Would they support the devil himself if he had a (R)next to his name~satan(R)

domer76 said:
What does the diploma say, Dr. “Science”? lol

NOBODY I know degreed in the sciences claims they have a degree in “science”. Just more bullshit from you. And your lack of critical thinking skills as noted in #108 is continually validated with your ill-informed and ignorant posts.

Critical think “virgin birth”, pally. What does your degree in “science” tell you about that?
Click to expand...

Do you have a college degree?

:chuckle:
 
Right said:
Do you have a college degree?

:chuckle:
Click to expand...

I sure as shit do, dumbfuck. And the degree indicates the discipline. Your degree in “science” is bullshit and indicative of an AA. Does yours look like this, Dr. Science?

6a00d8341c4f9453ef01b8d087051d970c-pi
 
domer76 said:
“The Bible is the word of God"
"How can you be sure it's the word of God?"
"Because the Bible tells us so"
"Why believe the Bible?
"The Bible is infallible"
"How do you know it's infallible?"...

(Return to top)
Click to expand...

Is there a point in there somewhere, you asked about the ark I provided something!
 
Wolverine said:
Sure, so! You asked for something on the ark I provided it then you came back with some blah blah blah! got anything else. Would you like to ask something again or challenge something?
Click to expand...

Here’s the fallacy of circular reasoning, dumbfuck, which you ignorantly employed.

You can’t use a particular source (the Bible) to prove the validity of the source (the Bible). See how that works, moron?

Your “source” is also wrong when it claims 75,000 species. There are millions. The rest is also circular BS.

But, YOU tell me. How did those particular animals found only in Australia (only 2 of them), hike all the way from Turkey to Australia. Unharmed. No mating until they arrived.

I’ll leave the other absurdities of your children’s story until later.
 
domer76 said:
Here’s the fallacy of circular reasoning, dumbfuck, which you ignorantly employed.

You can’t use a particular source (the Bible) to prove the validity of the source (the Bible). See how that works, moron?

Your “source” is also wrong when it claims 75,000 species. There are millions. The rest is also circular BS.

But, YOU tell me. How did those particular animals found only in Australia (only 2 of them), hike all the way from Turkey to Australia. Unharmed. No mating until they arrived.

I’ll leave the other absurdities of your children’s story until later.
Click to expand...

Ask me a hard one will you?
Evolutionists acknowledge that men and animals could once freely cross the Bering Strait, which separates Asia and the Americas. Before the idea of continental drift became popular, evolutionists depended entirely upon a lowering of the sea level during an ice age (which locked up water in the ice) to create land bridges, enabling dry-land passage from Europe most of the way to Australasia, for example.

The existence of some deep-water stretches along the route to Australia is still consistent with this explanation. Evolutionist geologists themselves believe there have been major tectonic upheavals, accompanied by substantial rising and falling of sea floors, in the time period which they associate with an ice age. For instance, parts of California are believed to have been raised many thousands of feet from what was the sea floor during this ice age period, which they call “Pleistocene” (one of the most recent of the supposed geological periods). creationist geologists generally regard Pleistocene sediments as post-flood, the period in which these major migrations took place.

In the same way, other dry-land areas, including parts of these land bridges, subsided to become submerged at around the same time.

Now you, where did life begin and how?

If you must use foul language, here is a quote from Will Smith's grandma
Dear Willard, intelligent people do not use these words to express themselves."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top