Women needs help

bravo said:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...ppies_into_river_sparks_anger_death_thre.html

If it was live human babies at least the ACLU and DNC would probably come to her defense...
Click to expand...

She's a real sicko. And I hope you were just as outraged about the soldier who threw a puppy off a cliff. Your gratuitous slams at the ACLU and DNC really have nothing to do with the issue.


"In this video a soldier – apparently a marine – takes a puppy and throws it to its death. Does anyone know if the video is authentic? Radar has identified a specific marine as the culprit."

And before you respond that it was probably a hoax...

..."the Marine Corps announced they had punished the two Marines involved with the video (and were discharging Lance Cpl. Motari), but they were not specific about either of the men's roles in creating the video or the punishment they received:
Lance Cpl. David Motari, assigned to the 1st Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment at Kaneohe Bay, is "being processed for separation" from the Marine Corps, the Marine Corps said in a news release. He also received unspecified "non-judicial punishment."

The Marine Corps didn't say what role Motari played in the clip.

"The actions seen in the Internet video are contrary to the high standards we expect of every Marine and will not be tolerated," Marine Corps Base Hawaii said in a news release. "The vast majority of Marines conduct their duties with honor and compassion that makes American people proud."

The second Marine, Sgt. Crismarvin Banez Encarnacion, also received unspecified "non-judicial" punishment.

Encarnacion is assigned to the Weapons and Field Training Battalion, Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego.

First Lt. Binford Strickland, a Marine Corps Base Hawaii spokesman, said the service may not reveal what roles the two men played in the video because that was part of the investigation. He said releasing such information would violate the Privacy Act.

Strickland declined to provide details about the disciplinary measures taken against the men for the same reason."

http://www.snopes.com/photos/military/throwpuppy.asp
 
Damn Yankee said:
Killing canine babies = bad; killing human babies = good.
Click to expand...

Nice of you to invent an argument. But can you show me where I have advocated killing human babies?

Let me know, otherwise you are just spouting nonsense again.
 
My gratuitous slams ??????? Welllllll.....???

Maybe that was a little harsh about the ACLU.....

But we have pinheads that defend the religion that condones cutting off the fuckin' noses and ears of women; the religion that condones stoning people for literally nothing, the religion that preaches killing non-believers as a noble cause to their children and in their mosques......those folks might defend just about anything....
 
If you are willing to show us an abortion doctor throwing live babies into the river, I would be happy to stomp him as well.

But since the medical procedures you are talking about are private, there is no way for us to know which are medically necessary, medically advisable, and which are purely for the convenience of the mother.

This girls actions were simply cruelty. A future sociopath.
 
christiefan915 said:
She's a real sicko. And I hope you were just as outraged about the soldier who threw a puppy off a cliff. Your gratuitous slams at the ACLU and DNC really have nothing to do with the issue.


"In this video a soldier – apparently a marine – takes a puppy and throws it to its death. Does anyone know if the video is authentic? Radar has identified a specific marine as the culprit."

And before you respond that it was probably a hoax...

..."the Marine Corps announced they had punished the two Marines involved with the video (and were discharging Lance Cpl. Motari), but they were not specific about either of the men's roles in creating the video or the punishment they received:
Lance Cpl. David Motari, assigned to the 1st Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment at Kaneohe Bay, is "being processed for separation" from the Marine Corps, the Marine Corps said in a news release. He also received unspecified "non-judicial punishment."

The Marine Corps didn't say what role Motari played in the clip.

"The actions seen in the Internet video are contrary to the high standards we expect of every Marine and will not be tolerated," Marine Corps Base Hawaii said in a news release. "The vast majority of Marines conduct their duties with honor and compassion that makes American people proud."

The second Marine, Sgt. Crismarvin Banez Encarnacion, also received unspecified "non-judicial" punishment.

Encarnacion is assigned to the Weapons and Field Training Battalion, Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego.

First Lt. Binford Strickland, a Marine Corps Base Hawaii spokesman, said the service may not reveal what roles the two men played in the video because that was part of the investigation. He said releasing such information would violate the Privacy Act.

Strickland declined to provide details about the disciplinary measures taken against the men for the same reason."

http://www.snopes.com/photos/military/throwpuppy.asp
Click to expand...


