'You ain't getting it here.' Louisiana store owner locks out Border Patrol agents

On Saturday, Dec. 6, a convenience store manager in Louisiana locked out a group of Border Patrol agents, denying them entry to the store.

Wayne Davis, who is assistant manager of the store in Kenner, was helping a customer when he noticed two unmarked SUVs pull into the parking lot and stop at the front of the store.

After seeing agents wearing border patrol vests exit the two vehicles, Davis locked the door from behind the counter as the agents approached, WWL Louisiana reported.

Then he proceeded to taunt them, lol.

View: https://youtu.be/8yO_TUNd0Xg?si=DlgusixsSOOet1AI


Wow what a brave pussy
 
Nope. It is open to the public.

Being disorderly or drunk is grounds for prevention, just as no shoes or shirt is a requirement to enter many establishments.
Who has said ICE agents are a protected class? I highly doubt they would become disorderly, they were just hungry.
So, to you, it would be OK to prevent a few lawyers to enter an establishment just because you don't like lawyers? Hmmm...

I definitely question your expertise...
ICE is not a race, religion, or sexual orientation and until they are they can be barred by business owners that choose to do so.

Put on your big boy pants and deal.
 
On Saturday, Dec. 6, a convenience store manager in Louisiana locked out a group of Border Patrol agents, denying them entry to the store.

Wayne Davis, who is assistant manager of the store in Kenner, was helping a customer when he noticed two unmarked SUVs pull into the parking lot and stop at the front of the store.

After seeing agents wearing border patrol vests exit the two vehicles, Davis locked the door from behind the counter as the agents approached, WWL Louisiana reported.

Then he proceeded to taunt them, lol.

View: https://youtu.be/8yO_TUNd0Xg?si=DlgusixsSOOet1AI



Hopefully boycotts put the scumbag out of business.
 
It started, as far as I can trace with Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the courts ruled that under the 14th Amendment people of certain characteristics were in high likelihood to face particularized systematic discrimination, and in order to attain “equal protection of the law” required heightened protection due to the historic systemized exclusion and subordination of them.


You should take an introductory law class, fake lawyer, seriously.

Here is the actual case;


Notice that the phrase {heightened protection due to the historic systemized exclusion and subordination of them} is nowhere in the case. Further that the idea of "protected classes" is contrary to the equal protection clause of the 14th. Further Brown regards the dissolution of state sponsored, institutional racism. You advocate for the implementation of such and normalization of the systematic racism Brown struck down.

But you commies always demand that some are more equal than others.
 
Back
Top