They has health care systems like ours. Then ... they decided EVERYONE should have access, not just ones that could afford it.
Why should someone unwilling to pay get the same things those willing to pay get by paying?
They has health care systems like ours. Then ... they decided EVERYONE should have access, not just ones that could afford it.
It used to be like that with education. Then ... people thought that a basic Grade School education for everyone was in the interest of all. Similarly, people think the same for health care.
If that were true, and not the usual lie, then you would not give a shit about what you call "income redistribution", Christ called "Bearing one another's burdens", and the Founding Fathers called a threat to the country.
They might want to verify that someone could/would pay before treating them. Who wants to be delayed by a credit check when you are having a timely health issue that needs *immediate* attention?
But we can afford the increase in rates for the insurance owned by private companies.
Fist question, where is all of that cheaper insurance with its better programs Trump promised"
You do understand that the ACA would have worked, and still could, if the States run by Repugnant one would get on board. It works in all other industrialized countries, just not this one.
Why are you once again so proudly showing your stupidity?
So far, the only thing you have brought to the table is calling other people 'Morons'.
Let me ask another question: 'Have you asked your friend Havana Moon what he thinks of Universal Health Care'?
(maybe you should listen to one that has it?)