Atheist conclusions about the historicity of the resurrection

Cypress said:
Jesus was a Jew, but more importantly your claim is that the New Testament is a pack of lies written by men who intended to deceive. So what's your proof that Jesus actually said this?
Click to expand...
actually he was the first christian if you go by what he said about himself.

these word games don't interest me too much tho.

though I can easily destroy your shit.
 
Cypress said:
You can't say the NT was written by liars, and then cherry pick and misrepresent a NT story as historical fact for the purpose of justifying your antisemitism.
Click to expand...
oh Lord.

what's antisemitic.

the alleged facts of the new testament narrative?

the Jews killed Jesus in that narrative.

it's not anti-semitic you douche nozzle.

here you are being a Zionist asshat, just as predicted.

you're so easy to fuck in the ass.
 

  1. Zionists Behind The Scofield 'Bible' - It's Powerful Effect On Modern ...​


    https://christianobserver.net › the-scofield-bible-its-powerful-effect-on-modern-christianity
    Massive pro-Zionist notes were added to the 1967 edition, and some of Scofield's most significant notes from the original editions were removed where they apparently failed to further Zionist aims fast enough. Yet this edition retains the title, "The New Scofield Reference Bible, Holy Bible, Editor C.I. Scofield."
  2. wrmea.org

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    The Scofield Bible—The Book That Made Zionists of America's ... - WRMEA​


    https://www.wrmea.org › 2015-october › the-scofield-bible-the-book-that-made-zionists-of-americas-evangelical-christians.html
    Although the Scofield Reference Bible contains the text of the King James Authorized Version, it is not the traditional Protestant bible but Cyrus I. Scofield's annotated commentary that is problematic. ... Central to Christian Zionist belief is Scofield's commentary (italicized below) on Genesis 12:3: "'I will bless them that bless ...
  3. en.wikipedia.org

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    Scofield Reference Bible - Wikipedia​

 
Neoclitorus said:
confucianism is a state religion based on a hierarchy, so of course your dumbass thinks it's' the bees knees.
Click to expand...
The authors of the New Testament preach total submission and obedience to the God of Abraham.

Confucius taught the virtue of remonstrance, which is the duty to speak truth to power, and reproach authorities who are corrupt or unjust.

Which is really more authoritarian?
 
Cypress said:
The authors of the New Testament preach total submission and obedience to the God of Abraham.

Confucius taught the virtue of remonstrance, which is the duty to speak truth to power, and reproach authorities who are corrupt or unjust.

Which is really more authoritarian?
Click to expand...
I think the message was that Jesus said the Jews were full of shit, and they only needed one law, and they were haughty assholes.

Jesus spoke truth to power.

you can't fucking read.
 
Neoclitorus said:
do you deny he said it somewhere?

its a major teaching of the faith.
Click to expand...
The only place I recall seeing that claim, that he's the literal son of God, is in the book of John which was written long after Jesus' death. Don't you think it's odd that none of the gospels made that claim?

A major teaching of the faith is that hell is a place of eternal torture. That's not what the Bible says.
 
EdwinA said:
Being knowledgeable about how the Jewish authors used certain words and what they meant isn't rocket science,
Click to expand...

And you have such knowledge? I didn't realize there was an ancient hebrew section of the GED.


EdwinA said:
but certainly over your head; I mean we both know you've never actually read the books or anything else in orthodox Jewish history
Click to expand...

And you have? Do tell!

EdwinA said:
, so lol away, dumbass. For instance, when using the term 'neighbor' in Jewish writings in that era, you probably think it has the same meaning it does in modern America. It doesn't, and you don't have the first clue why, do you, moron. lol.
Click to expand...

Wow. You're like super duper smart. So the words dont' mean what they say if they disagree with what YOU want them to say. That's par for the course for people like you.

:)
 
ZenMode said:
The only place I recall seeing that claim, that he's the literal son of God, is in the book of John which was written long after Jesus' death. Don't you think it's odd that none of the gospels made that claim?

A major teaching of the faith is that hell is a place of eternal torture. That's not what the Bible says.
Click to expand...
we all know the church made that up about hell in the mid ages.



but you found the reference. good for you.

don't blame me that you found it.
 
Daylight63 said:
And you have such knowledge? I didn't realize there was an ancient hebrew section of the GED.




And you have? Do tell!



Wow. You're like super duper smart. So the words dont' mean what they say if they disagree with what YOU want them to say. That's par for the course for people like you.

:)
Click to expand...
you're still a poopy crusted taint-wrinkle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top