You have no RIGHT to post on JPP, social media, or anywhere else that you did not cre

anatta said:
Section 230 allows this capricious banning -it has to stop -it's squashing political speech
Click to expand...

You do realize that if Section 230 is removed, you could get personally sued for what you post on any platform.

Section 230 shields that liability for you right now.

Is that what you really want? Someone to decide to sue you because of the lying shit you post on the internet?
 
Diesel said:
I don't use Facebook. Try again. You're such a broken record of misinformation parroting to me that I don't know how to consume information.
Click to expand...




general you.


you consume it better than most. but there are still disagreements we have about it.
 
blackascoal said:
Listening to all the right-wing noise about being “censored “ from posting on social media platforms they did not create just gets dumber by the hour. No one has a right to post on any platform at any time. Posting is granted based on your adherence to terms of use, and anyone can be banned from posting for as long as the platform creators choose to ban you if you choose to ignore the terms that granted you access.

One would think this concept would be pretty simple and easy to understand, but it isn’t for people who cannot figure out how voting machines and elections work. They’d rather whine like babies and feign butt-hurt insult than simply adhere to the rules. They’d rather claim they have no other way to communicate unless platform owners give them access to users that they themselves did not gather. And they believe they have a right to say whatever they want to say under the guise of “freedom of speech” while they take no responsibility for the guidelines that the owners must follow.

Those making such claims are ignorant babies and should be ignored.
Click to expand...


please go back and read the 1st amendment to the constitution. It says nothing like you posted, it makes no limitations on free speech except you cannot yell "fire" in a crowed theatre.
 
LV426 said:
You do realize that if Section 230 is removed, you could get personally sued for what you post on any platform.

Section 230 shields that liability for you right now.

Is that what you really want? Someone to decide to sue you because of the lying shit you post on the internet?
Click to expand...

absolutely. lawsuits have to have damages -you getting permanently bent is not a damage
 
Primavera said:
Isn't propaganda by its very definition, false news?
Click to expand...
it is.
the problem is there is very little of absolutism in politics - just shades of lies - usually wrapped around
some kernal of truthiness to make it palatable

Mark Twain
“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.”
 
LV426 said:
Yeah...here's the thing, Anatta...yesterday, the DOJ charged a social media influencer with election interference for spreading misinformation about the 2016 election on the internet.

He faces 10 years.

How is what he did any different from what you did all year last year?

The damage is to our elections, and the punishment for that damage is 10 years.
Click to expand...
"What Mackey allegedly did to interfere with this process – by soliciting voters to cast their ballots via text – amounted to nothing short of vote theft"
Click to expand...
seriously STFU -if truth were a metric you'd be duct taped across the mouth
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top