Will We, Can We, We Shall, Survive




I was reading the "Social Credit Score" (SCS) system they are rolling out in China. If you are not familiar with it, basically, all of China's 1.4 billion citizen will have a SCS assigned by the governtment (the Chinese Communist Party).


Everyone starts with, say, 1000 points, of Social Credit. If your behaviour is good, you will have points added to your SCS; if it is not good, you will have points deducted.



What behaviours are good or approved of, and what behaviours are not approved of or bad, are determined by the state (the Chinese Communist Party).



Now, here's the scarey bit. The system works by using high-tech surveillance networks. For example, individuals can be physically monited in public through face-recognition spyware; all of the data an individual receives or creates and sends on the internet through iPhones, lap-tops, social media platforms (Twitter, "What's App", etc) is monitored. 5G networks/technology are currently expanding the range and levels of intrusivity of this centralized government surveillance of individuals/families in China.




This is a real-world example of the terrifying totalitarian technocracy depicted novels like "Brave New World" (1932) and "Nineteen Eighty Four" (1949). These novels were, as you know written as dystopian science fiction, but the reality of this Social Credit Score (SCS) system that has already been implemented in China,- and is now becoming more sophisticated and comprehensive with every day- is not fiction.



To give you an example... suppose you are a Chinese citizen and you make a comment to a friend on your IPhone that is critical of President XI (suppose you call him "Pooh Bear" which was one of his nick-names in China until he took offense and banned it!) or suppose you you write an article or essay for an on-line mazagine that contains some passages that are somewhat critical of Marxist political philosophy. You would shorly be sent a notification from the government that you had had 100 points (or whatever) deducted from your Social Credit Score.



The problem is that one you being to lose TOO MANY point of Social Credit, then you find...

* Your SCS is too low to be allowed to use commercial aircraft for travelling within China

* Your son or daughter has their application for a place in a one of your town's better quality schools automatically rejected.

* Your applications for promotion at work are routinely turned down.

* The amount of gas you are allowed to purchase for your car each week is cut by 20%.

* You need more living space for your growing family, but you are told that you do not have suffienct SCS points at present to qualify for a larger home from the Department of
Public Housing.


And so on.


The opposite applies if you behave in a manner the CCP finds praiseworthy/laudable. If you regularly visit your elderly parents; if you quite smoking (the Chinese have a serious problem with tobacco abuse in their cities - most Chinese males smoke like f**king chimneys) if you do regular charity/volunteer work on weekends for the poor or homeless in your community; if you post a at birthday card each year to Chairman Xi at CCP HQ in Beijing; if you make lots of comments to your friends on "What's App" saying how cool and enlightened the Chinese Communist Party really is, or if, say, you publish a BLOG on the internet that teaches how Chairman Mao was a very misunderstood Chinese Leader who was, in fact, a genius, though he is still branded a tyrrant by the West whose scholars have never understood Mao's truly sublime brilliance.



If you behave like this - in a manner/s approved by the Party -then your Social Credit Score will have points added to it; and the more SCS points you build up, the more privileges and liberties you will be entitled to...For instance...


* You will find it easier to gain promotion at work.

* The number train journies that you and your family are permitted each year on the State Rail Service will be increased.

* You will be permitted to buy extra amounts of luxuries like: beef steak, fresh chicken and ice- cream.

* You may be invited to take a place on the Executive Committee of your local branch of the "Green Action For China" movement - (a national climate change initiative spear-headed by Beijing's Chief of the Ministry of Environment and Ecology, the Honourable Hoo Did Poo :)

* If you are a model citizen, with a high SCS, you may even be invited to Chairman Xi's Grand presidential palace in Beijing to attend a special gala dinner where you will have the opportunity to meet current high-profile members of The Central Polituro, comrades like: Han Zheng, Sun Chunlan and even rising stars like, Wun Hung Low :) in person !.




On a totally serious note... this Social Credit Score (SCS) system that is being developed is a reality in China today. It relies on mass surveillance systems like China's "Skynet" which incorporates: facial recognition, big data analysis and Artificial Intelligence. Of course, as surveillance technologies become more refined and advanced, they have the potential to become ever more intrusive. In the novel "1984", George Orwell introduced the concept of a "THOUGHTCRIME" which was the crime of thinking thoughts that the totalitarian state in the novel would regard as unacceptable. In China there is surveillance technology being developed which aims uses individuals': body language; reflexive speech and facial expressions, etc; as means to gain a closer into peoples' thoughts..



