Atheist conclusions about the historicity of the resurrection

was it after the 47 invasion?

So you're fine with Arab savages doing whatever they want, it's just Jews that are bad, eh?
Nope.

1. How they self-identify is irrelevant. If tomorrow they were to self-identify as unicornians, your lust to eradicate them would remain equally abhorrent.

2. You are demonizing them and condemning them on the sole basis of being Arab. Iran has been the only attacker of Israel since before 1979. You aren't judging the Arabs on any basis for having attacked Israel because they haven't. You are simply condemning the Arabs for being Arabs.

All of your condemnation should be directed at Iran and Iran's proxies, but it isn't. You are giving Iran, the only attacker of Israel, a pass for their transgressions, and instead attempting to transfer Iran's transgressions onto Arabs so you can justifify your support for a horrible genocide.


... and in reconition for having no defense for your indefensible position, you misrepresent my position and pretend to attack me for the bogus position you have assigned to me. Good luck with that.

More retarded apologia and fake news from an antisemitic loon.
 
Nope.

1. How they self-identify is irrelevant. If tomorrow they were to self-identify as unicornians, your lust to eradicate them would remain equally abhorrent.

2. You are demonizing them and condemning them on the sole basis of being Arab. Iran has been the only attacker of Israel since before 1979. You aren't judging the Arabs on any basis for having attacked Israel because they haven't. You are simply condemning the Arabs for being Arabs.

All of your condemnation should be directed at Iran and Iran's proxies, but it isn't. You are giving Iran, the only attacker of Israel, a pass for their transgressions, and instead attempting to transfer Iran's transgressions onto Arabs so you can justifify your support for a horrible genocide.


... and in reconition for having no defense for your indefensible position, you misrepresent my position and pretend to attack me for the bogus position you have assigned to me. Good luck with that.
You are still locked in these paradoxes, IBD.
You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.
 
I realize that I am free to believe that, but that is not what I believe. You, on the other hand, are free to believe that Jesus was an historical figure, and none of your rationale is either valid or even necessary. Apparently your faith is weak and you need more if you are going to cling to your beliefs.

Be careful. @Cypress gets really upset when someone questions his faith.
 
Yes, it is bogus.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Remember, I determine my position, not you or anyone else.
You can't deny your own posts, IBD. It never works. You have stated your position.
I don't know why you suddenly feel empowered to speak for me.
I'm not. YOU spoke for yourself already! Denying your own posts never works, IBD.
One more time, I distance myself from your eager support for genocide and your special pleading fallacies.
Fallacy fallacy. You are still locked in this paradox. There is no genocide.
 
Back
Top