welcome back freak
your ducking not me.
The whole jist of our debate is recession 08 yes/no
your crawfishing into something you might win cause you were soundly crushed on the main issue.
Pleae enlighten us on how the latest data yet AGAIN shows a healthy economy confirms your 70% chance of recession.
The whole debate is the recession chances in 2008. That is the first thing that you have gotten right. Exactly HOW is it that you crushed me toppy? By calling me.... SINGLE?
AGAIN, since you are so moronic you can't seem to grasp this.... CURRENT numbers do not reflect the future. They reflect the past.
For the FINAL time... CAN YOU ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING AND HOW THEY WILL AFFECT THE FUTURE.... ie 2008.....
1) Higher energy costs.... which reduce consumer spending in other areas
2) Higher food costs.... which also reduce consumer spending in other areas
3) Declining dollar.... which decreases purchasing power and further enhances the rise in energy/food/commodities/basic materials
4) The always higher healthcare costs
5) For those families with kids in college... add in the rising costs of education
COUPLE THE ABOVE with the continuing credit crunch and we have big problems. With regards to the credit crunch, please explain the following which you ducked yesterday....
1) If as you say the mortgage problem is better because of the fed cuts... please explain why it is that the national average for the 1,3 and 5-year ARMs are ALL ABOVE the average for the 15 yr fixed. Can you explain that to us toppy..... oh MBA guru genius?
2) Why do you hype the retail sales of xmas numbers, yet fail to address the negative numbers? Like say.... the fact that year-over-year foreclosures were up 68% in November. Again, a backward looking number, but since you are obsessed with CURRENT numbers being reported, I would like to know why you ignore this one.