To me the use - or the intention to use - comprehensive, mass intrusive surveilance technology by China to control the behaviour of its people is INSANE, just in principle I mean, the totalitarian technocratic States that Aldous Huxley and Geroge Orwell wrote about in "Brave New World" and "1984" were science - fiction; now it's becoming real in a nation on 1.4 billion people !





I often wonder... WHY is it ALWAYS FUCKING MARXISM that is at the heart of these nightmares. It was Marxism in the former Soviet Union under Stalin, that was the inspiration for George Orwell's, "1984", and Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World", two of the greatest novels in the English language. And what is their message in a nut shell ? I think - to get right down to the _nitty-gritty" - it is that the left's obsession with egalitarianism and what today's Democrat progressives (who are essentially, 21st century Marxists) refer to as "equity"; the idea of promoting collectivist thinking, or implementing communalist policies as a blueprint for improving human societies, IS ABHORANT AND TOXIC TO ALL CIVILIZED HUMAN BEINGS What I mean by collectivism is the slogan that is promoted by the totalitarian state in Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World", namely: "EVERYONE BELONGS TO EVERYONE ELSE". In Huxley's "Brave New World" people no longer exist as individuals - there is ZERO individual freedom/liberty. In the "Brave New World", human life no longer has no real worth or dignity.; it has no genuine meaning or value or purpose.




How many times do adult human beings need to have explained to them, how and why Marxist/collectivist/equalitarian/Democrat "progressive political ideology is GUARANTEED LETHAL I don't know. I mean, look at China... during the reign of Mao Zedong, which was not all that long ago, there was wholesale slaughter (some of the most brutal and horrific shit you could ever imagine), torture, incareration of COUNTLESS MILLION Chinese citizens, whose only crime (if any) was not to toe the Communist Party line. There was also the mass, deliberate destruction of priceless, Chinese cultural/religious artifacts, beautiful sculptures, statues, literature and other artworks some of them thousands of years old. You would think the Chinese would learn, but no, they haven't. Today there is still a Marxist Party (the CCP) running China - they government is still murderous "Big Brother", the Chinese people have no genuine individual liberty, no real human rights, etc.




My view is that if China refuses to learn from the past; if its people are content to accept life in a Marxist state - THEN FUCK THEM. Let them live like that if they wish, but do not EVER permit the CCP to try force their POISONOUS political ideology on any of the world's civilized, free Western countries If China makes ANY aggressive movement toward the West, the President of the United States must be the kind of man who will say: "STOP !! DO NOT MOVE ONE MORE INCH IN OUR DIRECTION, OR WE WILL UNLEASH ALL HELL ON YOU - AND THAT'S A PROMISE.




That last thing I want to say is that there may well be reasons that the Chinese race are vulnerable to Marxism. Firstly, they DO , generally speaking, possess a collectivist mind-set. They are psychologically disposed to think in a collectivist terms when it comes to social life. That's a matter of empirical scientific fact, BTW, according to many reputable psychological research investigations. The way I interpret this is that our thoughts (cognitions) are generated by our brains, and the structure and function of all of the different regions of our brains is predominantly genetically determined. So if you are born Chinese, you will be born with a brain that is genetically programmed to give you a collectivist world-view (especially if you are raised in Chinese society until the age of 27 or so, which is when the prefrontal-cortex - the thinking/cognitive region of your brain- is fully matured).



As for those American Congressional Democrats who are members of their Party's current "Progressive Caucus", there is no excuse. They have NO EXCUSE to be embracing Marxist ideology in the United States and actively pushing for the implementation of communist policies like:(1) CRT and revisionist fake history such as the "1619 Project", not to mention bullshit like pro LGBTQI material and transgenderism in American public schools; (2) Mass industrial-scale abortion, that sickens any moral person who contemplates it for more than 2 seconds, plus INFANTICIDE (which is a form of murder AND NOT a form of "Reproductive Health") I mean what kind of human being pushes for legislation like this ?(3) pressing for the expenditure of TRILLIONS of dollars on "Green New Deal" social programs, which will amount to nothing more than pissing good money up against the wall and inflating the economy even more, causing grief to every sane American family in the US. I mean, do you really think that normal American adults who work and pay taxes, trust a fuckwit like AOC, when she tells them that spending trillions of dollars on her (insane) GND is a super-duper idea ?? (4) An "Open Border" policy. This is simply bat-shit crazy; and that's all I need to say on the issue I think (5) Giving individuals who entered the US as illegal immigrants a reward of $450,000 ???? I could go on and on. The point is that this is all MARXIST EVIL. It is, tragically, what the Congressional Democratic Party have now become; and if that's the case, THEY NEED TO BE OUSTED, ASAP



In conclusion...




