ExpressLane
Verified User
What a bunch of sore losers.I’d take any club in the American League East except Toronto, along with the Mets, Phillies, Pirates and of course the Cubs
What a bunch of sore losers.I’d take any club in the American League East except Toronto, along with the Mets, Phillies, Pirates and of course the Cubs
I would offend myself making a remark like that.
"Redskins" was indeed beyond the pale, but most indigenous Americans weren't offended by the word "Indians" as a traditional baseball team name.
Notre Dame, a schools with a French name, isn't offended by "Fighting Irish."
The Cleveland franchise is was of the last four American League charter members,
along with the Red Sox, the White Sox, and the Tigers---not even the Yankees.
Of course, neither the American nor Nation League
even exists anymore
except as a trademarks of Major League Baseball.
People of every ethnicity, of course, have their snowflakes for whom righteous indignation is a full time job.
A group of native Americans are suing the Washington team Former known as the Redskins to change the name back to the Redskins. One of the people on your side of politics constantly refers to people as Whitey. :laugh Perhaps you should speak to him.
What a bunch of sore losers.
History? It's what have you done lately that counts. I thought it was interesting that they won all 11 of their away post season games. Just very odd.“Losers?” Compare their histories against any other franchises and I would call them “losers”
And I don’t begrudge Texas for winning, I like watching baseball, watched the Series, they were a good club especially down the stretch
Are you sure about that? It honestly does not make any difference to me. I like calling people what they call themselves generally. But I personally think this is a tempest in a teapot. I just love beating the Washington team whatever their name is. I always thought being a mascot was a sign of respect. Like my old High School football team was the Chiefs and we respected the mascot.But someone was offended so they changed it to the Mustangs. I'm not sure who it offended?“A group,” and many more felt offended by the nickname
For example, a 2019 web-based survey of 500 self-identified Native Americans that was reported in The Washington Post found that 68% of those polled were not offended by the Washington Redskins’ name. ".
And never would, can’t stand those that over frequent cliches and useless generalizations, their useless
Correct.
One more indication that baseball is being flushed down the toilet.
Perhaps by the time they get rid of the Braves, the job will be complete.
Get Bent.
That's a classic!
Who are you?
Top's sock
I found it very racist that Top would deliberately misuse the Name of the Cleveland Baseball team! She has a long history of attack women of color!
Uhh…she wasn’t the first to do that on this thread. I’ll have to own that. Sorry if it offends anyone…well, sort of.
As sock those names offend me. Too phonetically close.I would offend myself making a remark like that.
"Redskins" was indeed beyond the pale, but most indigenous Americans weren't offended by the word "Indians" as a traditional baseball team name.
Notre Dame, a schools with a French name, isn't offended by "Fighting Irish."
The Cleveland franchise is was of the last four American League charter members,
along with the Red Sox, the White Sox, and the Tigers---not even the Yankees.
Of course, neither the American nor Nation League
even exists anymore
except as a trademarks of Major League Baseball.
People of every ethnicity, of course, have their snowflakes for whom righteous indignation is a full time job.