ZERO, not a single Democrat willing to support A WORKING MOM as Supreme Court Justice

votebiden said:
agree
Click to expand...

Altering people's words just makes you a scum bag moron. I bet your mother cemented up her cunt after you leaked out. Go fuck yourself you duplicitous puke. Or maybe you're just so fucking stupid you don't realize people can see for themselves what I actually wrote.
 
Bigdog said:
Dems want anyone that believes innocent Human Life is Sacred to be barred from the court. How dare they think that. It tells us all we need to know about 'people are just worms' atheists.

BTW, Pelosi and Biden claim to be 'devout' Catholics.
Click to expand...

Nothing, including human life itself, has absolute value, because absolute value isn't logical. It's in fact an insane concept.
Everything has value qualitatively. An unwanted child is not destined for a life qualitatively worth anything. That's self evident.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Nothing, including human life itself, has absolute value, because absolute value isn't logical. It's in fact an insane concept.
Everything has value qualitatively. An unwanted child is not destined for a life qualitatively worth anything. That's self evident.
Click to expand...

This is how socialist atheists justify their social eugenics and treating people like cattle.

:palm:
 
Earl said:
But not the ethical treatment of the unborn.
Click to expand...

Correct, although ethical isn't the applicable word.
Not when it tramples on the rights of a living woman.

I don't worship non-functional clumps of biology who are at best people in process and not actual people.
We had human embryos in formaldehyde jars in school.
They never so much as said "Good morning" when we walked in, but I guess that they're people with rights to you.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Correct, although ethical isn't the applicable word.
Not when it tramples on the rights of a living woman.

I don't worship non-functional clumps of biology who are at best people in process and not actual people.
We had human embryos in formaldehyde jars in school.
They never so much as said "Good morning" when we walked in, but I guess that they're people with rights to you.
Click to expand...

"People" indicates a life in progress.

Roe vs. Wade will just be a memory soon and there is squat that you can do about it.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Correct, although ethical isn't the applicable word.
Not when it tramples on the rights of a living woman.

I don't worship non-functional clumps of biology who are at best people in process and not actual people.
We had human embryos in formaldehyde jars in school.
They never so much as said "Good morning" when we walked in, but I guess that they're people with rights to you.
Click to expand...

You're a BLOB of cells.
 
Earl said:
"People" indicates a life in progress.

Roe vs. Wade will just be a memory soon and there is squat that you can do about it.
Click to expand...

As a 74 year old man, I'm not looking to have an abortion. My daughter's too old for that.
But I certainly wouldn't live in a shithole state that bans it because my neighbors who put up with it would be mentally diseased.
Civilized America has abortion on demand with or without Roe V Wade.
Plus I'm pretty sure that the new thirteen member SCOTUS will uphold it anyway.
 
Earl said:
"People" indicates a life in progress.

Roe vs. Wade will just be a memory soon and there is squat that you can do about it.
Click to expand...

As a 74 year old man, I'm not looking to have an abortion. My daughter's too old for that.
But I certainly wouldn't live in a shithole state that bans it because my neighbors who put up with it would be mentally diseased.
Civilized America has abortion on demand with or without Roe V Wade.
Plus I'm pretty sure that the new thirteen member SCOTUS will uphold it anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top