Worst Case Climate Scenario Isn't Global Warming

Libhater

Libhater

Verified User
This century's WORST-CASE climate scenario isn't global warming of 4 or even 5 degrees Celsius. It's a nuclear winter that would trigger global cooling up to 12 or 13 degrees Celsius.

That would happen within weeks of the start of a nuclear war, as smoke from burning cities blotted out the sun. The result would be massive famine as the ocean's food chain collapsed and global crops failed.

In most scenarios, hunger would spread around much of the globe and kill hundreds of millions of people.

Even a small nuclear war say, between India and Pakistan--would cause enough global cooling to starve hundreds of millions of people.

In a war that involved Russia and the U.S., which have more powerful weapons and larger stock piles, the death toll would likely exceed half the world's population.

Mind you, I still take the hyper fear mongering of the Leftist global warming fanatics very seriously with their concern of our seas rising, forest fires, our temperature rising some 1 degree Fahrenheit in 20 years or so, and their New Green deal group-think that unless we exterminate fossil fuels, that we only have some 9 or 10 years of life on this planet.
 
Libhater said:
This century's WORST-CASE climate scenario isn't global warming of 4 or even 5 degrees Celsius. It's a nuclear winter that would trigger global cooling up to 12 or 13 degrees Celsius.

That would happen within weeks of the start of a nuclear war, as smoke from burning cities blotted out the sun. The result would be massive famine as the ocean's food chain collapsed and global crops failed.

In most scenarios, hunger would spread around much of the globe and kill hundreds of millions of people.

Even a small nuclear war say, between India and Pakistan--would cause enough global cooling to starve hundreds of millions of people.

In a war that involved Russia and the U.S., which have more powerful weapons and larger stock piles, the death toll would likely exceed half the world's population.

Mind you, I still take the hyper fear mongering of the Leftist global warming fanatics very seriously with their concern of our seas rising, forest fires, our temperature rising some 1 degree Fahrenheit in 20 years or so, and their New Green deal group-think that unless we exterminate fossil fuels, that we only have some 9 or 10 years of life on this planet.
Click to expand...

Well first of all the left doesn't give a shit about global warming or cooling or the earth flying off it's axis. They care about centralized control of power. They want to do away with democratic self governance and want a huge strong centralized govt structure. What problem has arisen in the past 20 years that the left thought couldn't be solved by the govt?
 
Yakuda said:
Well first of all the left doesn't give a shit about global warming or cooling or the earth flying off it's axis. They care about centralized control of power. They want to do away with democratic self governance and want a huge strong centralized govt structure. What problem has arisen in the past 20 years that the left thought couldn't be solved by the govt?
Click to expand...

Great points, and we all know that the Left only gives a shit about having centralized control of power for their elites. Screw the common man, and or screw the peasant is their narrative.
 
Dear fucking idiots


The Republican Party doesn’t get the majority of votes even when they win elections through the electoral route anymore


You can’t claim the consent of the people for anything


The courts have decades of court documented facts that prove the Republican Party cheats in elections


You were punished for it by the courts for decades before you packed the SCOTUS to end that punishment via Roberts


Fuck you very much
 
1982 lawsuit and consent decree
Edit
A civil lawsuit was filed after the election by the DNC, which alleged that the RNC had violated the Voting Rights Act[10] and engaged in illegal harassment and voter intimidation.[11] The suit was settled in 1982, when the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee, instead of a trial, signed a consent decree in U.S. District Court saying that they would not allow tactics that could intimidate Democratic voters, though they did not admit any wrongdoing.[10][12][13] The case and ensuing decree were supervised by District Court Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise for the ensuing 34 years.[14]

The consent decree, entered on November 1, 1982,[13] prevented the Republican Party "from engaging in activities that suppress the vote, particularly when it comes to minority voters."[15] It also barred the wearing of armbands at polling places.[15] Under the consent decree "the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed 'ballot security' programs, including any proposed voter caging."[13] The consent decree was set to expire in December 2017.[16] A successor consent decree, applying to several states, was entered on July 27, 1987.[13]
 
evince said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballot_Security_Task_Force#1982_lawsuit_and_consent_decree



Here’s a start
Click to expand...



