Wisconsin Just called for Walker...
- Thread starter Damocles
- Start date
Here's the huffpo link to the live results...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/05/wisconsin-recall-election-results-2012_n_1571730.html
They have also called it for Walker.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/05/wisconsin-recall-election-results-2012_n_1571730.html
They have also called it for Walker.
Are you entirely incapable of understanding my answers in the 119% thread?
Follow this thread: http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?41214-Madison-has-119-turnout-What
Read it, your answer is there as well as a question you failed to answer.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
So now that Walker has been declared the winner, there's no longer any reason to suspect voter fraud?
Please go to this thread and read my answers to your questions there rather than repeating them here, you can also participate by answering the questions propounded to you. This is what is called a "conversation"...
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?41214-Madison-has-119-turnout-What
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
So what was fishy earlier isn't any more?
That question was answered in this thread:
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?41214-Madison-has-119-turnout-What
I think you can find it, I gave you a link. There are also questions you have failed to answer... What's the problem? You have RCDD?
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Earlier you said something was fishy in Wisconsin.
Still think so?
Still think so?
There was this part in this thread here:
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?41214-Madison-has-119-turnout-What
Where you asked much the same questions and they were answered, I then asked some questions of you. Can you answer them?
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
So you won't say whether or not there was anything fishy in Wisconsin now, but earlier you thought there was.
What changed?
Rationalist
Hail Voltaire
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012/wisconsin-recall-results
With 80% of precincts reporting, Walker is leading Barrett 55.3% - 44.7%.
Poor liberals.
With 80% of precincts reporting, Walker is leading Barrett 55.3% - 44.7%.
Poor liberals.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Nope. Not fishy.
It would still look fishy if that is what the result is... Seriously? 119% turnout wouldn't seem fishy to you?
If you go to the thread, I answered the question of whether I would believe it was still fishy if Walker won Wisconsin. I'm sure you can find it, it is a short thread.
I'll give you a hint. It's in this thread.
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?41214-Madison-has-119-turnout-What
I quoted you asking the question. I answered it, then I asked you some questions that you have failed to answer. Are you afraid or is it RCDD?
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
So it still looks fishy?