Point of order, the puppy in said video was dead beforehand. Still disgraceful, but not as bad as if it were alive.
 
WinterBorn said:
If you are willing to show us an abortion doctor throwing live babies into the river, I would be happy to stomp him as well.

But since the medical procedures you are talking about are private, there is no way for us to know which are medically necessary, medically advisable, and which are purely for the convenience of the mother.

This girls actions were simply cruelty. A future sociopath.
Click to expand...
What a cowardly cop-out.....

Try this on for reality......

Abortion is practically never necessary to save a mother's life. Its not 1492 or ......its 2010 and the C-section procedure has been around since the days of Rome
 
bravo said:
What a cowardly cop-out.....

Try this on for reality......

Abortion is practically never necessary to save a mother's life. Its not 1492 or ......its 2010 and the C-section procedure has been around since the days of Rome
Click to expand...

this is a total bullshit comparison and you know it. you want to stomp the woman deciding to abort her child, fine. but the doctor doing it? no, not even close.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
this is a total bullshit comparison and you know it. you want to stomp the woman deciding to abort her child, fine. but the doctor doing it? no, not even close.
Click to expand...
So we'll only prosecute the man that hires his friend to kill his wife and not the friend that does the actual killing....I get it, peckerhead

Of course that doesn't addrress my point...''
Abortion is practically never necessary to save a mother's life.
 
bravo said:
So we'll only prosecute the man that hires his friend to kill his wife and not the friend that does the actual killing....I get it, peckerhead

Of course that doesn't addrress my point...''
Abortion is practically never necessary to save a mother's life.
Click to expand...

what the hell are you babbling about?

two things you need to remind yourself before spouting total crap is that 'abortion' is a constitutionally protected right. As abusive of the constitution that that act is, as I see it, it doesn't make the person performing the abortion the perpetrator. That crime falls to the woman making the decision to not deal with the consequences of spreading her legs.

the second thing to remember is that you'll find it very hard in your lifetime to change that judicial act of constitutional subversion, so it does absolutely zero good to insult someone that is IN YOUR CAMP on abortion.
 
bravo said:
What a cowardly cop-out.....

Try this on for reality......

Abortion is practically never necessary to save a mother's life. Its not 1492 or ......its 2010 and the C-section procedure has been around since the days of Rome
Click to expand...

That you for your unqualified medical opinion, Dr Bravo.

"Dr. Papa deals specifically with high-risk pregnancies. Patients are referred to her by their OB-GYN's because of conditions that threaten the life or health of the mother or the baby. Dr. Papa discussed the case of one thirty-year-old woman, both of whose parents had a history of heart attacks. This woman, herself, had a heart attack in which her cardiac tissue was damaged. She desperately wanted to have her baby, but after careful examination and many diagnostic tests, Dr. Papa determined that she could not carry the child to viability without a high probability of her own death. Suddenly this poor woman and her husband were plummeted into a world where, instead of choosing baby names and nursery furniture, they were making a date to be admitted to the hospital for a medically necessary abortion.

Another woman was found to have severely enlarged arteries near the heart, a condition of which she was unaware before she became pregnant. She, too, underwent a medically necessary abortion even though she, too, really wanted to have her baby.

In another case, it was determined that the baby lacked a cranium-- it did not have a brain. The woman had a choice of carrying the child to term, knowing that it would die shortly after birth, or having an abortion."

From:
http://www.swimmingkangaroo.com/blog/2006/03/what-do-doctors-mean-by-medically.html

What say we listen to the medical doctor that specializes in high risk pregnancies, mkay?

I didn't say they were the majority, or that it was even common.
 
Stupid Superstition said:
Point of order, the puppy in said video was dead beforehand. Still disgraceful, but not as bad as if it were alive.
Click to expand...

No, the puppies arenot dead.

[ame="http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bb4_1283184704"]LiveLeak.com - Twisted Girl Throws Puppies in River **This video contains scenes of repeated animal cruelty**[/ame]

Watch the puppy she picks up at the 0:09 mark. And the last two are also alive. I can't say anything about the others, because I didn't see movement.

But some, at least, were alive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top