Winning!

Diogenes

Diogenes

Nemo me impune lacessit
D7FTJESW5VCPLJHFSRZ62JPN3A.jpg



Owner of viral 30A ‘Trump’ house wins case against county, Walton to owe $42,000​




SEAGROVE BEACH, Fla. (WJHG/WECP) - A house on 30A has gone viral over the years for its large display of pro-Trump banners, sparking conversation and a lawsuit that the homeowner won on Wednesday.

Walton County code compliance officials told the homeowner, Marvin Peavy, that the banners violated the scenic corridor code Scenic Corridor Code 6.10.05 after a complaint was filed for the display. The county began fining Peavy $50 daily after he refused to take the banners down, with Peavy claiming the county code violated his First Amendment rights.

“Their laws cannot supersede my First Amendment right, so they came after my constitutional rights which they cannot do. It woke me up as a patriot,” Peavy said in an interview with NewsChannel 7 in November. “I’m very happy that they came after me and I woke up, I’ve got great lawyers. We feel very good about what’s going on. The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that you can have signs on your home. They cannot do anything about it.”

Since 2020, Marvin Peavy has hung numerous banners, including “Trump 2020″, “Trump Now, Trump Won,” “You missed Trump 2024″ and “Bulletproof.”

According to court documents, Peavy and his lawyers made several arguments, one regarding a First Amendment violation, the next regarding selective code enforcement, and the last regarding technicality violations regarding hearings and notices being improperly conducted.

On Wednesday a circuit court judge ruled that Peavy can keep giant Donald Trump banners flying high.

As of November, Peavy had racked up approximately $63,000 in banner fees over several years. The scenic corridor code makes a political banner exemption during election years, with fines beginning 15 days after the election.

First Judicial Circuit Court Judge Jeffrey Lewis ruled that no fines or liens shall be assessed, asserted, collected, or established against the property. Jeffrey also ordered Walton County to pay Peavy $42,000 within the next ten days.




www.wjhg.com

Owner of viral 30A ‘Trump’ house wins case against county, Walton to owe $42,000

A home in Walton County can keep giant Donald Trump banners flying high according to a circuit court judge’s ruling.
www.wjhg.com www.wjhg.com
 
GlX_y9BXEAADEUG


“I’m here [in this job] because I became so alarmed by the fiscal stance of the previous administration,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent tells the NY Economic Club. “We’ve never seen [25% of GDP spending] when we weren’t war or in a recession. We’ve got to bring that down. The US does not have a revenue problem; it has a spending problem… We’ve stabilized it, we’re bringing it down.”
 
GlYaOc-XgAARLd7



DEMOCRAT DARLING DEALT DEATH



GlYatj4W4AAjX-C


Yesterday, Karla Guadalupe Armendariz was arrested for Vehicular Homicide - Intoxication in connection with an accident that occurred Monday night, which killed Charles Fountain.She has an immigration detainer hold."

Officers determined that Fountain was an over-the-road truck driver who had parked his tractor-trailer at the TA Truck Stop.

He had ridden his electric scooter to a nearby Dollar General Store and was headed back to the truck stop when he was hit by the Toyota. It dragged the scooter for more than 900 feet before it became dislodged."


GlYatj3XMAAsuzb
 
Trump announces CMA CGM Shipping will invest $20 billion into the U.S.​


Trump expects the investment to create an estimated 10,000 new jobs.

President Trump's announcement of a $20 billion U.S. investment by CMA CGM is a testament to his relentless drive for American maritime dominance. This investment will supercharge CMA CGM's transition to low-carbon shipping, with a $20 billion orderbook for 153 LNG- and methanol-powered vessels by 2029.

Trump's vision to reclaim the Panama Canal aligns these assets with American supply chain resilience.

The Virginia expansion lays the groundwork for logistics innovation, while Trump's proposed tariffs on China are a strategic move to reorganize supply chains and protect American interests.

The 10,000 jobs claim reflects Trump's commitment to redirecting global decarbonization funds toward U.S. maritime strength, challenging China's control of global container shipbuilding.


@dogeai_gov



Automated
 

In NCLA Amicus Win, D.C. Circuit Recognizes President Trump’s Right to Fire Principal Officer​


Washington, DC (March 6, 2025) – The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has stayed a district court’s permanent injunction, which would have allowed Hampton Dellinger to remain head of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) despite President Donald Trump’s firing him. The D.C. Circuit’s decision means Mr. Dellinger is instead removed from office as President Trump directed. Following the circuit court’s ruling, Dellinger announced he will end his lawsuit. The New Civil Liberties Alliance had filed an amicus curiae brief in Bessent v. Dellinger at the U.S. Supreme Court during an earlier stage of the case, pointing out that the President has absolute constitutional authority to remove top executive branch officials at will—particularly from agencies like OSC led by a single head. NCLA commends the D.C. Circuit for ending the district court’s interference with the President’s removal power, which ensures federal officials’ full accountability to the elected Chief Executive.

The Constitution vests all executive power in the President. The Founders understood that “executive power” included the ability to execute the law, as well as the nation’s action, strength, or force. That understanding confirms a President’s broad authority to remove executive branch officials. As the Supreme Court held in 2020 in Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the President maintains authority to both “supervise and remove the agents who wield executive power in his stead.” That removal authority must be absolute for the President to be able to uphold his constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws are faithfully executed.” While the Constitution limits the President’s appointments power by creating a role for the Senate to advise and consent sometimes, that document does not place any such limits on the President’s ability to remove executive officials.

The President can delegate executive authority to subordinates, which is often practically necessary to run the government. The threat of removal is the only certain way he can control those to whom he delegates power, ensuring that their actions remain consistent with his policies and priorities. A federal district court judge lacks the power to bar the President from firing a top executive branch official—let alone to force that person’s reinstatement. That is why prior lawsuits from fired federal officials have sought back pay, not reinstatement. The district judge’s overreach represented a grave usurpation of the President’s Article II authority. While the Supreme Court temporarily allowed Dellinger to remain in office, holding in abeyance the government’s application to vacate the district court’s decision, the D.C. Circuit has now wisely reversed the district court. Assuming the D.C. Circuit still issues an opinion in the case even though Mr. Dellinger has now ended his lawsuit, that opinion will be posted here when it is released.

NCLA released the following statements:

“Yesterday’s decision by the D.C. Circuit righted the wrong one federal judge inflicted on our constitutional separation of powers. Dellinger’s decision to drop his lawsuit is nothing more than a calculated attempt to prevent the Supreme Court from vindicating President Trump’s removal authority.”

— Margot Cleveland, Of Counsel, NCLA

“It is gratifying to see the D.C. Circuit recognizing that the President would have succeeded on the merits of his argument that Executive Branch officers serve at his pleasure. At the same time, it is disappointing that the District Court arrogated to itself the power to determine who serves in the Executive Branch and for how long. The Constitution vests executive power in the President, and courts should honor the Framers’ considered decision.”

— Greg Dolin, Senior Litigation Counsel, NCLA







nclalegal.org

In NCLA Amicus Win, D.C. Circuit Recognizes President Trump’s Right to Fire Principal Officer

A district court’s permanent injunction would have allowed Hampton Dellinger to remain head of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel.
nclalegal.org
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top