I think that there needs to be legislation passed asap,BANNING THE THE EXISTENCE OF ANY MARXIST/SOCIALIST POLITICAL PARTY OR ORGANIZATION IN THE US, no matter what it calls itself (for ex, BLM Inc. should be a banned organization, likewise the CPUSA, I would even go as far as to argue that the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) are now essentially more a Marxist political organization, than they are a bone fide Teacher's Union. INDIVIDUALS would be free to hold MARXIST/COMMUNIST/SOCIALIST/COLLECTIVIST political beliefs in accordance with the First Amendment, BUT they would NOT have the right to ASSOCIATE. They would be prohibited from forming any kind of political Party/organization/pressure group/community group/association, etc.




What do you think ?



Dachshund



DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !
 
Last edited:
I was reading the "Social Credit Score" (SCS) system they are rolling out in China. If you are not familiar with it, basically, all if China's 1.4 billion citizen will have a SCS assigned by the governtment (the Chinese Communist Party).

Everyone starts with, say, 1000 points, of Social Credit. If your behaviour is good, you will have points added to your SCS; if it is not good, you will have points deducted.


What behaviours are good or approved of, and what behaviours are not approved of or bad, are determined by the state (the Chinese Communist Party).


Now, here's the scarey bit. The system work; by high-tech surveillance; individuals are physically monited in public through face-recognition spyware; all of the data an individual receives or creates and sends on the internet through iPhones, lap-tops, social media platforms (Twitter, What's App, etc) is monitored. 5G networks/technology are expanding the range and levels of intrusivity of government surveillance of individuals/families in China.


This is a real-world example of the terrifying totalitarian tecnocracy depicted novels like "Brave New World" (1932) and "Nineteen Eighty Four" (1949). These novels were written as dystopian science fiction, but the Social Credit Score (SCS) system that has already been implemented in China,- and is now becoming more sophisticated and comprehensive with every day- is not fiction.



To give you an example... suppose you are a Chinese citizen and you make a comment to a friend on your IPhone that is critical of President XI (suppose you call him "Pooh Bear" which was one of his nick-names in China until he took offense and banned it!) or suppose you you write an article or essay for an on-line mazagine that contains some passages that are somewhat critical of Marxist political philosophy. You would shorly be sent a notification from the government that you had had 100 points (or whatever) deducted from your Social Credit Score.



The problem is that one you being to lose TOO MANY point of Social Credit, then you find...

* Your SCS is too low to be allowed to use commercial aircraft for travelling within China

* Your son or daughter has their application for a place in a one of your town's better quality schools automatically rejected.

* Your applications for promotion at work are routinely turned down.

* The amount of gas you are allowed to purchase for your car each week is cut by 20%.

* You need more living space for your growing family, but you are told that you do not have suffienct SCS points at present to qualify for a larger home from the Department of
Public Housing.


And so on.


The opposite applies if you behave in a manner the CCP finds praiseworthy. If you regularly visit your elderly parents; if you quite smoking (the Chinese have a serious problem with tobacco abuse - most of them smoke like f**king chimneys) if you do regular charity/volunteer work on weekends for the poor and indigent in your district; if you post a at birthday card each year to Chairman Xi at CCP HQ in Beijing; if you make lots of comments to your friends on "What's App" saying how cool and enlightened the Chinese Communist Party really is, or publish a BLOG on the Web explaining how Chairman Mao was a very misunderstood man who was, in fact, a genius, though he is still branded a tyrrant by the West for what were merely a handful triffling errors.



Then your Social Credit Score will have points added to it; and the more SCS points you build up, the more privileges and liberties you will be entitled to...For example...


* You will find it easier to gain promotion at work.

* The number train journies that you and your family are permitted each year on the State Rail Service will be increased.

* You will be permitted to buy extra amounts of luxuries like: beef steak, fresh chicken and ice- cream.

