Zimmerman ADMITS to following Martin

LMAO... Sorry, but there is nothing wrong with following someone. It is not against the law. It is not instigating conflict. No matter how emo you want to get.

meh...what if you have a glock in your hand? You're instigating.

I absolutely agree, this is why I don't understand his attorney allowing this interview, even with Hannity, who was obviously trying to help George!


I read Gretta Van Sustern's blog and she can't believe Zimmerman's attorney let him on Hannity. She says that the prosecution will use the interview as evidence, compare it to his other accounts and also the one he eventually uses in court. She stated she would never let a client give an interview!

Word on the street is Hannity or a surrogate is helping finance Zimmy's defense fund. Zimmy's also reopened his website.

Also, Zimmy called Babawawa and tried to extort an extended hotel stay for him and his family in exchange for an interview. Babawawa told him to stuff it with a chiquita banana
.

this is exactly why this thread makes no sense. zappa acts as if zimmerman admitted something he never admitted before. fact is, he did. this thread is bogus and adds nothing new the topic.

You mean other than the fact that Zimmy said killing Trayvon was an act of God?

I swear...Zimmerman's starting to make Casey Anthony look like Einstein. Fortunately, he's not young, white and pretty so he won't get off like she did.
 
how do you explain the scalp laceration and broken nose? did martin attack zimmerman after he was shot?

Just maybe, George initiated the first contact, and Trayvon fought back. George couldn't fight, so he shot the kid. See, I can play the speculation game, too.

The sad thing, Trayvon can't give his side of the story, the forensic evidence is the only thing that can do it for him. At this point, I have a hard time believing Zimmerman because the story keeps changing.

I feel the full "truth" will never be known.
 
meh...what if you have a glock in your hand? You're instigating.






Word on the street is Hannity or a surrogate is helping finance Zimmy's defense fund. Zimmy's also reopened his website.

Also, Zimmy called Babawawa and tried to extort an extended hotel stay for him and his family in exchange for an interview. Babawawa told him to stuff it with a chiquita banana
.



You mean other than the fact that Zimmy said killing Trayvon was an act of God?

I swear...Zimmerman's starting to make Casey Anthony look like Einstein. Fortunately, he's not young, white and pretty so he won't get off like she did.


this isn't the thread about zimmerman and god howey. zappa created this thread because he believed that zimmerman finally admits he was following martin at some point, when the truth is, zimmerman already told the 911 dispatcher the same exact thing.

what if a nuke in his hand? you can speculate all day long howey.
 
Just maybe, George initiated the first contact, and Trayvon fought back. George couldn't fight, so he shot the kid. See, I can play the speculation game, too.

The sad thing, Trayvon can't give his side of the story, the forensic evidence is the only thing that can do it for him. At this point, I have a hard time believing Zimmerman because the story keeps changing.

I feel the full "truth" will never be known.

kinda like the kennedy assassination, huh?
 
George Zimmerman Prosecution May Use TV Interview as Evidence

http://news.yahoo.com/george-zimmer...-evidence-210121704--abc-news-topstories.html

Trayvon_Martin_cartoon_1200pixels.jpg


zimmerman-prison.jpg
 
so you're saying that if I feel threatened by somebody following me around the block, I can turn and knock the shit out of him/her no matter if they were just walking the same way?

Someone following you around the block may not be threatening to you. But someone slowly following you in a vehicle, then stopping the vehicle, getting out and following you, without explanation, can be very threatening. Especially if it's dark and the area's deserted.
 
My personal opinion is that the defense isn't going to hinge on whether or not Z got out of his car to keep tabs on M. But rather the fact that M circled back to Z and assaulted him.

I think you might be mistaken about that.
 
and you think i have a reading comprehension issue. what part of "later point" do you not understand? what part of "followed him at that point" do you not understand.

he informed the 911 operator that he was following him at one point. then he allegedly stopped and was headed back to his car. so him admitting this is old news, except to hacks like you and zappa.