Prior to the expiration of the decree in 2018, the Republican Party attempted several times, without success, to have it terminated. They argued that it was "antiquated" and unnecessary.[10] The Democratic National Committee countered by arguing that "recent campaigns show the 'consent degree remains necessary today.'"[10] In 2009, a New Jersey federal judge rejected the RNC's request to vacate the consent decree. This ruling was unanimously affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 2012.[13][17] The Supreme Court declined to hear the RNC's appeal in 2013.[10]
 
The 2020 presidential election was the first presidential election since 1980 in which the Republican Party was able to deploy "ballot security operations". In 2019 Justin R. Clark, an official in Trump's re-election campaign, was recorded telling Republican lawyers that the expiration of the consent decree was a "huge, huge, huge, huge deal" for the campaign's election day operations in Wisconsin.[21] In March 2020 the RNC announced plans to mobilize 50,000 poll watchers to swing states, while Trump described plans to mobilise law enforcement as poll watchers, and the True the Vote group sought to recruit police officers and military veterans. The political scientist Kenneth Mayer of the University of Wisconsin–Madison argued in August 2020 that the lifting of the consent decree raised the prospect of a return to practices of voter intimidation, while Justin Levitt of Loyola Law School argued that the RNC was unlikely to have the capacity to mobilize such numbers.[22][23] In October 2020 the Trump campaign said it had enlisted more than 50,000 volunteer poll watchers in swing states.[24] In a September 2020 opinion column, Florio likened Trump's rhetoric to the use of voter intimidation in the 1981 campaign.[25]
 
I can go on with links of facts that prove the Republican Party cheats in elections for hours if you wish
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_New_Hampshire_Senate_election_phone_jamming_scandal



The 2002 New Hampshire Senate election phone jamming scandal involved the use of a telemarketing firm hired by that state's Republican Party (NHGOP) for election tampering. The tampering involved using a call center to jam the phone lines of a get out the vote (GOTV) operation. In the end, 900 calls were made for 45 minutes of disruption to the Democratic-leaning call centers.

During that state's 2002 election for the United States Senate seat being vacated by Republican Bob Smith, the NHGOP hired GOP Marketplace, based in northern Virginia, to jam another phone bank being used by the state Democratic Party and the firefighters' union for efforts to turn out voters on behalf of then-Governor of New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen on Election Day. John E. Sununu, the Republican nominee, won a narrow victory. In addition to criminal prosecutions, disclosures in the case have come from a civil suit filed by the state's Democratic Party against the state's Republican Party (now settled).

Four men were convicted of, or pleaded guilty to, federal crimes and sentenced to prison for their involvement. One conviction was reversed by an appeals court. James Tobin, freed on appeal, was later indicted on charges of lying to the FBI during the original investigation.
 
Libhater said:
This century's WORST-CASE climate scenario isn't global warming of 4 or even 5 degrees Celsius. It's a nuclear winter that would trigger global cooling up to 12 or 13 degrees Celsius.

That would happen within weeks of the start of a nuclear war, as smoke from burning cities blotted out the sun. The result would be massive famine as the ocean's food chain collapsed and global crops failed.

In most scenarios, hunger would spread around much of the globe and kill hundreds of millions of people.

Even a small nuclear war say, between India and Pakistan--would cause enough global cooling to starve hundreds of millions of people.

In a war that involved Russia and the U.S., which have more powerful weapons and larger stock piles, the death toll would likely exceed half the world's population.

Mind you, I still take the hyper fear mongering of the Leftist global warming fanatics very seriously with their concern of our seas rising, forest fires, our temperature rising some 1 degree Fahrenheit in 20 years or so, and their New Green deal group-think that unless we exterminate fossil fuels, that we only have some 9 or 10 years of life on this planet.
Click to expand...

The Church of Global Warming has said we only have 9 or 10 years of life on this planet for some 50 years now.
 
evince said:
Why do you idiots hate science

And math

And history
Click to expand...
Ask yourself. You are the one that hates science, math, or history.
evince said:
And democracy?
Click to expand...
There currently is no democracy in the world.

I hate democracy because there is no constitution to protect minorities or to limit government.
I hate democracy because it is an unstable form of government that quickly dissolves into an oligarchy or dictatorship (Athens became a dictatorship).
I hate democracy because it is unmanageable on a large scale.

I support a republic. It has a constitution. I support the United States as it was organized as a federated republic.

You don't want a democracy either. You want an oligarchy and you want to call it a 'democracy'.
 
evince said:
Dear fucking idiots
The Republican Party doesn’t get the majority of votes even when they win elections through the electoral route anymore
Click to expand...
How would you know?? There was no election in 2020.
evince said:
You can’t claim the consent of the people for anything
Click to expand...
Yes we can.
evince said:
The courts have decades of court documented facts that prove the Republican Party cheats in elections

You were punished for it by the courts for decades before you packed the SCOTUS to end that punishment via Roberts
Click to expand...
You are describing Democrats. It is DEMOCRATS the committed election fraud and caused the 2020 election to fault, and AGAIN in 2022 and caused several elections to fault.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top