* You may be invited to take a place on the Executive Committee of your local branch "Green Action For China" movement - (a national climate change initiative spear-headed by
Beijing's Chief of the Ministry of Environment and Ecology, the Honourable Hoo Did Poo

* If you are a model citizen, with a high SCS, you may even be invited to Chairman Xi's Grand presidential palace in Beijing to attend a special gala dinner where you will have the
opportunity to meet current high-profile members of The Central Polituro, comrades like: Han Zheng, Sun Chunlan and even rising stars like, Wun Hung Low (1) in person !.




On a totally serious note, this Social Credit Score (SCS) system that is being developed is a reality in China today. It relies on mass surveillance systems like China's "Skynet" which incorporates: facial recognition, big data analysis and Artificial Intelligence. Of course, as surveillance technologies become more refined and advanced, they have the potential to become ever more intrusive. In the novel "1984", George Orwell introduced the concept of a "THOUGHTCRIME" which was the crime of thinking thoughts that the totalitarian state in the novel would regard as unacceptable. In China there is surveillance technology being developed which aims uses individuals': body language; reflexive speech and facial expressions, etc; as means to gain a closer into peoples' thoughts..



To me the use - or the intention to use - comprehensive, mass intrusive surveilance technology by China to control the behaviour of its people is INSANE, just in principle I mean, the totalitarian technocratic States that Aldous Huxley and Geroge Orwell wrote about in "Brave New World" and "1984" were science - fiction; now it's becoming real in a nation on 1.4 billion people !



Why is it ALWAYS FUCKING MARXISM that is at the heart of these nightmares. It was Marxism in the former Soviet Union under Stalin, that was the insiration for George Orwell's, "1984". and Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World", two of the greatest novels in the English language. What is their message in a nut shell ? I think it is that the left's obsession with egalitarianism and what today's Democrat progressives (who are essentially, 21st century Marxists) refer to as "equity"; the idea of promoting collectivist thinking, or implementing communalist policies as a blueprint for improving human societies, IS ABHORANT AND TOXIC TO ALL CIVILIZED HUMAN BEINGS What I mean by collectivism is the slogan that is promoted by the totalitarian state in Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World", namely: "EVERYONE BELONGS TO EVERYONE ELSE". In Huxley's "Brave New World" people no longer exist as individuals - there is ZERO individual freedom/liberty. In the "Brave New World", human life no longer has no real worth or dignity.; it has no genuine meaning or value or purpose.



How many times do adult human beings need to have explained to them, how and why Marxist/collectivist/equalitarian/Democrat "progressive political ideology is GUARANTEED LETHAL I don't know. I mean, look at China... during the reign of Mao Zedong, which was not all that long ago, there was wholesale slaughter (some of the most brutal and horrific shit you could ever imagine), torture, incareration of COUNTLESS MILLION Chinese citizens, whose only crime (if any) was not to toe the Communist Party line. There was also the mass, deliberate destruction of priceless, Chinese cultural/religious artifacts, beautiful sculptures, statues, literature and other artworks some of them thousands of years old. You would think the Chinese would learn, but no, they haven't. Today there is still a Marxist Party (the CCP) running China - they government is still murderous "Big Brother", the Chinese people have no genuine individual liberty, no real human rights, etc.



My view is that if China refuses to learn from the past; if its people are content to accept life in a Marxist state - THEN FUCK THEM. Let them live like that if they wish, but do not EVER permit the CCP to try force their POISONOUS political ideology on any of the world's civilized, free Western countries If China makes ANY aggressive movement toward the West, the President of the United States must be the kind of man who will say: "STOP !! DO NOT MOVE ONE MORE INCH IN OUR DIRECTION, OR WE WILL UNLEASH ALL HELL ON YOU - AND THAT'S A PROMISE



That last thing I want to say is that there may well be reasons that the Chinese race are vulnerable to Marxism. Firstly, they DO , generally speaking, possess a collectivist mind-set. They are psychologically disposed to think in a collectivist terms when it comes to social life. That's a matter of empirical scientific fact, BTW, according to many reputable psychological research investigations. The way I interpret this is that our thoughts (cognitions) are generated by our brains, and the structure and function of all of the different regions of our brains is predominantly genetically determined. So if you are born Chinese, you will be born with a brain that is genetically programmed to give you a collectivist world-view (especially if you are raised in Chinese society until the age of 27 or so, which is when the prefrontal-cortex - the thinking/cognitive region of your brain- is fully matured).



