Alabama QB Jalen Hurts in NCAA transfer portal, can be contacted by other schools

I see where he graduated so he could play next year as a grad student but I thought leagues had their own rules where no matter the circumstances if you transfer within the league you still had to sit out a year
 
archives said:
I see where he graduated so he could play next year as a grad student but I thought leagues had their own rules where no matter the circumstances if you transfer within the league you still had to sit out a year
Click to expand...

I think he coulda declared for the NFL draft and made some team's roster. But I'm sure this was a calculated decision by him.
 
archives said:
I see where he graduated so he could play next year as a grad student but I thought leagues had their own rules where no matter the circumstances if you transfer within the league you still had to sit out a year
Click to expand...

Not as a graduate student with some stipulations or to a lower division (FBS to FCS).
 
archives said:
I see where he graduated so he could play next year as a grad student but I thought leagues had their own rules where no matter the circumstances if you transfer within the league you still had to sit out a year
Click to expand...

The rule was changed about a year ago, I think. Once you graduate, if you transfer you can play right away. Hurts graduated in 3 years, and still has another year of eligibility. I hate to see him go, but I wish him all the best.
 
WinterBorn said:
The rule was changed about a year ago, I think. Once you graduate, if you transfer you can play right away. Hurts graduated in 3 years, and still has another year of eligibility. I hate to see him go, but I wish him all the best.
Click to expand...

It really didn't matter who was playing QB for Alabama on Monday. The last time someone in Alabama got spanked that bad was MLK, Jr. in the 1960s.
 
CFM said:
It really didn't matter who was playing QB for Alabama on Monday. The last time someone in Alabama got spanked that bad was MLK, Jr. in the 1960s.
Click to expand...

We got our ass kicked, for sure. But the offense moved the ball. At least better than Notre Dame did. The passing and rushing yards are close for both Bama and Clemson. Getting in the red zone and not scoring killed us. But then, I was talking about Clemson defense (especially their D line) back in August or September.
 
WinterBorn said:
We got our ass kicked, for sure. But the offense moved the ball. At least better than Notre Dame did. The passing and rushing yards are close for both Bama and Clemson. Getting in the red zone and not scoring killed us. But then, I was talking about Clemson defense (especially their D line) back in August or September.
Click to expand...

Inconsistent describes the Alabama offense on Monday. You gave a prime example of it describing the red zone.

It's irrelevant what Notre Dame did. Different game, different game plan.

Hate to break it to you but whether the total yards were similar or a night/day difference is also irrelevant. The score is the only thing that matters.

In case you didn't know, the key player on the D-line for Clemson didn't play. I could have read what you posted about the Clemson defense but you felt it was necessary to thread ban me because you can't handle anyone saying anything negative about Alabama.
 
CFM said:
Inconsistent describes the Alabama offense on Monday. You gave a prime example of it describing the red zone.

It's irrelevant what Notre Dame did. Different game, different game plan.

Hate to break it to you but whether the total yards were similar or a night/day difference is also irrelevant. The score is the only thing that matters.

In case you didn't know, the key player on the D-line for Clemson didn't play. I could have read what you posted about the Clemson defense but you felt it was necessary to thread ban me because you can't handle anyone saying anything negative about Alabama.
Click to expand...

First of all, I am not saying we didn't get our ass kicked. In fact, I believe I specifically said we did. But throwing in a detail or two doesn't change the topic.

And yes, I thread banned you. And it was not because I can't handle someone saying negative things about Alabama. I just got tire of the trolling.
 
WinterBorn said:
First of all, I am not saying we didn't get our ass kicked. In fact, I believe I specifically said we did. But throwing in a detail or two doesn't change the topic.

And yes, I thread banned you. And it was not because I can't handle someone saying negative things about Alabama. I just got tire of the trolling.
Click to expand...

You did say that. Throwing irrelevant details in after that must be our pain medication.

Then saying you made claims about Clemson's defense in September is meaningless. Why would I read a thread where I can't respond? That would have been like showing up at Levi's Stadium without my ticket.

I guess that's the difference between us. I don't care what you say or how you say it. You, nor anyone else, will be thread banned or put on ignore. I don't get offended or get my feelings hurt. You obviously do.
 
CFM said:
You did say that. Throwing irrelevant details in after that must be our pain medication.

Then saying you made claims about Clemson's defense in September is meaningless. Why would I read a thread where I can't respond? That would have been like showing up at Levi's Stadium without my ticket.

I guess that's the difference between us. I don't care what you say or how you say it. You, nor anyone else, will be thread banned or put on ignore. I don't get offended or get my feelings hurt. You obviously do.
Click to expand...

I did mention Clemson's defense in the other thread, which you were not banned from. On 8/7/18 I talked about them.

I scrolled back through the other thread. I was fine with your obsession with coming after me almost exclusively. It was when you stooped to making claims of having had sex with my late wife that I drew the line. That is simply disgusting.
 
In case you doubt it, the first post you made in the other college football thread was on 9/6. You spent most of the time trying to single me out and demean Alabama. I did not start the other thread for over 2 weeks. During which time I engaged your obsessing on one minor point or another, including insisting that Jalen Hurts is a loser. YOur first comment about sex with my wife was on 9/21. I started the new thread on 9/22. I am not quick thread ban or ignore people. Not at all. But there are lines that should not be crossed. It is a matter of simple decency. Something you obviously lack.
 
WinterBorn said:
I did mention Clemson's defense in the other thread, which you were not banned from. On 8/7/18 I talked about them.

I scrolled back through the other thread. I was fine with your obsession with coming after me almost exclusively. It was when you stooped to making claims of having had sex with my late wife that I drew the line. That is simply disgusting.
Click to expand...

"the other thread". Sure. It doesn't change that no matter what you or anyone else says, thread bans don't occur. Unlike you, I can take it because I know what you say isn't true. That you get offended enough to thread ban proves you aren't sure.

I didn't come after you. If that's what you think, you're too thin skinned.
 
WinterBorn said:
In case you doubt it, the first post you made in the other college football thread was on 9/6. You spent most of the time trying to single me out and demean Alabama. I did not start the other thread for over 2 weeks. During which time I engaged your obsessing on one minor point or another, including insisting that Jalen Hurts is a loser. YOur first comment about sex with my wife was on 9/21. I started the new thread on 9/22. I am not quick thread ban or ignore people. Not at all. But there are lines that should not be crossed. It is a matter of simple decency. Something you obviously lack.
Click to expand...

If you think a line was crossed, you prove you have doubt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top