mundt Act restoration too.
Good stuff. :)
It’s been circulating for years you stupid fuck. Debunked many times.

This guy is 3 years younger than her and her mother died when she was 2. When the family arrived in the country when she was 13, he was never listed as a sibling of anyone.

Keep struggling, motherfucker. It’s amusing.
 
I sure hope he tries it! That would be awesome - deporting a representative Americans elected? Please do :)


I know what you mean, Lurch.

But the asshole, Trump, and the assholes who are his continuing supporters are so fucked up, I doubt they will do more than continue with the lies. Representative Omar frightens the roaches of the Right. She is a woman; she is black; she is more intelligent than the more intelligent of them...and she tells it like it is about the Moron-in-Chief.

Sounds to me as though they are suffering.

Great.

:happydance:


You are NOT a citizen if you got citizenship thru fraud. THINK.

I hope so. She's clearly a terrorist front rep and dangerous to our country. We also need to deport those that voted for her and everybody who has supported her.

She allegedly lied to become a citizen. That could get her anyone who did that deported.
Pretty sure it happened a few days ago. Possibly to "Kalil"?

You need to see Kavorkian

What will say when it's proven? Will you say you're a dumbass?
Better pucker your ass, because that's coming.
Smith-Mundt Act restoration too.
Good stuff. :)
 
This whole story about Omar and her husband-brother could easily be resolved by a simple cheek swab of Ilhan Omar and her brother and now former husband. Unless for some reason she does not what DNA proof? The big question I now that she is divorced is he still her brother?
 
This whole story about Omar and her husband-brother could easily be resolved by a simple cheek swab of Ilhan Omar and her brother and now former husband. Unless for some reason she does not what DNA proof? The big question I now that she is divorced is he still her brother?
Ask a West Virginian that went through the same thing. 😆
"She broke up with me but said we could still be cousins."
 
One of the U.S.' longest and most wealthy dynasties was famous for its interbreeding with family, and in fact deliberately sought out cousins for their children to marry over several generations. It kept the wealth and family management in the family, not unlike European aristocrats and Royalty. Not to say these terrorist trash are comparable to the Du Pont family, just an historical fact.
 
One of the U.S.' longest and most wealthy dynasties was famous for its interbreeding with family, and in fact deliberately sought out cousins for their children to marry over several generations. It kept the wealth and family management in the family, not unlike European aristocrats and Royalty. Not to say these terrorist trash are comparable to the Du Pont family, just an historical fact.
Which one was that?
 
Which one was that?

AI Overview
1758635793203.jpeg
1758635793214.png
1758635793225.png
+6

The du Pont family began in France with Pierre Samuel du Pont, a French economist who emigrated to the U.S. in 1800 with his sons. One son, Éleuthère Irénée du Pont, founded a successful gunpowder mill in Delaware in 1802, which grew into a massive chemical conglomerate. The family became one of the wealthiest in the U.S., diversifying into chemicals, material science, and other industries, but also faced controversy for issues like environmental pollution, involvement in the slave economy, and an antitrust breakup in 1912.

FAmily tree:



Founding and Early Growth (18th-19th Centuries)
  • French Roots:
    Pierre Samuel du Pont was a French economist and philosopher who moved to the U.S. in 1800, seeking better opportunities.

  • Gunpowder Mill:
    In 1802, his son, Éleuthère Irénée du Pont, established the first du Pont gunpowder mill on the Brandywine River in Delaware.

  • Wartime Profits:
    The company profited significantly from gunpowder sales to the U.S. government during the War of 1812 and the American Civil War.
    • This fails to mention they personally limited their profits on their armament sales to 5%, unlike many other munitions and military contractors. They've pretty much been very patriotic, unlike many other wealthy families.
Diversification and Corporate Power (Late 19th-20th Centuries)
With their immense profits, the family diversified, expanding into a world-leading chemical corporation.


The 20th century saw major innovations, with DuPont developing groundbreaking materials like neoprene, nylon, and Teflon.


In 1912, the du Pont company faced an antitrust breakup for its monopoly in the explosives industry, leading to the creation of new companies and greater diversification.


The family also made significant strategic investments, notably in General Motors, further increasing their wealth.
 
Last edited:
LOL

You sad fucks are just like Lucy, Charlie Brown and the football. No matter how many times that football is pulled out from under you, you just keep coming back for more.

This is merely another iteration of the Obama birther bullshit.

I see the facts about this democrat anti American-anti Semite illegal bitch hasn't yet registered in your vacuous brain.
 