As for those American Congressional Democrats who are members of their Party's current "Progressive Caucus", there is no excuse. They have NO EXCUSE to be embracing Marxist ideology in the United States and actively pushing for the implementation of communist policies like:(1) CRT and revisionist fake history such as the "1619 Project", not to mention bullshit like pro LGBTQI material and transgenderism in American public schools; (2) Mass industrial-scale abortion, that sickens any moral person who contemplates it for more than 2 seconds, plus INFANTICIDE (which is a form of murder AND NOT a form of "Reproductive Health") I mean what kind of human being pushes for legislation like this ?(3) pressing for the expenditure of TRILLIONS of dollars on "Green New Deal" social programs, which will amount to nothing more than pissing good money up against the wall and inflating the economy even more, causing grief to every sane American family in the US. I mean, do you really think that normal American adults who work and pay taxes, trust a fuckwit like AOC, when she tells them that spending trillions of dollars on her (insane) GND is a super-duper idea ?? (4) An "Open Border" policy. This is simply bat-shit crazy; and that's all I need to say on the issue I think (5) Giving individuals who entered the US illegal immigrants a reward of $450,000 ???? I could go on and on. The point is that this is all Marxist madness. It is what the Congressional Democratic Party have become.




I think that there needs to be legislation passed asap,BANNING THE THE EXISTENCE OF ANY MARXIST/SOCIALT POLITICAL PARTY OR ORGANIZATION IN THE US, no matter what it calls itself (for ex BLM Inc. shoulds be a banned organization, likewise the CPUSA, I would even go as far as arguing that the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) as essentially more a Marxist political organization, than they are a bone fide Teacher's Union. INDIVIDUALS would be free to hold MARXIST/COMMUNIST/SOCIALIST/COLLECTIVIST political beliefs in accordance with the First Amendment, BUT they would NOT have the right to ASSOCIATE. They would be prohibited from forming any kind of political Party/organization/pressure group/community group, etc.




What do you think ?



Dachshund



DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !


I think that I would really appreciate it if you would work on distillation.

I have had a wild day and am too far gone for this much work....I will try to remember to get back to it tommorrow.

Feel free to ping me if I fail to do so.

I do think that you are often right I will say that.
 
e have been here before in the short history of the United States, and we will survive this time too. During the Founding of this country we had to face down the Tories. They were the "conservatives" of that time and desired to remain under the control of the Corporate entities, and the government, of that time. Then we had the "conservatives" of the South, and their desire to keep slavery alive just ass they feel the need to do so now with their "Right to Work" ideology, and "slave wages". The n came WW2, and again the "conservatives" of the day supported Hitler, Nazism, Nativism (America First, and "The Big Lie" of Hitler) under the leadership of the likes of Charles Lindbergh. And throughout this period was the self imposed belief in racism even as "conservatives" today wish to impose it on the American people. IMO, that is just pone of the reasons that so-called "conservatives" today oppose the teaching of CRT.

It is my hope that we will survive this latest distraction, and threat, from the right wing of the country. There is no doubt that they would love to see the image of Hitler rise as the "king" of the United States. They share the same ideology of hatred, fear, and paranoia, that the German people shared at that time. And as the rest of the world seeks to rid themselves of the control by the Elites (Authoritarians) they seek to bend the knee to their masters ignoring the warnings of God, and the Founders.

Or do we deserve their "king"?

"Jesus is not a Republican. This has been said before. But now it must be said more loudly and more clearly than ever. There are good and godly men and women who vote Republican and serve in elected office as Republicans. But the association of the name of Christ with the Republican party of Trump has become a scourge of shame for the church. The time has come––indeed, it is long overdue––for the entire church to denounce this association in the strongest possible terms.

Jesus was not a violent revolutionary. It is not uncommon for Christians, particularly progressive Christians, to describe Jesus as a revolutionary. Of course, in a sense, this is absolutely true. During Jesus’ first life on earth, he challenged many social norms having to do with Torah observance, women’s roles in society, and association with the marginalized. However, Jesus was not a violent revolutionary. The “zealots” of Jesus’ day were revolutionaries who aspired to violent rebellion against Rome in God’s name. Jews had successfully (though temporarily) thrown off the rule of their imperial overlords in the Maccabean Revolt less than two centuries earlier. The Jews would rebel again in the century following Jesus’ death and resurrection, this time unsuccessfully and with devastating results for the nation.

