Zimmerman ADMITS to following Martin

Pure Zimmy-favoring speculation on your part.

just going on what we've been told. it is not favoring him one way or the other. the 911 call indicates he was parked.

unlike you, i haven't made up mind on this case and been over zealous in convicting someone.
 
Apparently you can't/won't address Howey's points either..BIG surprise!

more lies. i addressed each point. he pointed out that you mentioned the god statement by him, but you didn't and correctly pointed that out and showed him that your thread is pointless as zimmerman already admitted he was following him.

then i addressed his gun comment with the nuke and speculation comment.

seriously, can you stop lying and whining and actual debate the points in the thread YOU created?
 
I agree that you did not say "celebrate" .. my bad, I apologize.

However, you have no moral ground to talk about vigilante justice when in fact you support Zimmerman and his murder of an unarmed teenager who was not involved in any crime, nor threatening anyone.


vigilante justice ?.....Wasn't it the black panthers that actually had the balls to put a price on Zimmermans head....wtf do you call that ?

And a note Zappa from a very early post of his....following someone is NOT initiating contact....why can't you just stick to the actual facts ?
Z never denied trying to 'keep in eye on the kid'......it was on the 911 call take from day one....
 
more lies. i addressed each point. he pointed out that you mentioned the god statement by him, but you didn't and correctly pointed that out and showed him that your thread is pointless as zimmerman already admitted he was following him.

then i addressed his gun comment with the nuke and speculation comment.

seriously, can you stop lying and whining and actual debate the points in the thread YOU created?


That's right...I forgot.

You're allowed to dictate to everyone else just exactly what is and isn't considered a valid point for discussion.

My apologies.
 
where did i call that civil debate zappa? i actually flat out said in this thread it was insults coupled with debate. why do you have to lie all the time? let us point out the debate you ignored so you could whine about insults:



To sum up for those new to the thread...

Right out of the box...post #2!...you were a douchebag.

Now you whine about some ridiculous minutiae so you can continue to ignore the fact you were a douchebag from the get go, uninterested in ANY kind of debate.
 
To sum up for those new to the thread...

Right out of the box...post #2!...you were a douchebag.

Now you whine about some ridiculous minutiae so you can continue to ignore the fact you were a douchebag from the get go, uninterested in ANY kind of debate.

you said i called that civil debate. that is a lie. not minutiae. no surprise you don't know what the truth is.

and it is clear to all, you're only interested in insulting and not debate. thanks for proving that. again.
 
Someone following you around the block may not be threatening to you. But someone slowly following you in a vehicle, then stopping the vehicle, getting out and following you, without explanation, can be very threatening. Especially if it's dark and the area's deserted.


The kid was about 6 houses away from his destination....what is that, about 30 seconds at a run if you feel threatened......this kid felt he could kick the shit out of GZ and
he did .....ALL physical evidence and eye witness accounts agree with that......
 
The kid was about 6 houses away from his destination....what is that, about 30 seconds at a run if you feel threatened......this kid felt he could kick the shit out of GZ and
he did .....ALL physical evidence and eye witness accounts agree with that......

If that is the case, why is he being tried? Apparently, the prosecutor in this case sees things differtly than you all knowing self. I bet they have more information than you do.
 
you said i called that civil debate. that is a lie. not minutiae. no surprise you don't know what the truth is.

and it is clear to all, you're only interested in insulting and not debate. thanks for proving that. again.

Oh...so you never intended to have a civil discussion.

You admit you came into this thread with the sole intention of being a douchebag...got it.

What is clear is that once again you never intended to debate this with me, you just wanted to whine.
 
If that is the case, why is he being tried? Apparently, the prosecutor in this case sees things differtly than you all knowing self. I bet they have more information than you do.

I'll bet they do too.....but as the saying goes, You can indict a ham sandwich in this great country......

and we'll all have to wait and see what the prosecution has in its little bag a tricks....

lets put it this way....ALL the physical evidence and eye witness accounts that we know about agree with Zimmerman's account of the confrontation....
and I'm sure even that will get its share of spin and misinterpretation....
 
Oh...so you never intended to have a civil discussion.

You admit you came into this thread with the sole intention of being a douchebag...got it.

What is clear is that once again you never intended to debate this with me, you just wanted to whine.

Jesus H. Christ guys.....get over yourselves....its like Onecell got himself a clone now......
 
Oh...so you never intended to have a civil discussion.

You admit you came into this thread with the sole intention of being a douchebag...got it.

What is clear is that once again you never intended to debate this with me, you just wanted to whine.

actually, i never admitted any such thing. you're just a petty whiny liar. you insult me all the time, frequently in threads i don't even post in. you constantly call me "yurtard" in numerous threads i don't post in. i have no love for you and have no problem giving your insults back COUPLED with debate.

if i just wanted to be a douche (notice your continued insults) i would not have tried to discuss the issue of the thread. what i tried to do, was get you to debate your OP. over and over. but you never did. all you did was insult and then whine about insults. you can't defend your thread, so you will stick to whining about my insults, all the while, insulting me.

that you don't see the utter stupidity of your comments is astounding. i clearly intended to debate your thread in my first post. you're just a hypersensitive pussy that can't handle when he gets insulted, but has no problem dishing insults out.

you can't debate worth shit. you can't even defend this thread. TFF.
 
If that is the case, why is he being tried? Apparently, the prosecutor in this case sees things differtly than you all knowing self. I bet they have more information than you do.

nice try. this only got prosecuted after national attention. ergo....political reasons, unless they have more information we don't know about.
 
Back
Top