Women needs help

this is a total bullshit comparison and you know it. you want to stomp the woman deciding to abort her child, fine. but the doctor doing it? no, not even close.

What is bullshit is this guy posts an article about a girl throwing live puppies into a river, and he tries to make it all seem fine since some people support abortion.

And neocons try to claim that libs lack logic?

Hey bravo, abortion is fine, because the the Holocaust killed millions of jews solely because of their religion.
 
What is bullshit is this guy posts an article about a girl throwing live puppies into a river, and he tries to make it all seem fine since some people support abortion.

And neocons try to claim that libs lack logic?

Hey bravo, abortion is fine, because the the Holocaust killed millions of jews solely because of their religion.
Well sonny....I NEVER said it was not 'fine', or it was good or it was bad....
What I did claim is that in 2010, abortion to save the mothers life is almost never necessary....
Get that ? Not
'never necessary'....but "almost never necessary".....
The instance of aborting a deformed fetus is much more common a reason than saving the life of the mother....
and if you add up the number of abortions performed for those two reasons, it is but a small percentage of total abortions performed every year....

Its legal and settled law....
and now we.re getting far beyond the facetious remark I made in the opening post...
 
Last edited:
no, because the doctor isn't the one making the decision to abort the child. total non-sequitor and apples and cucumbers comparison.
I'll re-phrase. Do you feel the same way about women who choose abortions simply because they "are not ready to have a child", or similar issue unrelated to her health or how she got pregnant?
 
I'll re-phrase. Do you feel the same way about women who choose abortions simply because they "are not ready to have a child", or similar issue unrelated to her health or how she got pregnant?

Let me phrase it another way. WTF difference does someone's personal view on abortion make? This bitch was throwing live puppies into a river. Expressing outrage at that is normal.

If you want to start a debate about abortion, knock yourself out. But this attempt to make it seem connected to abortion is just bullshit.
 
Millions of abortions like that are performed every year. Why aren't you outside of clinics 'stomping the crap out of' these women?

You who are supposed to be some constitutional scholar, should know that currently there is no constitutional right to throw live puppies in a river, but there IS a constitutional right to have an abortion. Therefore, I can legitimately get away with stomping the shit out of a bitch throwing puppies in the river by telling a jury I was stopping felony animal cruelty, but would have that defense thrown back in my face if I did that to some dumb bitch who just didn't want to be pregnant.
 
You who are supposed to be some constitutional scholar, should know that currently there is no constitutional right to throw live puppies in a river, but there IS a constitutional right to have an abortion. Therefore, I can legitimately get away with stomping the shit out of a bitch throwing puppies in the river by telling a jury I was stopping felony animal cruelty, but would have that defense thrown back in my face if I did that to some dumb bitch who just didn't want to be pregnant.

Animal cruelty isn't part of the Constitution, but [human] life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness is guaranteed. Although I understand your anger at the puppy killer, she has every right to do what she did, at least on the federal level. And of course the abortion issue is hotly debated.

Yet you don't express a higher level of outrage at women who abort their children.

Maybe you agree with me that since liberal women are mainly the ones aborting their own children, and had they not done so would undoubtedly raise them to be liberals, abortion is good for the country.
 
Let me phrase it another way. WTF difference does someone's personal view on abortion make? This bitch was throwing live puppies into a river. Expressing outrage at that is normal.

If you want to start a debate about abortion, knock yourself out. But this attempt to make it seem connected to abortion is just bullshit.

I've never seen liberals express outrage over the other activity. Pleasure and glee, most definitely, but certainly no outrage.
 
Update:

UPDATE: Police Closing In On Girl Who Threw Puppies In River

Here Is What Authorities Have Learned

An animal rights group in Bosnia called "Flekice" (Spots) has contacted authorities saying the video was filmed at the Vrbas River which is located in the central Bosnian town of Bugojno.

The Associated Press reported that Velimir Ivanisevic from the Association of Citizens for Prevention of Cruelty Against Animals (SOS), said his group received an e-mail that allegedly identifies the young woman as a 19-year-old teenager who lives in Bugojno. Her brother filmed the video.

"We cannot say with 100 percent certainty that this is true…but we received some other information which leads us to believe that it is," Ivanisevic said.

"It is a mirror of society and the fact that young people are doing such things shows how they have been raised," he continued.

On Wednesday Flekice and SOS both contacted Bosnian police. An investigation has begun, but authorities refuse to discuss the details.

Bosnia recently adopted an animal protection law that punishes people who kill or torture animals with fines that range from $12 dollars to $6,400 dollars.

Some people speculate the video is a hoax and the producers are trying to cash in on the notoriety Mary Bale attracted last week when she dumped a helpless cat into a garbage bin. Bale had to go under police protection because of threats on her life.

It's hard to imagine that two teenagers think this sort of attention is enviable, but for the sake of the newborn puppies I sincerely hope it is really what happened.

Late Breaking News

Late in the day on Wednesday a video of apology appeared on YouTube, supposedly from the girl with the puppies. It was quickly removed by You Tube for violations to their policy, but cnet news was able to grab one frame that gave the following information.

The girl gave her name and apologized for her behavior. She explained the puppies were only 3 days old and belonged to her grandmother. The puppies were sick and her grandmother asked her to get rid of them. She decided to throw them in the river because "it was a short death, I did not want to make them suffer," the frame states.

At this point no one knows if this second video is authentic or if someone is trying to inflame the feelings of people who care about animals. But like the Mary Bale case, it shows the Internet is a very powerful tool.

http://www.care2.com/causes/animal-...losing-in-on-girl-who-threw-puppies-in-river/
 
for the cruel chick trying to apologize.

STFU.gif
 
Back
Top