I don't see any enlightenment arising from hyper-partisanship.
Just for the edification of a few of you. If you go to You Tube and watch this film, in the 4th part at the 14:20 minute mark the President of the United States says with no equivication that "We have no evidence that Saddam Hussain was involved with the September the 11th". Can't get any clearer than that. Bush said it himself. If you continue to watch it from there you will see the father of one of the people who died in the WTC call him a liar because he told us early on he was involved.
Yeah, I watched this last week. It's very good. It's why I am back on the Paul bandwagon. The fact that he might associate with some folks that solicit racists is trivial. There is no greater threat to minorities or any American than the war machine.
LOL. I don't even know where to start with that. That's funny for so many reasons. The first being: as if you were ever off Paul's nutz
I wanted to find that guys e-mail and tell him he was not a bad guy for wanting his son's name on the bomb to hit those responsible for his son's death. Too bad his president didn't want to go after the people that orchestrated the murder of his son and 3000 other people.I thought that guys story was really powerful. For one, it should make us a little more considerate of those fooled by the propaganda that followed 9/11. I can't blame that poor guy for wanting revenge. Those that continue to spout the nonsense, in the face of what we know now, though...
Hopefully, we are raising future generations that are less trusting of authority.
I took down the sigpic, drowned my sorrows and removed some pro-Paul posts on my blog. So where was your second choice to start?
I know you lefties really don't care about our government stealing money and lives from the poor to finance the war machine, but some of us see it as more than just a political football.
Second choice to start:
"Might Associate"? I think we can safely say that case is closed.
Third choice to start:
"Trivial"?
Yeah.....ummmm okay.
In comparison to the state's pursuit of perpetual war, it is less than trivial......
Ike was a Republican---there is no way he could be right. Or do you maybe think he was referring to some thing LARGER than republicans and democrats ?
So---we shouldn't try ? Does it mean give up ? Is it inevitable ? Seriously--what is this movie encouraging people to do ?