AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
There is no evidence that the mayor "coddles" rapists as that retard @Truth Detector claimed.
Woke Boston Mayor Michelle Wu coddles rapists as ‘part of the family’
- Thread starter Truth Detector
- Start date
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Where's the evidence?Yes, you are.
I think you can get dumber.
Yakuda
Verified User
Really? The article notes the policies in Boston say the police can only cooperate with ICE on charges of sex and drug trafficking. Stop being an idiot
There is. It is obvious when the mayor insists on protecting violent criminal aliens from ICE.
Unfortunately for you, you are mentally retarded and would find it extremely difficult to comprehend the obvious.
Evidence that you can get even dumber?Where's the evidence?
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
"...rape is obviously horrible." - Wu
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
There is no evidence in the article, dumbass.Go back and read the article halfwit.
Yakuda
Verified User
But she won't do.anythkg to deport anyone who engaged in it.
"...Unless you rape a white conservative biological female....then it is OK..." Wu.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
I looked at the article. Yep an opinion hit piece. 
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Uh what?
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
It's an opinion piece.
Yakuda
Verified User
Its been pointed out to you
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
There is no definitive evidence to support the claim that Boston Mayor Michelle Wu "coddles rapists." This accusation appears to stem from recent criticism of her administration’s immigration policies, particularly regarding Boston’s status as a "sanctuary city." Critics, including some posts on X and articles from outlets like the New York Post, have suggested that Wu’s refusal to fully cooperate with federal immigration enforcement, such as turning over undocumented immigrants wanted by ICE, amounts to protecting criminals, including rapists. However, these claims are largely speculative and lack specific, verifiable examples tied directly to Wu’s actions or policies.
Wu has consistently defended Boston’s approach, arguing that limiting local police cooperation with ICE enhances public safety by encouraging immigrants to report crimes without fear of deportation. During her March 5, 2025, testimony before Congress, she emphasized Boston’s low violent crime rates and rejected narratives that immigrants broadly pose a danger. She did not explicitly address hypothetical scenarios about specific criminals like rapists, instead focusing on broader policy impacts. Critics, including some Republican lawmakers and local voices like Jon Fetherston (a former migrant shelter director), argue her policies prioritize political ideology over safety, but no concrete data or cases have been widely cited to show her administration deliberately shields rapists.
The phrase "coddles rapists as ‘part of the family’" seems to originate from a New York Post headline, which itself is an inflammatory interpretation rather than a direct quote or documented policy from Wu. Without specific evidence—like court records, ICE reports, or statements from Wu showing leniency toward rapists—the claim remains an unproven assertion driven by political rhetoric rather than fact. Sentiment on X reflects this divide, with some users amplifying the accusation, but such posts alone don’t constitute proof.
In short, while Wu’s immigration stance has sparked controversy, the idea that she "coddles rapists" is not substantiated by clear, factual evidence as of now. It’s a charged critique tied to broader debates about sanctuary cities, not a proven description of her actions.
@Grok
Wu has consistently defended Boston’s approach, arguing that limiting local police cooperation with ICE enhances public safety by encouraging immigrants to report crimes without fear of deportation. During her March 5, 2025, testimony before Congress, she emphasized Boston’s low violent crime rates and rejected narratives that immigrants broadly pose a danger. She did not explicitly address hypothetical scenarios about specific criminals like rapists, instead focusing on broader policy impacts. Critics, including some Republican lawmakers and local voices like Jon Fetherston (a former migrant shelter director), argue her policies prioritize political ideology over safety, but no concrete data or cases have been widely cited to show her administration deliberately shields rapists.
The phrase "coddles rapists as ‘part of the family’" seems to originate from a New York Post headline, which itself is an inflammatory interpretation rather than a direct quote or documented policy from Wu. Without specific evidence—like court records, ICE reports, or statements from Wu showing leniency toward rapists—the claim remains an unproven assertion driven by political rhetoric rather than fact. Sentiment on X reflects this divide, with some users amplifying the accusation, but such posts alone don’t constitute proof.
In short, while Wu’s immigration stance has sparked controversy, the idea that she "coddles rapists" is not substantiated by clear, factual evidence as of now. It’s a charged critique tied to broader debates about sanctuary cities, not a proven description of her actions.
@Grok
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
It is an opinion hit piece. Look at my post #38.
Yakuda
Verified User
Meaningless. No citation.. The article however notes Boston sanctuary policies allow police to assist ICE only with sex and drug trafficking charges. Look a pig with ashes on its forehead is still a pig.