Ancient ALIEN Creationism - science or new age RELIGION?
- Thread starter Bigdog
- Start date
AFAIK, vertical and horizontal are terms used only by creationists. You did not answer how one is vertical an one is horizontal. What do these orientations have to do with the process of evolution below or above the species level?
Again, do you think the limit of evolution is at the level of species or at the made up level of "kind?"
I can easily point you to many of the observed speciation events but you will likely reject them for being below the level of "kind."
LOL. It does not suggest that.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Yes it does.
I am going to waste a little energy on this thread. 1. the "aliens" are the fallen angels... they were indeed in the earth before the overthrow/ katabole. this is pre genesis...http://www.bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Lexicon.show/ID/G2602/katabole.htm... http://biblehub.com/kjv/revelation/12.htm since it is pre genesis, it is not the purpose of the book of the new beginning/ s. the book/ bible is about redemption of mankind/ the revelation of Jesus Christ. it is only a miniscule account of God's interaction with man, creation, etc. http://biblehub.com/kjv/john/21.htm. v.25 part. 2. it is apparent that these fallen angels/ giants/ men of renown did indeed infect the seed of the planting of The Lord, Eve[ mother of living/ Ibriy/ Hebrew] with the seed of the damned fallen angels...http://biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/6.htm. they are referred to as the sons of God because they are his created beloved which were indeed sons to Him until they rebelled and were necessarily determined for destruction. these evil offspring of the fallen angels/ giants had to be destroyed, they caused violence/ rebellion against the peaceful order of The Lord to cover the entire earth [ bad seed], hence the flood. I am only touching on a fraction of the recorded evidence. I am not a scholar/ teacher. I only want you people to get a clue how ridiculous these dna engineering theory upside down and inside out evolutionary theory type baloney is. all evidence is in that book of preserved truth some of you fools think it is cute to call the buy bull. that is all you will get. I will throw you one more pearl of truth you will probably trample under your feet; The Lord, my Father does own a space vehicle... http://biblehub.com/kjv/ezekiel/1.htm . he owns an entire city called new Jerusalem which, by my poor mathematics is 1500 miles by 1500 miles square .. http://biblehub.com/kjv/revelation/21.htm. when I die, I will be part of that city. I believe what it says.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Let's say he meant Genus. You can work with that, right?
Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
K gomie...
In fact since the mechanism of transfer is not known, anything is possible. More than likely though, when the way that memories are transferred is understood, we will be seen as the machines that we are. Machines in the manner as God built us just as someone designed and built your computer.
Wrong son, I never used the word reincarnation; nor did I even imply such a thing. All I want you to do is explain how a bad memory of a smell, can be transferred from an adult to a child? The term epigenics has been applied to this, but nothing in the term describes the method of transfer from an adult brain, to that adults sex cells that form the offspring.
LOL, you have no clue so you start resorting to belief in reincarnation.
It's ok, we accept your defeat, in fact once you admit that you do not know, you will become more intelligent as only those who do not know can learn, though you clearly might be an exception.
Next babble
Do you have any more of those purple pills for sale?
That's not what he said.
That at least makes sense. But I am pretty sure if I give him the ample evidence he will do what a billion of you morons have done before and move the goalposts.
Your question is completely idiotic. Apparently, you are asking that we demonstrate an animal changing so drastically that it cannot be closely related to its parent species. Evolution does not make such a prediction but rather would suggest it is not likely or even possible. It also does not predict the sort of changes that usually (see next paragraph) exist between differing specimens of a genus in the short time that we have had the wherewithal to observe such an event. So just keep kicking your God to the next gap but you will still need to provide some reason to believe speciation is possible but evolution hits its limit at the taxonomic level of genus or the creationist invention of"kind."
Another reason your question is so stupid is that taxonomic ranks like genus are not a measure of variation. That is, the variation in one genus is not the same as it is in another genus. There is no way to test that an animal has crossed the non existing genus threshold of variation. We can test speciation through attempts at forced breeding. As usual, you creationists are misusing the language, terms and science.
Dick you have no idea what current evolutionary theory consist of, which is that all life has a common ancestor which means that one species most certainly did become another over time. Until you at least accept the theory you can neither defend nor deny it.
Now take your medication and go back to sleep
My bad, you said it somehow supports an afterlife but you have failed to make the case.
There is no transfer of a memory, dumbfuck. AFAIK, the author's never suggested such a thing. You apparently picked up that description from some science journalist and have decided that is more important than anything the scientists have said. You reject their words describing this as a mechanism for turning on and off genes for your bullshit about memories because it supports the fairytales of reincarnation and the afterlife that you want to believe.
They definitely showed support for the notion that epigenetics (not epigenics dumbass) was involved. The marker was present on the sperm and rather predictable effects were demonstrated in the offspring. They don't know everything about how the information reaches the sperm but they have clearly supported an epigenetic cause. The explanations about methylation and how that effects gene expression goes over your head. But that's your problem. It's not an argument.
Where have I rejected speciation or common ancestry?
This is just more proof of your comprehension problems and explains how it is you mistook an epigenetic study as proof of an afterlife.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Lol......I can think of one......that there is no reason to say she WOULDN'T be different....
Idiots like PiMPle, runt and maybe Ralph argue that proof of "macroevolution" (see creationist dictionary) requires the observation of an event that is not testable even in a trillion year study. If you are asking for speciation, we have observed that and can test for the event. But neither "kind" nor genus describe a testable level of variation. The argument is based on ignorance of what taxonomic ranks represent or faith in the useless "kind," not science.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
an argument that is shared by everyone who understands the definition of the scientific method.......present company excluded, of course......
Describe the test that will disprove your claim? Speciation events we can test and have observed. Kind and genus do not present us with a testable level of variation.
I haven't heard of the creationist alien theories, but the fact that ancients in south america didn't have the laser or weight lifting technology to create some of their fine cut stones, could lead one to believe they had extra terrestrial help.
Or perhaps they had ancient tech we aren't yet aware of.
Or perhaps they had ancient tech we aren't yet aware of.