Right, I do not consider atheism or religion to be important.Bart Ehrman is probably the most widely acclaimed atheist religious scholar in America.
Right, I do not consider atheism or religion to be important.Bart Ehrman is probably the most widely acclaimed atheist religious scholar in America.
Most of Christianity has been negative. Even Medieval priests owned slaves..
Therefore, he can and does openly state that the Christian influence on Western history is massive, and much of it was undeniably positive.
You never studied history, Hugo.Always inhibited it, from my study of history.
Karl Marx wasn't alive in 1950. Nevertheless, his philosophies still are practice today, mostly by Democrats.No one is a marxist. My god, you are stuck in 1950.
This is a lie. You consider your own religions to be important...each and every one of them.Right, I do not consider atheism or religion to be important.
So? Presentism fallacy.Most of Christianity has been negative. Even Medieval priests owned slaves.
That was over 1,000 years ago.Christianity has been negative. Even Medieval priests owned slaves.
all the religions had slaves.Most of Christianity has been negative. Even Medieval priests owned slaves.
serfdom comes from the Diocletian reforms of the Roman empire which bonded chosen families to the land as the tax collecting forces, and with the monetization from the yield of the land going to the gentry for taxation purposes.That was over 1,000 years ago.
Slavery existed all over; in Europe, Africa, Americas, Asia back then.
You can't use that a reason to say Christianity was a uniquely evil and oppressive force in the world.
Slavery was largely replaced in the European Middle Ages by serfdom and feudalism. In part because the church discouraged the enslavement of Christians and encouraged the liberation of slaves.
Slavery did continue to exist at large scale in Byzantine and Islamic-controlled areas of the Mediterranean.