Wisconsin Just called for Walker...

Damocles said:
It would still look fishy if that is what the result is... Seriously? 119% turnout wouldn't seem fishy to you?
Click to expand...

I guess it's not anymore, right?

You'd have more credibility if you cried about the ridiculous voter irregularities in 2000 & '04. But your guy won then, too, so....
 
Onceler said:
I guess it's not anymore, right?

You'd have more credibility if you cried about the ridiculous voter irregularities in 2000 & '04. But your guy won then, too, so....
Click to expand...

You'd have more credibility if you could remember what I actually said back then.

Do you think a 119% of voter turnout would seem fishy even if the overall election turned out the way you wanted?
 
Damocles said:
It would still look fishy if that is what the result is... Seriously? 119% turnout wouldn't seem fishy to you?
Click to expand...

The way I read it was they allowed first time voters to register today at the polls. So a bunch of people who have never voted before supposedly showed up today and voted.
 
Onceler said:
I guess it's not anymore, right? You'd have more credibility if you cried about the ridiculous voter irregularities in 2000 & '04. But your guy won then, too, so....
Click to expand...

Ironically, the answer to the 119% thing - that was fishy and then wasn't - is in the thread the dancin' Dalai started...
 
cawacko said:
The way I read it was they allowed first time voters to register today at the polls. So a bunch of people who have never voted before supposedly showed up today and voted.
Click to expand...

Enough in a major population center to make it 119%?

Anyway, I read it was just a projection based on pace. An early projection. However, if they indeed report that many... Yeah, I'd say it seemed fishy, even with same day registration. It would seem even more fishy had Walker won in Madison...
 
Damocles said:
Enough in a major population center to make it 119%? Anyway, I read it was just a projection based on pace. An early projection. However, if they indeed report that many... Yeah, I'd say it seemed fishy, even with same day registration. It would seem even more fishy had Walker won in Madison...
Click to expand...

But it's not fishy now?
 
Like I said earlier today, the union slugs couldn't cheat enough to steal this one. It is a blowout. Hell, I bet the real results are more like 57 - 43, when you subtract deceased votes and other voting fraud.
 
\\()// said:
But it's not fishy now?
Click to expand...

There's this thread... Where I answered your questions. I'm pretty sure you can find it, but I will link to it again. There you can find answers to your questions as well as questions that I have asked you that you have failed to answer. Please visit it, answer the questions...

At that point we can have a conversation.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?41214-Madison-has-119-turnout-What

Why are you afraid to answer questions? Or is it RCDD?
 
Baalim said:
Like I said earlier today, the union slugs couldn't cheat enough to steal this one. It is a blowout. Hell, I bet the real results are more like 57 - 43, when you subtract deceased votes and other voting fraud.
Click to expand...

So the election was fishy because Walker didn't get enough votes?
 
Just for Legion Fag, the winners can still launch an investigation in Madison, and just stick it to the liberals. Does that sound good?
 
Damocles said:
There's this thread... Where I answered your questions. I'm pretty sure you can find it, but I will link to it again. There you can find answers to your questions as well as questions that I have asked you that you have failed to answer. Please visit it, answer the questions...

At that point we can have a conversation.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?41214-Madison-has-119-turnout-What

Why are you afraid to answer questions? Or is it RCDD?
Click to expand...

Are you trying to win Moderater of the Year; beause I can't see any other reason for you to continue trying to educate legion?
 
Don Quixote said:
the anti-walker forces were outspent over 7 to 1, the vast bulk of which came from out of state, must be nice to be able to buy candidates
Click to expand...

except we've already proven that was a lie......so sorry, Don.......

for more verification, here's a new source just in case you don't believe the Huffington Post.....

Despite Gov. Scott Walker’s huge fundraising advantage heading into next month’s recall election, a Wisconsin State Journal analysis of the money that has flowed into all state campaigns and political groups since Walker took office suggests backers of the two major political parties have competed on an unusually level playing field.

Altogether, at least $77.1 million surged into Wisconsin campaigns and political groups between Jan. 1, 2011 — two days before Walker took office — and April 23 of this year, according to campaign finance statements filed with the state Government Accountability Board.

Read more: http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/lo...1dd-11e1-bea4-0019bb2963f4.html#ixzz1x0nVpRWP
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
The Dude said:
Kinda big deal, hes the first ever governor to survive a recall vote.
Click to expand...

I think the last recall of a Governor was from my liberal state of California when they recalled Gov. Gray Davis (D) and replaced him with Schwarzenegger (R).

images
 
RazorX said:
I think the last recall of a Governor was from my liberal state of California when they recalled Gov. Gray Davis (D) and replaced him with Schwarzenegger (R).

images
Click to expand...

The family values Republican? That Schwarzenegger?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top