But Jesus was not a zealot. When asked whether God’s people should pay taxes to the empire, Jesus answered “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s. Give to God what is God’s.” (Mark 12:17) When Jesus was arrested, Peter rose violently to his Rabbi’s defense. Jesus rebuked him, saying “Put your sword back in its place, for all who choose the sword will be destroyed by the sword. Don’t you realize I can call on my Father, and he will at once put more than twelve legions of angels at my disposal?” (Matt 26:52–53, my translation) He later tells the Jewish authorities, “My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would be fighting to prevent my arrest.” (John 18:36, my translation)

What this means for Christians today is that the way of violence is not the way of Christ. Much has been said in recent days about the hypocrisy of “the left” or “the media” denouncing the violence in the Capitol while endorsing the violence of the BLM movement last year. Frankly, I don’t care that much whether “the left” or “the right” are hypocrites. What I do care about is that the violence at the Capitol was perpetrated in Jesus’ name. Look no further than the Christian symbols that permeated the rioters’ ranks, including a massive yellow sign reading “Jesus Saves” on the steps of the Capitol, crosses in the crowd, or t-shirts reading “Jesus is my Savior and Trump is my President.” As far as I can tell no glaring effort was made by BLM demonstrators to associate their movement with Jesus or the mission of God in America. That, without question, makes the violence of the movement at the Capitol the more grievous sin, akin to the wicked acts of the professing Christians who perpetrated the Crusades in the Holy Land. Jesus’ Kingdom comes, not through violence, but through love."

https://www.pastortheologians.com/a...epublican-and-christianity-is-not-nationalism

They're Not Conservatives, They're Extremists - Institute for Policy Studies

https://ips-dc.org/theyre-not-conservatives-theyre-extremists/

The Political Legacy of American Slavery | The Journal of Politics: Vol 78, No 3

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/686631

How do Trump’s Republicans compare to the rest of the world’s political parties?

https://www.newstatesman.com/world/...blicans-compare-rest-worlds-political-parties

America First, for Charles Lindbergh and Donald Trump

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/america-first-for-charles-lindbergh-and-donald-trump

christianity is associated with the right because the nazi left embraces scientific materialism and never ending power grab as their religion, aka communism.
 
christianity is associated with the right because the nazi left embraces scientific materialism and never ending power grab as their religion, aka communism.


When you say "power", that means "political power". Right? And basically, having "political power" - as far as the left is concerned - means being able to make people do what they do not, or would not, otherwise do, AND getting a kick out of it because you enjoy subjugating other human beings. I mean "subjugating" in the sense of REDUCING them and stripping away their dignity, in the way a medieval feudal Baron would lay down the law to the serfs living on his land. But using political power like this is immoral.


I think this explains why so many of America's Congressional/Deep State Democrats are such lying, corrupt, venomous ass-holes. For example: Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden; Kamala Harris; Nancy Pelosi; Chuck Schumer; Diane Feinstein; Kristen Gillibrand; Keith Ellison; Cory Booker; Adam Schiff; Gerry Nadler; Stacey Abrams; Barack Obama; Jim Comey; Robert Mueller; John Brennan, Jim Clapper, Susan Rice; Merick Garland; Jen Psaki; Eric Holder; Gavin Newsome; Eric Swallwell; Ilhan Omar and the list goes on and on and on. These people are nasty vile, evil human beings. They are not fools, but they have absolutely NO MORAL CONSCIENCE They have no interest at all in anything but using ANY means available to maximizing their personal political power in order to avenge themselves for perceived injustices (Kamala Harris, Barack Obama get payback for Whitey's racism), or to enrich themselves and their families (Pelosi, Feinstein)


The best current example of an American politican who (now) has political power, but is not a crooked or vicious ass-hole is Glenn Youngkin. I think he is a rare example of someone who has run for political office for the RIGHT reasons. As Governor of Virginia , I think he will use the political power that he now has in a wise way, at least I think he will try to. You might laugh, but I alway thought the same thing about Trump, I think he really tried hard to DO THE RIGHT THING for America; and he had a lot of success. I could never understand the left in America attacking him so relentlessly over trivial shit like sending too many firey Tweets, or using "colourful" language now and then, or not speaking in "Queens English". I mean WHO CARES about trivial BS like the fact he fucked "Stormy Daniels" in 2006, that he or grabbed a little pussy in the past ? OTOH, if he screwed up the US economy big time or deliberately (and illegally) opened up the Southern Border so that every poxy bandito and Cartel drug-traffiker, and criminal sex- pervert in the world who wanted to stroll into America unhindered could do so, THEN you might have a reason to get upset.