AI Overview
View attachment 60404
View attachment 60405
View attachment 60406
+6

The du Pont family began in France with Pierre Samuel du Pont, a French economist who emigrated to the U.S. in 1800 with his sons. One son, Éleuthère Irénée du Pont, founded a successful gunpowder mill in Delaware in 1802, which grew into a massive chemical conglomerate. The family became one of the wealthiest in the U.S., diversifying into chemicals, material science, and other industries, but also faced controversy for issues like environmental pollution, involvement in the slave economy, and an antitrust breakup in 1912.


Founding and Early Growth (18th-19th Centuries)
  • French Roots:
    Pierre Samuel du Pont was a French economist and philosopher who moved to the U.S. in 1800, seeking better opportunities.

  • Gunpowder Mill:
    In 1802, his son, Éleuthère Irénée du Pont, established the first du Pont gunpowder mill on the Brandywine River in Delaware.

  • Wartime Profits:
    The company profited significantly from gunpowder sales to the U.S. government during the War of 1812 and the American Civil War.
Diversification and Corporate Power (Late 19th-20th Centuries)
With their immense profits, the family diversified, expanding into a world-leading chemical corporation.


The 20th century saw major innovations, with DuPont developing groundbreaking materials like neoprene, nylon, and Teflon.


In 1912, the du Pont company faced an antitrust breakup for its monopoly in the explosives industry, leading to the creation of new companies and greater diversification.


The family also made significant strategic investments, notably in General Motors, further increasing their wealth.
Them fuckers. Every few years they come up with a new refrigerant then bribe the government to make buying theirs mandatory.
They were responsible for the "Ozone hole" R-12 going away bullshit, and have pulled the same thing several times since then.
Now the fuckers are using flammable refrigerant. Not propane, fuck no. Some stuff they cooked up.
Proprietary stuff they have a patent for that doesn't work as good as things in the past. R-12. R-22, R-134A.
The DuPonts are all about monopolies.
 
Them fuckers. Every few years they come up with a new refrigerant then bribe the government to make buying theirs mandatory.
They were responsible for the "Ozone hole" R-12 going away bullshit, and have pulled the same thing several times since then.
Now the fuckers are using flammable refrigerant. Not propane, fuck no. Some stuff they cooked up.
Proprietary stuff they have a patent for that doesn't work as good as things in the past. R-12. R-22, R-134A.

They don't run those companies any more, haven't for a while now. I can't find where they had anything to do with the ozone stuff; the companies merely adapted to the political fads of the day. In fact they hired PR people to reject the ozone layer research.

AI Overview



No, DuPont did not finance an ozone layer hoax in the 1970s. In fact, scientific research has confirmed that ozone depletion is real and was caused by chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), for which DuPont was a major manufacturer
. However, as the world's leading producer of CFCs, DuPont engaged in a public relations campaign in the 1970s to cast doubt on the science linking the chemicals to ozone damage.

The scientific consensus on ozone depletion
  • 1974: Chemists Mario Molina and Sherwood Rowland published a paper in the journal Nature detailing the theory that CFCs could break down in the stratosphere and release chlorine, which would destroy the ozone layer.
  • 1978: The U.S. government banned the use of CFCs in aerosol sprays, but still allowed their use in refrigerants and other products.
  • 1985: A British team of researchers reported a severe springtime hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica, a finding later confirmed by NASA.
  • 1988: After reviewing the overwhelming evidence, DuPont announced it would phase out CFC production. The international Montreal Protocol, an agreement to protect the ozone layer, was ratified the same year.
  • Nobel Prize: The scientific work that demonstrated the harm of CFCs was later awarded the Nobel Prize.
DuPont's initial denial and reversal
  • Initial resistance: After Molina and Rowland's 1974 paper, DuPont spent millions on full-page newspaper ads defending CFCs and claiming there was no proof they harmed the ozone layer. A DuPont chairman even called the ozone theory a "science fiction tale" and "utter nonsense".
  • Development of alternatives: By 1986, DuPont had developed alternative chemicals that did not harm the ozone layer. This placed the company in a better position to accept and even support a ban on CFCs, as they could then market their newer, more profitable products.
  • Phase-out: In 1988, in response to growing scientific certainty and the threat of regulation, DuPont reversed its position and became a strong advocate for the global phase-out of CFCs.
Debunking the "hoax" theory
Conspiracy theories claiming that ozone depletion is a hoax sometimes suggest that the replacement chemicals were more expensive and that the industry, including DuPont, profited from the switch. However, the international regulations were a direct response to solid scientific evidence, not a manufactured crisis.

The widely ratified Montreal Protocol and the subsequent healing of the ozone layer, confirmed by extensive scientific observation, provide conclusive evidence that ozone depletion was a real and severe environmental problem caused by human-made chemicals.
 
Back
Top