This!!! Is my point on Due Process.

The first step is to prove they are alien invaders.
Already done.
Wouldn't letting them have day in court be a great way to prove it?
Already done.
The problem is that Trump would lose it, and that would put his entire unAmerican project into question.
Deporting illegal aliens is part of his job, Sybil.
You call him an illegal invader.
Because an illegal alien broke the law. They are illegal invader.
Wouldn't that far right hateful position be butressed by winning in court? You should ask for him to be in court. But in your hating heart, you know he would be found clean.
Already done.
 
The judges were placed by Trump, Bush, and Clinton.
What judges, Sybil?
Categorizing them as liberal cunts says lot about you, but nothing sbout the system,
What 'system', Sybil?
or that Trump masks remaks insulting and lying about any judge they does not give a result he wants.
No judge or court has any authority over Trump's authority of the executive branch, Sybil.
You do not know what you are. It is pathetic and ugly. You should take stock of your horrible attitude .
So you think the Constitution is a 'horrible attidude', eh?
 
You don't seem to know what due process is. Due process in the US is based on English law.
No, it isn't.
Hardly a false equivalence since the are not the same thing.
A false equivalence is NOT about the same thing. To learn what 'equivalence' means.
Due process doesn't guarantee a good defense. It simply means no one can be deprived of life, liberty or property without a court (or jury) hearing both sides of the case and making a determination.
Already done.
No one is forced to take a plea deal. The advice may to to take the deal but no one is required to take it and then they still have to go to the court and stand in front of a judge who asks if they made the decision to plead guilty of their own free will and if it is true that they are guilty.
In that case, you are basically representing yourself, since the public defender avoids trial.
 
When a cop arrests someone that have to be indicted and before a judge to hold them for longer than a couple of days. That due process thing where there is a legal process that must be followed that involves a judge.
30 days, Poorboy. That's federal law. Indictment does not have to occur. Only filing the court papers or appearing before a judge or magistrate.
Deportation does not require indictment.

They've already lost their case before being picked up, or will get their hearing after they've been arrested.
 
Yes, it is. Do people in France, England, Japan, get "due process?" Is having a pubic defender versus a team of top tier lawyers you hired, "equal before the law?" His rant is just that. It's empty rhetoric and nonsense. It hews closely to a homunculus fallacy in that he is really making a circular argument.
Who cares about other countries? We don't live in them, we live here.
 
Have you read it?
Here's how his "deals" failed his casinos. And this is with regular infusions of his father's millions when things got dire.

"Trump assembled his casino empire by borrowing money at such high interest rates — after telling regulators he would not — that the businesses had almost no chance to succeed.

His casino companies made four trips to bankruptcy court, each time persuading bondholders to accept less money rather than be wiped out. But the companies repeatedly added more expensive debt and returned to the court for protection from lenders.

After narrowly escaping financial ruin in the early 1990s by delaying payments on his debts, Trump avoided a second potential crisis by taking his casinos public and shifting the risk to stockholders.

And he never was able to draw in enough gamblers to support all of the borrowing. During a decade when other casinos here thrived, Trump's lagged, posting huge losses year after year. Stock and bondholders lost more than $1.5 billion.

All the while, Trump received copious amounts for himself, with the help of a compliant board. In one instance, the Times found, Trump pulled more than $1 million from his failing public company, describing the transaction in securities filings in ways that may have been illegal, according to legal experts.

Trump now says he left Atlantic City at the perfect time. The record, however, shows that he struggled to hang on to his casinos years after the city had peaked, and failed only because his investors no longer wanted him in a management role."



"
 
30 days, Poorboy. That's federal law. Indictment does not have to occur. Only filing the court papers or appearing before a judge or magistrate.
Deportation does not require indictment.

They've already lost their case before being picked up, or will get their hearing after they've been arrested.
I am curious what federal law you think allows for keeping someone in jail for 30 days without an indictment or a judge ruling.
 
Sending them back to their home nation who then tosses them in prison is not an act of the US, but one of the home nation.
When a US judge has ruled they are not to be sent back to that country and the US admits that sending them to the country was a mistake, the act of sending them is an act of the US and an act that violates US law.
 
ROFLMAO.

Derick Chauvin PLED GUILTY to the federal crimes. He had to stand up in court and say he did it. That is due process since he could have refused to admit guilt and gone to trial.

As to the state charges, he had due process since he was able to put on a defense in front of 12 jurors. In the Soviet trials you don't see jurors deciding guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

lol like he had choice given the witch hunt. You're s dick moron.
 
The first step is to prove they are alien invaders. Wouldn't letting them have day in court be a great way to prove it? The problem is that Trump would lose it, and that would put his entire unAmerican project into question . You call him an illegal invader. Wouldn't that far right hateful position be butressed by winning in court? You should ask for him to be in court. But in your hating heart, you know he would be found clean.
You do know that was already established by two courts, don't you? Maybe you're talking about someone else. Who? Which one has never seen a courtroom before as a known illegal?
 
Not necessarily. The judge has to have jurisdiction over the case and has to be following the law...
Oh, please, spare me the libtard tears! You’re whining because we shipped an MS-13 goon back to El Salvador, even though a judge once bought his sob story about rival gangs wanting him gone? Poor baby. Democrats like you keep swearing he’s no gangster, just a sweet soul who, what, accidentally needs protection from a hit squad? That’s some gold-medal mental gymnastics right there, peak lefty logic that’d make a contortionist jealous.

Your “breaking US law” spiel is adorable, but this guy’s MS-13 through and through, ink and all. Kicking him out wasn’t a mistake, it was the system finally waking up. Keep simping for thugs while pretending it’s compassion, it’s the Democrat way! Cry harder, we’re too busy cheering for sanity to care.
 
Back
Top