Let me know when I mistranslated a biblical text, and when you started reading Hebrew.
A simple question for the pro life
- Thread starter stoned
- Start date
Let me know when I mistranslated a biblical text, and when you started reading Hebrew.
Let me know when you're going to show proof of your degrees you claim to have.
It must have come from the Cracker Jack box.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I've studied Hebrew at the graduate level, including the necessity of translating it........however, online interlinears hardly make it a challenge any more......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
is that the place you got your understanding of Christian doctrines?.......
What degrees do you claim to have? Are you going to be like Stelakh and claim you have something you're unwilling to prove? Two cowards.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I was never wrong.....I did not state previously that the Bible specifically said Satan was an angel....I said that Christianity teaches that he was....and there is sufficient support in the totality of Scripture to support that doctrine......however, you attempted to claim Christianity was wrong and that you have not proved and that you are not right about.......so don't talk to me about dishonesty......
No, actually there isn't, it is based on mistranslations
Who told you, Stelakh? You believe that liar?
And yet you railed so hard for so long against admitting the only claim I made, that the bible does not specifically and directly tell us the nature of Satan's existence.
I claimed that people were wrong, and that Christianity bases its dogma on presumption, supposition and lack of hard fact.
I have been honest in my approach, whereas you have not.
You have attempted to prevaricate, obfuscate and deliberately misinterpret the comments that I have made. I will talk to you about dishonesty so long as you continue to engage in smokescreen tactics to hide the fact that a comment that I made was in fact true, and your eventual admission of that fact is all the proof I need of the charges of your attempt to obscure the truth.
No, I read actual scholars who read the oldest documents in the original language. Biblical criticism is a fairly new field, being you could lose your life before the 19th century for challenging scripture as was translated by the religions in power.
Discovery of old manuscripts have lead to be better understanding of the text. A lot of tenets are based on interpolations or mistranslations.
Welcome to debating PMP, it is too bad the system corrupted or you could read some of his discussion on evolution, he does exactly what you claim in those debates as well, he's something!
My few exchanges with him leaves me to doubt what he claims about himself.
That is a lie, because you most certainly did.
I said:
To which you replied:
And you dare to try and tell me not to talk to you about dishonesty.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
OH-PLEASE.
The only thing's your missing, are a sandwich board, a soap box, and a street corner; because I'm sure you already have the sackcloth and ashes.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
OH-PLEASE.
Oh, you're back, are you?
Haven't been keeping up with the thread, have we?
Still under your rock and unwilling to provide verifiable proof of what you claim you have? Didn't think so.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
I've been here all along.
How long have you suffered from short term memory loss?
Or don't you remember?
I've been here all along.
How long have you suffered from short term memory loss?
Or don't you remember?
Ah, so you realize that it's pivoted back to the whole point: that religions should not be engaged in making or influencing law. Yes?