This is disturbing even out of a third world Banana Republic like Xi's Biden Regime.
Biden Sent FBI to Kill Trump?
- Thread starter Uncensored2008
- Start date
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Your title is false and gay.
Why would the FBI explicitly authorize deadly force when retrieving presidential documents? Was Biden literally sending government agents to assassinate his political opponent?
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Why did the Biden rules of engagement include deadly force? Did Biden expect his STASI to kill his political rival?
Even for Joe Biden this is shocking.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Ìt's standard procedure for uncooperative people. What, you honestly think every warrant was meant to assassinate people.
THINK.
So, you can't offer any rational reason for Biden to send agents with orders to use deadly force?
I don't think there is a rational explanation. This is more third world dictator SHIT from Xi's Biden Regime.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Already explained above. It's SOP.
For former presidents of the United States?
Uh, no. This is the kind of shit the Khmer Rouge did.
Very few warrants stipulate the use of deadly force. Was Wray planning to gun down Trump's Secret Service detail, and then knock of the last legitimate POTUS?
ZenMode
Well-known member
Am I the only one who already knew law enforcement, like any civilian, can use lethal force when it's justified?
In related news, firemen can use hoses when there's a fire to put out.
In Uganda under Idi Amin it was SOP, not in the USA prior to the third world Biden Junta.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Did they use deadly force?
His brain does not work well enough to run a Junta....Dont B Dumb....that hurts in this particular universe.
Of course they can.
It is not written into the rules of engagement on warrants generally - particularly not for a contested process "crime."
Think Biden had one of his famous tantrums because they didn't kill Trump?
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
ZenMode
Well-known member
We have no idea whether or not the wording is accurate. The Tweet is of a document that is not the warrant, it's a pic of a (bias) document that claims to quote wording from the warrant of the raid on Mar-a-Lago, yet there's no reference to Mar-a-Lago, Trump or literally anything that gives context for what is being shown.
It's as useless a Tweet, yet claiming to be important, as you will see.
You grasp that the white portions are the redacted FBI orders, obtained through FOA lawsuits, right?
There is no defending this;