You stupid idiots got played, by Cracker Barrel!

I am sure that Hershel will be back with pride in time.

The Radical Anti-white Bigots are a quickly passing thing, just like BLM. Racial Hatred is powerless in the face of good cooking.

White Guys are as American as apple pie! Speaking of which, I did have a Cracker Barrel apple pie once, my wife bought it for my birthday, instead of a cake, as she knows apple pie is my favorite. It was delicious.

-
 
Explain. Give examples. JFK was "woke". Was he a racist?
JFK was not woke.

On the other hand, woke includes such core ideas as:

Diversity is unity. In reality, diversity is divisive and when applied with other woke doctrines ends up being racist.

CRT and Disparate Impact theory are two forms of woke racial and social "justice." Both apply racism in the name of "equality" and "justice." They do this by making certain racial and ethnic groups "victims" and other racial and ethnic groups "oppressors." Everyone is sorted into one of these two groups. Victims cannot by woke standards and dogma be racist even when members of that group overtly are exactly that. Oppressors are always racist no matter how fairly they treat others.

Wokeism also gave rise to "cancel culture" where some individuals and certain groups are completely ostracized simply for who they are or not going along with wokeism dogma. The people and groups become oppressed by the woke, economically and socially while suffering from the negative effects of racism in some cases.

Bigotry and oppression thrive in woke culture. The woke seek to silence any voice that challenges or questions their doctrine.

By the way, JFK was probably the most dangerous president in modern American history. Within his roughly 3 years in office, he came within a hair's breadth on at least two and possibly as many as six occasions of getting the US into a global nuclear war. He, in many ways, set the stage for massive US intervention in Vietnam.
 
JFK was not woke.

On the other hand, woke includes such core ideas as:

Diversity is unity. In reality, diversity is divisive and when applied with other woke doctrines ends up being racist.

CRT and Disparate Impact theory are two forms of woke racial and social "justice." Both apply racism in the name of "equality" and "justice." They do this by making certain racial and ethnic groups "victims" and other racial and ethnic groups "oppressors." Everyone is sorted into one of these two groups. Victims cannot by woke standards and dogma be racist even when members of that group overtly are exactly that. Oppressors are always racist no matter how fairly they treat others.

Wokeism also gave rise to "cancel culture" where some individuals and certain groups are completely ostracized simply for who they are or not going along with wokeism dogma. The people and groups become oppressed by the woke, economically and socially while suffering from the negative effects of racism in some cases.

Bigotry and oppression thrive in woke culture. The woke seek to silence any voice that challenges or questions their doctrine.

By the way, JFK was probably the most dangerous president in modern American history. Within his roughly 3 years in office, he came within a hair's breadth on at least two and possibly as many as six occasions of getting the US into a global nuclear war. He, in many ways, set the stage for massive US intervention in Vietnam.
Diversity is divisive? In other words black and white people shouldn't blend and mix.

Republicans have ostracized their families for voting differently. They have promoted canceling anything they disagree with.

Bigotry and oppression? It is done on Blacks.

JFK the most dangerous president in history? :rofl2: The same man who put man on the moon.

You are hilarious. Keep going.
 
What's not to love?!


1756268520723.png



Make the eggs over easy, and go with the country ham. Just a shake of cinnamon on the peaches please.


I am proud to be an American, and I've got no problem with White Guys.



-
 
Last edited:
Diversity is divisive? In other words black and white people shouldn't blend and mix.

Gross simplification on your part. Think more like Tower of Babel. When a society has no distinct culture, language, or social norms it ceases to be a cohesive society. In wokeism and on the Left, diversity means encouraging everyone to retain their distinct culture, language, etc. For example, California prints their ballots for elections in 27 languages. Let that sink in for a moment.

Diversity encourages people NOT blending and mixing because if they did, diversity would go down and less diversity is bad in wokeism and on the Left.
Republicans have ostracized their families for voting differently. They have promoted canceling anything they disagree with.