Dachshund



(DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !
 
When you say "power", that means "political power". Right? And basically, having "political power" - as far as the left is concerned - means being able to make people do what they do not, or would not, otherwise do, AND getting a kick out of it because you enjoy subjugating other human beings. I mean "subjugating" in the sense of REDUCING them and stripping away their dignity, in the way a medieval feudal Baron would lay down the law to the serfs living on his land. But using political power like this is immoral.


I think this explains why so many of America's Congressional/Deep State Democrats are such lying, corrupt, venomous ass-holes. For example: Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden; Kamala Harris; Nancy Pelosi; Chuck Schumer; Diane Feinstein; Kristen Gillibrand; Keith Ellison; Cory Booker; Adam Schiff; Gerry Nadler; Stacey Abrams; Barack Obama; Jim Comey; Robert Mueller; John Brennan, Jim Clapper, Susan Rice; Merick Garland; Jen Psaki; Eric Holder; Gavin Newsome; Eric Swallwell; Ilhan Omar and the list goes on and on and on. These people are nasty vile, evil human beings. They are not fools, but they have absolutely NO MORAL CONSCIENCE They have no interest at all in anything but using ANY means available to maximizing their personal political power in order to avenge themselves for perceived injustices (Kamala Harris, Barack Obama get payback for Whitey's racism), or to enrich themselves and their families (Pelosi, Feinstein)


The best current example of an American politican who (now) has political power, but is not a crooked or vicious ass-hole is Glenn Youngkin. I think he is a rare example of someone who has run for political office for the RIGHT reasons. As Governor of Virginia , I think he will use the political power that he now has in a wise way, at least I think he will try to. You might laugh, but I alway thought the same thing about Trump, I think he really tried hard to DO THE RIGHT THING for America; and he had a lot of success. I could never understand the left in America attacking him so relentlessly over trivial shit like sending too many firey Tweets, or using "colourful" language now and then, or not speaking in "Queens English". I mean WHO CARES about trivial BS like the fact he fucked "Stormy Daniels" in 2006, that he or grabbed a little pussy in the past ? OTOH, if he screwed up the US economy big time or deliberately (and illegally) opened up the Southern Border so that every poxy bandito and Cartel drug-traffiker, and criminal sex- pervert in the world who wanted to stroll into America unhindered could do so, THEN you might have a reason to get upset.




Dachshund



(DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !

yes. amazing post.

trump dared to say bad things against internationalist fascism, aka globalist zealotry.

that's why lincoln project rinos hate him too.
 
When you say "power", that means "political power". Right? And basically, having "political power" - as far as the left is concerned - means being able to make people do what they do not, or would not, otherwise do, AND getting a kick out of it because you enjoy subjugating other human beings. I mean "subjugating" in the sense of REDUCING them and stripping away their dignity, in the way a medieval feudal Baron would lay down the law to the serfs living on his land. But using political power like this is immoral.


I think this explains why so many of America's Congressional/Deep State Democrats are such lying, corrupt, venomous ass-holes. For example: Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden; Kamala Harris; Nancy Pelosi; Chuck Schumer; Diane Feinstein; Kristen Gillibrand; Keith Ellison; Cory Booker; Adam Schiff; Gerry Nadler; Stacey Abrams; Barack Obama; Jim Comey; Robert Mueller; John Brennan, Jim Clapper, Susan Rice; Merick Garland; Jen Psaki; Eric Holder; Gavin Newsome; Eric Swallwell; Ilhan Omar and the list goes on and on and on. These people are nasty vile, evil human beings. They are not fools, but they have absolutely NO MORAL CONSCIENCE They have no interest at all in anything but using ANY means available to maximizing their personal political power in order to avenge themselves for perceived injustices (Kamala Harris, Barack Obama get payback for Whitey's racism), or to enrich themselves and their families (Pelosi, Feinstein)


The best current example of an American politican who (now) has political power, but is not a crooked or vicious ass-hole is Glenn Youngkin. I think he is a rare example of someone who has run for political office for the RIGHT reasons. As Governor of Virginia , I think he will use the political power that he now has in a wise way, at least I think he will try to. You might laugh, but I alway thought the same thing about Trump, I think he really tried hard to DO THE RIGHT THING for America; and he had a lot of success. I could never understand the left in America attacking him so relentlessly over trivial shit like sending too many firey Tweets, or using "colourful" language now and then, or not speaking in "Queens English". I mean WHO CARES about trivial BS like the fact he fucked "Stormy Daniels" in 2006, that he or grabbed a little pussy in the past ? OTOH, if he screwed up the US economy big time or deliberately (and illegally) opened up the Southern Border so that every poxy bandito and Cartel drug-traffiker, and criminal sex- pervert in the world who wanted to stroll into America unhindered could do so, THEN you might have a reason to get upset.




