Banned From Youtube Tucker Carlson Questions Vaccine Safety

[Joh17]

I can't yet determine if you are a Trumptard or if you are mocking.

Neither one honestly.

 

[Trumpet]

I can't yet determine if you are a Trumptard or if you are mocking.

I was wondering the same thing.

 

[Into the Night]

You are mistaken - the Supreme Court is fully empowered when it comes to interpreting the Constitution.

"As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution."

Source - The Supreme Court

Not according to the Constitution of the United States. See Article III. False authority fallacy. The Constitution of the United States is the ONLY authoritative reference of the Constitution of the United States.

 

[Into the Night]

WOW, you need to go back and take a civics class

False authority fallacy. The Constitution of the United States is the ONLY authoritative reference of the Constitution of the United States.

 

[AProudLefty]

??? I never made any type of reasoning like that! You are hallucinating.

Okay then explain what you meant by your statement: "Such 'laws' are unconstitutional."

 

[Djinn]

Not according to the Constitution of the United States. See Article III. False authority fallacy. The Constitution of the United States is the ONLY authoritative reference of the Constitution of the United States.

The purpose of judges (in general) is to serve as arbiters of the law. That means they are responsible for interpreting the law. If there was no need for legal interpretation, there would be no need for judges. The Supreme Court is no different.

 

[Nordberg]

False authority fallacy. The Constitution of the United States is the ONLY authoritative reference of the Constitution of the United States.

The constitution is a document. It is an authority on nothing. The Supremes decide what the document means.

 

[Into the Night]

Okay then explain what you meant by your statement: "Such 'laws' are unconstitutional."

Already did. RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

The purpose of judges (in general) is to serve as arbiters of the law. That means they are responsible for interpreting the law. If there was no need for legal interpretation, there would be no need for judges. The Supreme Court is no different.

No judge has authority to interpret the Constitution of the United States.
No State judge has authority to interpret the constitution of their State nor the Constitution of the United States.

You really should read those documents for once.

 

[AProudLefty]

Already did. RQAA.

As expected.

 

[Into the Night]

The constitution is a document. It is an authority on nothing. The Supremes decide what the document means.

Wrong. You are arguing for an oligarchy. I already know you don't recognize the Constitution of the United States nor any State constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

As expected.

Then why do you keep asking the same question over and over? It's already been answered.

 

[AProudLefty]

Then why do you keep asking the same question over and over? It's already been answered.

I didn't ask a question.

BTW, you asked me a question.

 

[reagansghost]

I hope Cucker never gets vaxxed and attends every upcoming GOP super-spreader event

 

[Hawkeye10]

Tucker just hammered His Eminence Fauci, called for looking into criminally charging him.

I need to see a lot more of this.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Mind Molders Mind Mold:

 

[Darth Omar]

Maybe if youtube banned Tucker Carlson, it was because Carson was spreading disinformation.

Who decides what is disinformation? That calls for a literal Ministry of Truth.

The left has us going down a dark road with this stuff.

 

[Darth Omar]

Tucker just hammered His Eminence Fauci, called for looking into criminally charging him.

I need to see a lot more of this.

I’m not sure about a criminal charge but I’m also not sure how much longer ‘the approved sources’ can ignore this story.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Who decides what is disinformation? That calls for a literal Ministry of Truth.

The left has us going down a dark road with this stuff.

The Regressive Left....the stewards of this Next Dark Age.

Buckle Up.....this is so going to suck.

I warned you.

 

[Hawkeye10]

I’m not sure about a criminal charge but I’m also not sure how much longer ‘the approved sources’ can ignore this story.

He had so much to do with gain of function work being done by humans, he was compromised from the jump, everything that he got wrong after that might have been him protecting himself at the cost of the nation.

I demand a full investigation, by someone(s) who will tell the truth.