Nothing compared to Leftists doing that.




Bigotry and oppression? It is done on Blacks.

And by Blacks. Your cherry-picked example is just a trivial objection.
JFK the most dangerous president in history? :rofl2: The same man who put man on the moon.

So? He can also be the most dangerous president in history. Hitler gave the world the VW Beetle. Doesn't change that he was also a monster.

During the Cuban missile crisis, we came within one person's call of an all-out nuclear conflict at least three times. The fate of the world was in on man's hands at those points, and it wasn't Kennedy that was making the call. Kennedy caused at least two of those crises by his own bad decisions.

For example, Kennedy insisted on deploying over 100 Thor and Jupiter IRBM's to Europe against the advice of every military officer and his cabinet. That resulted in the USSR putting similar missiles in Cuba, a country they had ignored up to that point entirely.
 
Gross simplification on your part. Think more like Tower of Babel. When a society has no distinct culture, language, or social norms it ceases to be a cohesive society. In wokeism and on the Left, diversity means encouraging everyone to retain their distinct culture, language, etc. For example, California prints their ballots for elections in 27 languages. Let that sink in for a moment.

Diversity encourages people NOT blending and mixing because if they did, diversity would go down and less diversity is bad in wokeism and on the Left.


Nothing compared to Leftists doing that.






And by Blacks. Your cherry-picked example is just a trivial objection.


So? He can also be the most dangerous president in history. Hitler gave the world the VW Beetle. Doesn't change that he was also a monster.

During the Cuban missile crisis, we came within one person's call of an all-out nuclear conflict at least three times. The fate of the world was in on man's hands at those points, and it wasn't Kennedy that was making the call. Kennedy caused at least two of those crises by his own bad decisions.

For example, Kennedy insisted on deploying over 100 Thor and Jupiter IRBM's to Europe against the advice of every military officer and his cabinet. That resulted in the USSR putting similar missiles in Cuba, a country they had ignored up to that point entirely.
AI Overview
1756269740944.png
1756269741057.png
+3

The assertion that President Kennedy insisted on deploying over 100 Thor and Jupiter IRBMs to Europe is incorrect. While the Eisenhower administration initiated the deployment of these missiles, and they were in Europe during Kennedy's presidency, the Kennedy administration's focus was on replacing the obsolete and vulnerable Jupiter missiles in Italy and Turkey with more modern Polaris submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs). These efforts were part of a secret agreement with the Soviet Union to de-escalate the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Sorry buddy. Your contrarian way proves to be incorrect.
 
AI Overview
View attachment 57389
View attachment 57390
+3

The assertion that President Kennedy insisted on deploying over 100 Thor and Jupiter IRBMs to Europe is incorrect. While the Eisenhower administration initiated the deployment of these missiles, and they were in Europe during Kennedy's presidency, the Kennedy administration's focus was on replacing the obsolete and vulnerable Jupiter missiles in Italy and Turkey with more modern Polaris submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs). These efforts were part of a secret agreement with the Soviet Union to de-escalate the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Sorry buddy. Your contrarian way proves to be incorrect.
Your AI source is wrong, as AI often is.

I wrote a rather lengthy paper on this for my master's.

Try reading

71NgDUl7ZyL._AC_UY218_.jpg


or

71d1YGc8PsL.jpg


Among other well documented, scholarly sources on the subject. They back what I said. Kennedy let the placement go forward even as his advisors argued against it--think Biden and Afghanistan here. His advisors argued that the Atlas ICBM and Polaris missiles would be available within a couple of years and the IRBMs would be obsolescent at that point and shouldn't be deployed both to not antagonize the Soviets and because the cost of doing so wasn't justified when they'd be removed shortly after deployment.

Kennedy on the other hand, wanted to look tough after the fall of Cuba to Casto, the Bay of Pigs fascio, and the Berlin Crisis of 1961. Kennedy's political posturing caused the Cuban missile crisis.
 
Back
Top