Worst Case Climate Scenario Isn't Global Warming

evince said:
1982 lawsuit and consent decree
Edit
A civil lawsuit was filed after the election by the DNC, which alleged that the RNC had violated the Voting Rights Act[10] and engaged in illegal harassment and voter intimidation.[11] The suit was settled in 1982, when the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee, instead of a trial, signed a consent decree in U.S. District Court saying that they would not allow tactics that could intimidate Democratic voters, though they did not admit any wrongdoing.[10][12][13] The case and ensuing decree were supervised by District Court Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise for the ensuing 34 years.[14]

The consent decree, entered on November 1, 1982,[13] prevented the Republican Party "from engaging in activities that suppress the vote, particularly when it comes to minority voters."[15] It also barred the wearing of armbands at polling places.[15] Under the consent decree "the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed 'ballot security' programs, including any proposed voter caging."[13] The consent decree was set to expire in December 2017.[16] A successor consent decree, applying to several states, was entered on July 27, 1987.[13]
Click to expand...

No, you cannot make the election fraud by Democrats disappear by pointing to Republicans.
 
evince said:
The 2020 presidential election was the first presidential election since 1980 in which the Republican Party was able to deploy "ballot security operations". In 2019 Justin R. Clark, an official in Trump's re-election campaign, was recorded telling Republican lawyers that the expiration of the consent decree was a "huge, huge, huge, huge deal" for the campaign's election day operations in Wisconsin.[21] In March 2020 the RNC announced plans to mobilize 50,000 poll watchers to swing states, while Trump described plans to mobilise law enforcement as poll watchers, and the True the Vote group sought to recruit police officers and military veterans. The political scientist Kenneth Mayer of the University of Wisconsin–Madison argued in August 2020 that the lifting of the consent decree raised the prospect of a return to practices of voter intimidation, while Justin Levitt of Loyola Law School argued that the RNC was unlikely to have the capacity to mobilize such numbers.[22][23] In October 2020 the Trump campaign said it had enlisted more than 50,000 volunteer poll watchers in swing states.[24] In a September 2020 opinion column, Florio likened Trump's rhetoric to the use of voter intimidation in the 1981 campaign.[25]
Click to expand...

There was no election in 2020. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.
 
Libhater said:
This century's WORST-CASE climate scenario isn't global warming of 4 or even 5 degrees Celsius. It's a nuclear winter that would trigger global cooling up to 12 or 13 degrees Celsius.

That would happen within weeks of the start of a nuclear war, as smoke from burning cities blotted out the sun. The result would be massive famine as the ocean's food chain collapsed and global crops failed.

In most scenarios, hunger would spread around much of the globe and kill hundreds of millions of people.

Even a small nuclear war say, between India and Pakistan--would cause enough global cooling to starve hundreds of millions of people.

In a war that involved Russia and the U.S., which have more powerful weapons and larger stock piles, the death toll would likely exceed half the world's population.

Mind you, I still take the hyper fear mongering of the Leftist global warming fanatics very seriously with their concern of our seas rising, forest fires, our temperature rising some 1 degree Fahrenheit in 20 years or so, and their New Green deal group-think that unless we exterminate fossil fuels, that we only have some 9 or 10 years of life on this planet.
Click to expand...

We are on the road to global famine even without a nuclear war.
 
Libhater said:
This century's WORST-CASE climate scenario isn't global warming of 4 or even 5 degrees Celsius. It's a nuclear winter that would trigger global cooling up to 12 or 13 degrees Celsius.

That would happen within weeks of the start of a nuclear war, as smoke from burning cities blotted out the sun. The result would be massive famine as the ocean's food chain collapsed and global crops failed.

In most scenarios, hunger would spread around much of the globe and kill hundreds of millions of people.

Even a small nuclear war say, between India and Pakistan--would cause enough global cooling to starve hundreds of millions of people.

In a war that involved Russia and the U.S., which have more powerful weapons and larger stock piles, the death toll would likely exceed half the world's population.

Mind you, I still take the hyper fear mongering of the Leftist global warming fanatics very seriously with their concern of our seas rising, forest fires, our temperature rising some 1 degree Fahrenheit in 20 years or so, and their New Green deal group-think that unless we exterminate fossil fuels, that we only have some 9 or 10 years of life on this planet.
Click to expand...

As studies, like the one done here:

9780394720425-uk-300.jpg


Show nuclear winter is grossly overrated. The war and nuclear exchange itself may kill tens of millions, but the aftermath isn't nearly as bad as you make out.

In fact, far worse would be the eruption of a super volcano like the Yellowstone caldera or equivalent. That would put far more material into the atmosphere and do so for a far longer time--decades versus months or maybe a year or two in a nuclear war.
 
Libhater said:
This century's WORST-CASE climate scenario isn't global warming of 4 or even 5 degrees Celsius. It's a nuclear winter that would trigger global cooling up to 12 or 13 degrees Celsius.

That would happen within weeks of the start of a nuclear war, as smoke from burning cities blotted out the sun. The result would be massive famine as the ocean's food chain collapsed and global crops failed.

In most scenarios, hunger would spread around much of the globe and kill hundreds of millions of people.

Even a small nuclear war say, between India and Pakistan--would cause enough global cooling to starve hundreds of millions of people.

In a war that involved Russia and the U.S., which have more powerful weapons and larger stock piles, the death toll would likely exceed half the world's population.

Mind you, I still take the hyper fear mongering of the Leftist global warming fanatics very seriously with their concern of our seas rising, forest fires, our temperature rising some 1 degree Fahrenheit in 20 years or so, and their New Green deal group-think that unless we exterminate fossil fuels, that we only have some 9 or 10 years of life on this planet.
Click to expand...

Those from the left have never said they want to exterminate fossil fuels so that makes every thing you just said garbage, if you believe that you are a fucking idiot. Have a nice day.:fu:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top