Dachshund



(DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !

What a line of shit you post here as usual. You seem to feel s if your gawds are the "saints" of the world, and have never lied. In doing so you again lose touch with reality, and ignore the truth. But hey, it is your "reality" even though it is based on the lies told by your masters.
 
No,....libtards will not survive what is coming. You are the past. Like an old rotten fart,....you made your presence known,.... stunk up the joint,....and were gone as fast as you first came. Nice knowing you,... the future will treat you as if you were never here at all because you never REALLY stood for anything....

They hang around due to the mushy middle who fall prey to feel good agendas when they are fat dumb and happy. Its a shame that they don't realize that its because of conservatives that they ARE fat dumb and happy and its the fault of liberals when they are not.
 
They hang around due to the mushy middle who fall prey to feel good agendas when they are fat dumb and happy. Its a shame that they don't realize that its because of conservatives that they ARE fat dumb and happy and its the fault of liberals when they are not.

Exactly. " Hard men create soft times, soft times create soft men, soft men create hard times,...hard times create hard men....
 
All of the flag-carrying hypocrites on January 6th will reap what they have sewn.

Some have already been sentenced and begun to serve time for their offenses.

Many more will follow.
 
I was reading the "Social Credit Score" (SCS) system they are rolling out in China. If you are not familiar with it, basically, all of China's 1.4 billion citizen will have a SCS assigned by the governtment (the Chinese Communist Party).


Everyone starts with, say, 1000 points, of Social Credit. If your behaviour is good, you will have points added to your SCS; if it is not good, you will have points deducted.



What behaviours are good or approved of, and what behaviours are not approved of or bad, are determined by the state (the Chinese Communist Party).
--------------------------
snip

As a socialist I have some sympathy for wanting to promote those who help pull the society and to penalize those who are drags, but the Chinese social credit system is an abomination and is likely to work out poorly for the Chinese over the long haul because power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. But we must be mindful that the Chinese are very likely to be soon the single global superpower, and that the West is imitating China all over the place, to include the social credit system. Those in America who conform to the alleged consensus get rewarded, dissents get crushed. And we see in America which is now deeply corrupt and nonfunctional how power corrupts, how important consent is, how important it is that the consensus be challenged. Ideas must be allowed to compete freely and fairly or else we all suffer, which we dont have anymore in America, and America is circling the drain because of this.

The last thing I will say is that at the moment the CHinese are OK because there is consensus that at this time the most important thing is that The New Chinese Empire fulfil its destiny to have the greatest flowering ever, this time it will be global. They are aboard the very hard work required to do this and the restrictions on individual freedoms that are required to get there. The Chinese will never thirst for individual freedoms like the West used to champion, but what they are doing under the social credit system is a bit much even for them. So long as the party leadership does not go too far and so long as leadership leads to global domination and the rest of the world adopting to the ways of the Chinese they are OK with this, but this contract gets reevaluated every day. So far the party is performing, so far the people are willing to go along. Tomorrow who knows.

Thank You for your patience.
 
Last edited:
They hang around due to the mushy middle who fall prey to feel good agendas when they are fat dumb and happy. Its a shame that they don't realize that its because of conservatives that they ARE fat dumb and happy and its the fault of liberals when they are not.

Please expound upon the idea that conservatism has ever benefited the country. And try to be specific.

"Members, when asked about their nativist organizations, were supposed to reply that they knew nothing, hence the name. As its membership and importance grew in the 1850s, the group slowly shed its clandestine character and took the official name American Party. As a national political entity, it called for restrictions on immigration, the exclusion of the foreign-born from voting or holding public office in the United States, and for a 21-year residency requirement for citizenship.

By 1852 the Know-Nothing party was achieving phenomenal growth. It did very well that year in state and local elections, and with passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 it won additional adherents from the ranks of conservatives who could support neither the proslavery Democrats nor antislavery Republicans. When Congress assembled on December 3, 1855, 43 representatives were avowed members of the Know-Nothing party.
Know-Nothing party"

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Know-Nothing-party
 
Last edited:
Back
Top