Pure Zimmy-favoring speculation on your part.
 
There is no absolute proof it happened the way Zimmerman stated, either, unless there is forensic evidence. It is just Zimmerman's account and the man has proven to be devious.

It boggles the mind, huh. We're supposed to take Zimmerman's word for everything... just because.
 
this isn't the thread about zimmerman and god howey. zappa created this thread because he believed that zimmerman finally admits he was following martin at some point, when the truth is, zimmerman already told the 911 dispatcher the same exact thing.

what if a nuke in his hand? you can speculate all day long howey.

And when he is told they don't need him to do that. His next sentence was, "OK"...
 
This is why I had to stop arguing about this. Everytime some smirking asshat talks about how there's nothing wrong with following someone - he had every right! I feel like I would like to take my high heel and grind it into their face.

What a stupid effing thing to say. Only, only, only, a man could ever say that, I believe nearly almost always (if not ALWAYS, every single time, which is probably the truth) a white man, and a effing big stupid entitled one too.

If I ever get a gun it's going to be so I can shoot some entitled fuckwit who thinks he has a "right" to follow me. Then I am going to claim stand your ground.

Reminds me of the right wing supporters of the patriot act when it was first up.
"if you aren't doing anything wrong you have nothing to worry about"
And now they whine about it and make like it was all a liberal thing robbing their liberty.
And the TP caucus members voted to strengthen and re-up it.
 
Zimmerman clearly had to do something under the stand your ground Bush doctrine thingy. After all the black guy was going to do something!
 
So, Zimmerman should have just allowed this "unarmed", "uninvolved in any crime", "nor threatening anyone" teen to bash his head into a concrete sidewalk? Because that isn't committing any crime is it? When he states to Zimmerman while beating him on the ground, "You're gonna' die tonight, motherfucker"! Yeah, what an innocent young man, real pillar of the community....

GTFOH!


If Zimmerman had not followed Martin, that "unarmed", "uninvolved in any crime", "not threatening anyone" teen would have just gone on home.

As to Zimmerman's CLAIMS Martin said what he did...you've got some audio from the scene to back up Zimmerman's allegations, right?

Otherwise all you've got is the word of a man who has repeatedly changed his story since the night of the murder.
 
Last edited:
my first post in this thread had no debate issues? wow. just wow. just when i thought you couldn't get anymore dishonest.

all you've done is WHINE, WHINE and WHINE about insults while not actually debating a single thing. if you really cared about debate, you would debate instead of insulting me and whining about insults. you insult me all the time, but it is ok when you do it.....however, you've made it crystal clear you are not here to debate, you are solely to bitch about me and turn this thread into yurt bitch fest. you have not addressed the points i made in my first post, nor any subsequent post. you've turned this thread in whiny hate filled rant about me.

what is wrong with you?


here's Yurt's very first response...note the "debate issues" he mentions:


good lord, we all know he followed him at that point you ignorant tard. it was the later point that is of contention. further, following someone does not necessarily mean he initiated anything.

how many freakin times must you be told this? it is like talking to a small child.


Yeah, that's what Yurt calls "civil" debate...
 
this isn't the thread about zimmerman and god howey. zappa created this thread because he believed that zimmerman finally admits he was following martin at some point, when the truth is, zimmerman already told the 911 dispatcher the same exact thing.

what if a nuke in his hand? you can speculate all day long howey.


Apparently you can't/won't address Howey's points either..BIG surprise!
 
here's Yurt's very first response...note the "debate issues" he mentions:





Yeah, that's what Yurt calls "civil" debate...

where did i call that civil debate zappa? i actually flat out said in this thread it was insults coupled with debate. why do you have to lie all the time? let us point out the debate you ignored so you could whine about insults:

good lord, we all know he followed him at that point you ignorant tard. it was the later point that is of contention. further, following someone does not necessarily mean he initiated anything.

how many freakin times must you be told this? it is like talking to a small child.
 
Back
Top