Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
As a Jurist...capable of critical thinking and not mindlessly being led to a particular conclusion by a lawyer I would ask my self two fundamental questions.
#1. Is there evidence, beyond reasonable doubt, that these young men posed an explicit threat to Mr. Dunn's life and limb?
If not...
#2. Were his actions premeditated?
If the answer to question #1 is Yes, then he's not guilty.
If the answer to #1 is no and the answer to question #2 is yes, they he's guilty of first degree murder. If the answer to question #2 is no, then he's guilty of 2nd degree murder.
So, in your view... a person must be able to prove their INNOCENCE beyond a reasonable doubt? Because that is what it seems you are suggesting.